Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on September 4, 2008

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eun245
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/11/1308    most recent
eun245v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fatemi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Blanc, J.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fatemi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Blanc, J.-J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Primary failure of cardiac resynchronization therapy: what are the causes and is it worth considering a second attempt? A single-centre experience

Marjaneh Fatemi*, Yves Etienne, Philippe Castellant and Jean-Jacques Blanc

Department of Cardiology, Brest University Hospital, CHU de la Cavale Blanche, Bd Tanguy Prigent, 29609 Brest Cedex, France

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been validated as an effective treatment for patients with drug-refractory congestive heart failure and left bundle branch block. Failure of implantation of the left ventricular (LV) lead has been reported in 10–15% of patients. The goal of our study was to determine the causes of failure and the success rate following a repeat procedure by the same operators.

Methods and results: We reviewed our last 100 consecutive cases of CRT before July 2007. The procedure was considered as unsuccessful if it had to be interrupted before the placement of the LV lead in an appropriate position, because of patient’s haemodynamic status or if the procedure duration exceeded 3 h. Cardiac resynchronization therapy was unsuccessful in 10 patients (5 men, mean age: 72 ± 11 years). The causes of failure of CRT were as follows: no target vein other than the great cardiac vein (n = 5), coronary sinus dissection (n = 1), and a lateral vein too small to provide a stable location for the LV lