<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Europace - current issue</title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Europace - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1532-2092</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>May 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Europace</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1099-5129</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/513?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/528?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/536?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/545?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/552?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/556?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/558?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/566?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/572?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/574?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/588?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/591?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/600?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/606?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/609?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/610?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/618?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/624?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/629?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/636?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/638?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/641?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/643?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/513?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Consensus document on antithrombotic therapy in the setting of electrophysiological procedures]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/513?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blanc, J. J., Almendral, J., Brignole, M., Fatemi, M., Gjesdal, K., Gonzalez-Torrecilla, E., Kulakowski, P., Lip, G. Y.H., Shah, D., Wolpert, C., on behalf of the Scientific Initiatives Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun104</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Consensus document on antithrombotic therapy in the setting of electrophysiological procedures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>527</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>513</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EHRA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/528?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dual-chamber defibrillators reduce clinically significant adverse events compared with single-chamber devices: results from the DATAS (Dual chamber and Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Adverse events Study) trial]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/528?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>This randomized trial evaluated clinically significant adverse events (CSAEs), in patients implanted with dual-chamber (DC) vs. single-chamber (SC) implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). DC-ICD had atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) therapy capabilities. Strict programming recommendations were reinforced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>Patients with conventional SC-ICD indication were randomized to DC-ICD, SC-ICD, or a DC-ICD programmed as an SC-ICD (SC-simulated) and followed for 16 months. Patients in the DC and SC-simulated groups crossed over after 8 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of CSAE: all-cause mortality; invasive intervention; hospitalization (&gt;24 h) for cardiovascular causes; inappropriate shocks (two or more episodes); and sustained symptomatic AT lasting &gt;48 h. The outcome variable was a pre-specified score that corrected for clinical severity and follow-up duration. Three hundred and thirty-four patients were analysed (DC-ICD, <I>n</I> = 112; SC-ICD, <I>n</I> = 111; SC-simulated, <I>n</I> = 111). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.36 &plusmn; 0.13, 69% were in functional class &ge;II. CSAE occurred in 65 DC-ICD, 82 SC-ICD, and 84 SC-simulated patients. The outcome variable was 33% lower in the DC-ICD group (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.14&ndash;0.67; <I>P</I> = 0.0028). Mortality was 4% in DC, 9% in SC, and 10% in SC-simulated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In patients with a standard SC-ICD indication, DC-ICD was associated with less CSAE when compared with SC-ICD.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Almendral, J., Arribas, F., Wolpert, C., Ricci, R., Adragao, P., Cobo, E., Navarro, X., Quesada, A., the DATAS Steering Committee and Writing Committee on behalf of the DATAS Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dual-chamber defibrillators reduce clinically significant adverse events compared with single-chamber devices: results from the DATAS (Dual chamber and Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Adverse events Study) trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>535</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>528</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ICDs</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/536?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implantable cardioverter defibrillator following acute myocardial infarction: the '48-hour' and '40-day' rule]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/536?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Until recently, randomized studies of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have only included patients with a remote history of myocardial infarction (MI). Two studies evaluated the use of ICDs early following MI, the DINAMIT and BEST+ICD studies, but failed to demonstrate significant reduction in mortality. Current guidelines therefore recommend deferring ICD implantation for at least 40 days following MI. This article highlights the limitations of these two studies and reviews the application of the &lsquo;40-day&rsquo; rule to patients with acute MI.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, H. S., Lip, G. Y.H., Tse, H.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implantable cardioverter defibrillator following acute myocardial infarction: the '48-hour' and '40-day' rule]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>539</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>536</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ICDs</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Decision-making, emotional distress, and quality of life in patients affected by the recall of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>We sought to investigate whether patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) were suffering from emotional distress related to the recent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalls, to better understand their decision process related to device replacement, and to assess any impact of recall on quality of life (QOL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>Thirty-one patients experiencing device recalls answered questions regarding their knowledge about the recall and their decision whether to replace the device. Fifty patients whose devices were not recalled reported demographic data. In both groups, psychological factors were assessed. No significant differences were found for psychological factors. Most patients reported being informed of their recall by their physician. Most estimated the risk of device failure to be low or very low, but they overestimated the fail rate. Thirty-six per cent of patients reported feeling anxious about the recall.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>No significant differences existed in psychological factors and QOL between patients whose ICDs were recalled compared with those whose devices were not. The majority of patients whose ICDs are the subject of an FDA advisory/recall have a realistic understanding of the risks of device failure. Prompt information, support, and reassurance provided by healthcare professionals may allay patient distress.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gibson, D. P., Kuntz, K. K., Levenson, J. L., Ellenbogen, K. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun082</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Decision-making, emotional distress, and quality of life in patients affected by the recall of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>544</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ICDs</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/545?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Symptomatic heart failure is the most important clinical correlate of impaired quality of life, anxiety, and depression in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients: a single-centre, cross-sectional study in 610 patients]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/545?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To identify correlates of impaired quality of life (QOL), anxiety, and depression in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>Surviving patients (<I>n</I> = 610) who received an ICD in our institution since 1989 completed the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Mean age was 62.4 years with 18% females. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, symptomatic heart failure was the most important correlate of impaired QOL (SF-36) across all eight subscales [odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 5.21 to 22.53)], whereas psychotropic medication, age, comorbidity, amiodarone, and ICD shocks all correlated to a lesser extent. Symptomatic heart failure was also the most dominant correlate of anxiety [OR 5.15 (3.08&ndash;8.63), <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001] and depression [OR 6.82 (3.77&ndash;12.39), <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001]. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks correlated less yet significantly with anxiety [OR 2.21 (1.32&ndash;3.72) <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01] and depression [OR 2.00 (1.06&ndash;3.80), <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05].</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Symptomatic heart failure was the single most important clinical correlate of impaired QOL, anxiety, and depression, with ICD shocks playing only a secondary role. This suggests that comorbidity rather than ICD therapy <I>per se</I> influences patients' device acceptance, supporting the increasing use of prophylactic ICD implantation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johansen, J. B., Pedersen, S. S., Spindler, H., Andersen, K., Nielsen, J. C., Mortensen, P. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Symptomatic heart failure is the most important clinical correlate of impaired quality of life, anxiety, and depression in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients: a single-centre, cross-sectional study in 610 patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>551</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>545</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ICDs</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/552?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[T-wave oversensing and inappropriate shocks: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/552?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A 27-year-old male with congenital long QT syndrome, SCN5A mutation experienced recurrent inappropriate exercise-related implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. This device showed T-wave oversensing with double, which lead to these device discharges. Dynamic T-wave oversensing was reproducibly provoked at exercise treadmill testing and was confirmed as the mechanism leading to double counting. The insertion of a new pacing and sensing lead with increased R-wave amplitude did not solve the problem. Exchanging the existing ICD generator with one capable of automatic sensitivity control (Biotronik, Lexos DR, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) completely eliminated T-wave oversensing and inappropriate shocks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srivathsan, K., Scott, L. R., Altemose, G. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[T-wave oversensing and inappropriate shocks: a case report]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>555</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>552</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ICDs</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/556?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early automatic remote detection of combined lead insulation defect and ICD damage]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/556?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Lead and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) device failure is a severe problem in ICD therapy and may occur without preceding signs of deterioration. Insulation lead failure and subsequent ICD defect 7 months after ICD implantation for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a 70-year-old male was automatically detected with the Home Monitoring system. Immediate lead and device replacement was performed. This case illustrates the benefit of permanent automatic remote monitoring of implanted active devices.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neuzil, P., Taborsky, M., Holy, F., Wallbrueck, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early automatic remote detection of combined lead insulation defect and ICD damage]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>557</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>556</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ICDs</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/558?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: importance of new-onset atrial fibrillation and total atrial conduction time]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/558?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm (SR), but its value in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. Furthermore, response to CRT may be difficult to predict in these patients. The aim of our study was to investigate whether predictors for CRT success differ between patients with AF and SR and to study the influence of present or developing AF on response to CRT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>We examined consecutive patients in whom CRT was implanted disregarding the atrial rhythm. Atrial fibrillation was defined as either current or earlier AF, response to CRT was defined as a decrease in the left ventricular end-systolic volume of &ge;10% after 6 months. Total atrial conduction time (TACT), a measure to predict the risk of developing AF, was determined by echocardiography. We included 114 patients, of whom 56 (49%) were known with AF (23 current AF and 33 earlier AF). The other 58 patients had no history of AF. After 6 months, response in current and earlier AF and that in SR patients was comparable (56, 58 and 55%, respectively). In AF patients, multivariate analysis revealed a shorter TACT at baseline [odds ratio (OR) 16.7 (1.5&ndash;185.3), <I>P</I> = 0.02] and an interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) &gt;40 ms [OR 10.4 (1.0&ndash;110.9), <I>P</I> = 0.05] as predictors for response. Non-responders more frequently suffered from new-onset AF (<I>P</I> = 0.02).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Failure to CRT is associated with new-onset AF. Total atrial activation time may be a parameter to predict response in AF patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buck, S., Rienstra, M., Maass, A. H., Nieuwland, W., Van Veldhuisen, D. J., Van Gelder, I. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: importance of new-onset atrial fibrillation and total atrial conduction time]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>565</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>558</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIAC RESYNCHRONISATION THERAPY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/566?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization: particular focus on patients with right bundle branch block with and without coexistent left-sided conduction defects]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/566?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to assess the significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure (HF) patients considered eligible for cardiac resynchronization.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>A total of 200 consecutive HF patients (158 males, mean age 56 &plusmn; 13.5 years) with standard indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were evaluated prospectively. The prevalence of an interventricular mechanical delay &ge;40 ms was lower in patients with pure right bundle branch block (RBBB) than that in those with RBBB plus left fascicular hemiblock (RBBB-LFH) and those with left bundle branch block (LBBB) (33 vs. 50 vs. 54%, <I>P</I> = 0.05). A maximal difference in peak myocardial systolic velocity among all 12 segments (Ts)&gt;100 ms was found in 63% of the patients with LBBB, whereas it was present in 31% of the patients with pure RBBB and in 42% of those with RBBB-LFH (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). A standard deviation of Ts (Ts-SD)&gt;34 ms was present in 58% of the LBBB subjects, but in only 29% and 42% of the patients with pure RBBB and RBBB-LFH, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Intraventricular dyssynchrony, however, was not different in patients with pure RBBB and in those with RBBB-LFH in terms of maximal difference in Ts (<I>P</I> = 0.25) and Ts-SD (<I>P</I> = 0.17).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although LBBB was more often associated with intraventricular dyssynchrony, ECG sign of additional left ventricular (LV) conduction delay is not a helpful tool for the identification of intra-LV mechanical dyssynchrony in HF patients with RBBB who would benefit from CRT.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haghjoo, M., Bagherzadeh, A., Farahani, M. M., Haghighi, Z. O., Sadr-Ameli, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization: particular focus on patients with right bundle branch block with and without coexistent left-sided conduction defects]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>571</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>566</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIAC RESYNCHRONISATION THERAPY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/572?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Base over apex: does site matter for pacing the right ventricle?]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/572?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gammage, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Base over apex: does site matter for pacing the right ventricle?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>573</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>572</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ALTERNATIVE VENTRICULAR PACING SITES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/574?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term outcomes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoing septal ventricular lead implantation compared with standard apical pacing]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/574?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Left ventricular function may be altered by right ventricular apical pacing. The aims of the study were to compare the long-term course of different parameters of left ventricular dysfunction in patients undergoing implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with the ventricular lead in a septal position vs. in a standard apical position.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We randomized 98 patients with atrioventricular block (AV-block) undergoing pacemaker implantation to positioning the ventricular lead in the high or mid septum (<I>n</I> = 53) or in the apex (<I>n</I> = 45) of the right ventricle. N-terminal pro-brain natriuetic peptide (BNP) levels, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and exercise capacity were analysed 3 days, 3 months, and 18 months after the implantation. The primary endpoints were the changes of these parameters from baseline to 18 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Changes of BNP levels, LVEF, and exercise capacity from baseline to 18 months were statistically not different between septal and apical stimulation. The clinical occurrence or deterioration of overt heart failure was similar in both treatment arms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>With regard to different parameters of congestive heart failure, a septal stimulation site is not superior to conventional apical pacing in unselected patients undergoing pacemaker implantation for AV-block.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kypta, A., Steinwender, C., Kammler, J., Leisch, F., Hofmann, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term outcomes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoing septal ventricular lead implantation compared with standard apical pacing]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>579</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>574</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ALTERNATIVE VENTRICULAR PACING SITES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Direct His bundle pacing preserves coronary perfusion compared with right ventricular apical pacing: a prospective, cross-over mid-term study]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The His bundle is regarded as the most physiological site for ventricular pacing, in that it avoids the adverse effects of right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP). However, very few studies have compared the effects of direct His bundle pacing (DHBP) and RVAP. The aim of our study was the intra-patient comparison of myocardial perfusion corresponding to these two different pacing techniques, as perfusion expresses local workload and is related to long-term outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>Twelve consecutive patients with standard pacemaker indication (9 male, 74 &plusmn; 9 years) entered the study. Pacing leads were implanted in the right ventricular apex and directly in the His bundle, and were connected to different ports of the pacemaker. All patients first underwent 3 months of DHBP, followed by 3 months of RVAP. At the end of each 3-month period, myocardial perfusion was measured at rest using scintigraphy with Tc99m-SestaMIBI. The average values of perfusion were evaluated on a 20-segment basis. All patients also underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), to measure dyssynchrony, and a blood sample was taken for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) assay. The perfusion score during DHBP pacing was significantly better than during RVAP (0.44 &plusmn; 0.5 vs. 0.71 &plusmn; 0.53, respectively; <I>P</I> = 0.011). None of the patients showed lower perfusion during DHBP than during RVAP. We found no significant difference in NYHA class, ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, or plasmatic BNP between DHBP and RVAP. However, mitral regurgitation (0.26 &plusmn; 0.21 vs. 0.37 &plusmn; 0.25; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) and dyssynchrony (13.75 &plusmn; 4.28 vs. 22.02 &plusmn; 8.44; <I>P</I> = 0.008) were significantly less during DHBP than during RVAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Direct His bundle pacing is superior to RVAP in preserving the physiologic distribution of myocardial blood flow and reducing mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dyssynchrony.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zanon, F., Bacchiega, E., Rampin, L., Aggio, S., Baracca, E., Pastore, G., Marotta, T., Corbucci, G., Roncon, L., Rubello, D., Prinzen, F. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Direct His bundle pacing preserves coronary perfusion compared with right ventricular apical pacing: a prospective, cross-over mid-term study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>587</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ALTERNATIVE VENTRICULAR PACING SITES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/588?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Persistent left superior vena cava: a blessing in disguise]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/588?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Persistent left superior vena cava (SVC) is an uncommon condition, usually encountered during cannulation of the left subclavian vein. We describe a patient who required a cardiac device upgrade to cardiac resynchronization implantable cardioverter defibrillator for biventricular failure. The presence of a persistent left SVC proved to be a blessing in disguise in this patient as he had since developed total occlusion of the left subclavian-innominate system.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imran, N., Grubb, B., Kanjwal, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Persistent left superior vena cava: a blessing in disguise]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>590</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>588</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ALTERNATIVE VENTRICULAR PACING SITES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/591?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pseudomalfunction of a dual chamber pacemaker caused by accelerated junctional rhythm and alternating ventricular safety pacing]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/591?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng, S.-T., Yeh, K.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pseudomalfunction of a dual chamber pacemaker caused by accelerated junctional rhythm and alternating ventricular safety pacing]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>592</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>591</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ALTERNATIVE VENTRICULAR PACING SITES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves cardiac function: a prospective study on the impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on left ventricular function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Beneficial effects of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been demonstrated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and significantly impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, the impact of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on cardiac function in patients with paroxysmal AF and impaired LVEF remains under discussion. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PVI for paroxysmal AF on cardiac function in patients with impaired LVEF using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>A total number of 70 patients with paroxysmal AF and episodes &le;24 h were scanned on a 1.5-T-CMRI before and 6 months after PVI during sinus rhythm. End-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and LVEF were determined by epicardial and endocardial measurements. Patients were categorized into two groups regarding cardiac function as assessed by CMRI: group 1 patients (<I>n</I> = 18) with an LVEF &lt; 50% and patients with an LVEF &gt; 50% (group 2, <I>n</I> = 52). Group 1 patients demonstrated a significant lower success rate than patients of group 2 after a follow-up of 152 &plusmn; 40 days (50 vs. 73%, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in group 1 patients demonstrated a significant improvement in cardiac function after AF ablation (41 &plusmn; 6 vs. 51 &plusmn; 12%, <I>P</I> = 0.004), whereas group 2 patients did not show significant differences (60 &plusmn; 6 vs. 59 &plusmn; 9%, <I>P</I> = 0.22) after a 6 months follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Pulmonary vein isolation improves cardiac function in patients with paroxysmal AF and impaired LVEF. These data suggest that an impaired LV function can be partially attributed to AF with short-lasting paroxysms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lutomsky, B. A., Rostock, T., Koops, A., Steven, D., Mullerleile, K., Servatius, H., Drewitz, I., Ueberschar, D., Plagemann, T., Ventura, R., Meinertz, T., Willems, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves cardiac function: a prospective study on the impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on left ventricular function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>599</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/600?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pulmonary vein isolation combined with superior vena cava isolation for atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective randomized study]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/600?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is an established strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Superior vena cava (SVC), by harbouring the majority of non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci, is the most common non-PV origin for AF. However, it is unknown whether CPVI combined with SVC isolation (SVCI) could improve clinical results and whether SVCI is technically safe and feasible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>A total of 106 cases (58 males, average age 66.0 &plusmn; 8.8 years) with paroxysmal AF were included for ablation. They were allocated randomly to two groups: CPVI group (<I>n</I> = 54) and CPVI + SVCI group (<I>n</I> = 52). All cases underwent the procedure successfully. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all cases. The procedural time and fluoroscopic time were comparable between the two groups. The mean ablation time for SVC was 7.8 &plusmn; 2.7 min. Superior vena cava isolation was obtained in 50/52 cases. In the remaining two cases, SVCI was not achieved because of obviating diaphragmatic nerve injury. During a mean follow-up of 4 &plusmn; 2 months, 12 (22.2%) cases in the CPVI group and 10 (19.2%) cases in the CPVI + SVCI group had atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATa) recurrence (<I>P</I> = 0.70). Nine of 12 cases in the CPVI group and 8/10 cases in the CPVI + SVCI group underwent reablation (<I>P</I> = 0.86), and PV reconnection occurred in 7/9 cases in the CPVI group and in 8/8 cases in the CPVI + SVCI group. All PV reconnection was reisolated by gaps ablation. There was no SVC reconnection in the CPVI + SVCI group. In two cases without PV reconnection from the CPVI group, SVC-originated short run of atrial tachycardia was identified and eliminated by the SVCI. At the end of 12 months of follow-up, 50 cases (92.6%) in the CPVI group and 49 (94.2%) in the CPVI + SVC group were free of ATa recurrence (<I>P</I> = 0.73).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In our series of paroxysmal AF patients, empirically adding SVCI to CPVI did not significantly reduce the AF recurrence after ablation. Superior vena cava isolation may be useful, however, in selected patients in whom the SVC is identified as a trigger for AF. However, because of the preliminary property of the study and its relatively small sample size, the impact of SVCI on clinical results should be evaluated in a large series of patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, X.-H., Liu, X., Sun, Y.-M., Shi, H.-F., Zhou, L., Gu, J.-N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pulmonary vein isolation combined with superior vena cava isolation for atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective randomized study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>605</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>600</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/606?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Verification of electrical isolation of pulmonary veins following left atrial circumferential ablation may require sinus rhythm]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/606?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A 67-year-old female with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent left atrial circumferential ablation, and during the procedure, she developed AF. Once the ablation was complete, the left upper pulmonary vein (LUPV) appeared to continue in a rapid disorganized rhythm, despite further attempts at isolating this vein. When the patient was electrically cardioverted to sinus rhythm to assist mapping, the LUPV remained in a disorganized rhythm, pulmonary vein (PV) fibrillation. This case illustrates a possible pitfall in confirming complete isolation of the PVs during AF.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lencioni, M., Muhyaldeen, S., Marshall, H., Griffith, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun074</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Verification of electrical isolation of pulmonary veins following left atrial circumferential ablation may require sinus rhythm]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>608</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>606</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/609?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unusual thrombo-embolic event after radiofrequency ablation]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/609?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiliszek, M., Kozluk, E., Scislo, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unusual thrombo-embolic event after radiofrequency ablation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>609</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>609</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/610?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Short-term sinus rhythm predicts long-term sinus rhythm and clinical improvement after intraoperative ablation of atrial fibrillation]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/610?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Our aim was to compare the long-term effects on rhythm and quality of life (QoL) after left atrial epicardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation vs. no ablation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>Thirty-nine patients with ECG documented atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with or without concomitant valve surgery were consecutively elected for epicardial RF ablation. Thirty-nine age- and gender-matched patients scheduled for CABG with or without concomitant valve surgery only and with documented AF served as controls. The follow-up after ablation was 32 &plusmn; 11 months. The percentage of patients in sinus rhythm (SR) at long-term follow-up was 62 vs. 33% (<I>P</I> = 0.03) after ablation and no ablation, respectively. SR at 3 months was highly predictive of that at 32 months (sensitivity 95%, positive predictive value 86%). Long-term SR was associated with better QoL, fewer symptoms, higher ejection fraction, and smaller left and right atria than AF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>SR at 3 months was highly predictive of long-term SR that was associated with clinical improvement when compared with patients still in AF. AF at 3 months did not preclude a later stabilization to SR.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johansson, B., Houltz, B., Berglin, E., Brandrup-Wognsen, G., Karlsson, T., Edvardsson, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Short-term sinus rhythm predicts long-term sinus rhythm and clinical improvement after intraoperative ablation of atrial fibrillation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>617</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>610</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/618?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term endurance sport practice increases the incidence of lone atrial fibrillation in men: a follow-up study]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/618?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF) in males according to sport practice and to identify possible clinical markers related to LAF among marathon runners.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study was designed. A group of marathon runners (<I>n</I> = 252) and a population-based sample of sedentary men (<I>n</I> = 305) recruited in 1990&ndash;92 and 1994&ndash;96, respectively, were contacted in 2002&ndash;03 and invited to attend an outpatient clinic to identify suggestive symptoms of having experienced an arrhythmia requiring medical attention. In those with suggestive symptoms of atrial fibrillation, medical records were reviewed. Finally, LAF was diagnosed on the basis of the presence of atrial fibrillation in an electrocardiographic recording. In the group of marathon runners, an echocardiogram was performed at inclusion and at the end of the study. The annual incidence rate of LAF among marathon runners and sedentary men was 0.43/100 and 0.11/100, respectively. Endurance sport practice was associated with a higher risk of incident LAF in the multivariate age- and blood pressure-adjusted Cox regression models (hazard ratio = 8.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.26&ndash;61.29). In the group of marathon runners, left atrial inferosuperior diameter and left atrial volume were both associated with a higher risk of incident LAF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Long-term endurance sport practice is associated with a higher risk of symptomatic LAF in men. This risk is associated with a larger left atrial inferosuperior diameter and volume in physically active subjects.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molina, L., Mont, L., Marrugat, J., Berruezo, A., Brugada, J., Bruguera, J., Rebato, C., Elosua, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term endurance sport practice increases the incidence of lone atrial fibrillation in men: a follow-up study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>623</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>618</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPORTS AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/624?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Independent predictive accuracy of classical electrocardiographic criteria in the diagnosis of paroxysmal atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardias in patients without pre-excitation]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/624?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>In patients without pre-excitation, the differential diagnosis of paroxysmal atrioventricular (AV) reciprocating tachycardias consists mainly of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias (AVNRTs) and AV reciprocating tachycardias (AVRTs) through a concealed bypass. Our purpose was to validate the diagnostic accuracy of a predictive logistic model using classical electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>We included 470 patients who underwent an electrophysiological study for paroxysmal, regular, and narrow-QRS complex tachycardia without pre-excitation in sinus rhythm. The ECG recordings were reviewed for the presence of the following: (i) pseudo r' deflection (V1) and/or pseudo s-wave (inferior leads), (ii) identifiable P-wave after the QRS complex, (iii) QRS alternans, and (iv) repolarization abnormalities during tachycardia. We performed a cross-validation method using the first 300 patients to develop a logistic model to predict the tachycardia diagnosis. The model was validated through the remaining 170 patients. The invasive study demonstrated AVNRT in 314 patients and AVRT in 156 patients. The presence of pseudo r' deflection and/or pseudo s-wave, a visible P-wave after the QRS complex, and QRS alternans were selected by a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis as predictors for the diagnosis of AVNRT. The application of the model in the validation group showed a shrinkage prediction factor of 3%. Diagnostic probabilities for both tachycardia mechanisms depending on every combination of selected ECG criteria were &gt;75% in 70% of the patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The presence of pseudo r' deflection and/or pseudo s-wave, an identifiable P-wave after the QRS, and QRS alternans during tachycardia permit us to derive a reliable logistic model to predict the mechanism of paroxysmal AVRT in patients without pre-excitation. Precise probabilities for a correct diagnosis associated with every combination of those classical ECG criteria are presented.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez-Torrecilla, E., Almendral, J., Arenal, A., Atienza, F., del Castillo, S., Fernandez-Aviles, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun084</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Independent predictive accuracy of classical electrocardiographic criteria in the diagnosis of paroxysmal atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardias in patients without pre-excitation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>628</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>624</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/629?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paroxysmal reciprocating supraventricular tachycardia in infants: electrophysiologically guided medical treatment and long-term evolution of the re-entry circuit]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/629?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term prognosis in infants affected by paroxysmal reciprocating supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), to identify predictors of SVT disappearance, and to assess the efficacy of electrophysiologically guided drug therapy in preventing recurrences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>A six step regimen of oral therapy was used in 55 infants with SVT: (i) propafenone (P); (ii) flecainide (F); (iii) flecainide plus propranolol (FP); (iv) amiodarone (A); (v) amiodarone plus propranolol (AP); (vi) amiodarone plus flecainide plus propranolol (AFP). If one step was not successful, the patient was passed on to the next treatment step and so on. Transesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) was used to evaluate treatment efficacy and the evolution of SVT at the end of the first, second, and third year. Propafenone was successful in 32.7% of the patients, F in 14.5%, FP in 23.6%, A alone in 5.4%, and AP in 18.1%; only 7.2% reached step 6. At month 12, after therapy wash out, SVT recurred spontaneously in 2 patients (3.6%) and remained inducible in 25 (45.5%). Inducibility was significantly higher in patients treated with A. At 24 months, SVT was inducible or spontaneous in 86% of the cases and at 36 months in 87%. There were no recurrences using the treatment confirmed by TAP. No further predictor of SVT inducibility was identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Supraventricular tachycardia disappeared in ~50% of the patients during the first year of life and in another 20% thereafter. The necessity for A treatment is the only predictor of persistence of the re-entry circuit during the first year of life. Transesophageal atrial pacing is useful in guiding the medical treatment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drago, F., Silvetti, M. S., De Santis, A., Marcora, S., Fazio, G., Anaclerio, S., Versacci, P., Iodice, F., Di Ciommo, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paroxysmal reciprocating supraventricular tachycardia in infants: electrophysiologically guided medical treatment and long-term evolution of the re-entry circuit]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>635</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>629</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/636?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incessant right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia due to subacute postpartum thyroiditis]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/636?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanga, S., Patel, D., Li, H., Lakkireddy, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incessant right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia due to subacute postpartum thyroiditis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>637</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>636</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/638?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Permanent third-degree atrioventricular block as clinical presentation of an intracardiac bronchogenic cyst]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/638?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Bronchogenic cysts are the most common primary cysts in the mediastinum. However, intracardiac bronchogenic cysts are uncommon. The present case represents a unique situation, in which an intracardiac bronchogenic cyst at the region of the atrioventricular node presented as permanent complete atrioventricular block (AVB) and was associated with the presence of an ostium secundum atrial septal defect.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez-Mateo, V., Arias, M. A., Juarez-Tosina, R., Rodriguez-Padial, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Permanent third-degree atrioventricular block as clinical presentation of an intracardiac bronchogenic cyst]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>640</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>638</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/641?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Wenckebach type block on surface ECG due to infra-Hisian location in a patient with repaired tetralogy of Fallot]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/641?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marijon, E., Combes, N., Boveda, S., Albenque, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Wenckebach type block on surface ECG due to infra-Hisian location in a patient with repaired tetralogy of Fallot]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>642</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>641</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/643?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group]]></title>
<link>http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/5/643?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/europace/eun079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) </dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>645</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>643</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>STATEMENT FROM THE HEART GROUP</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>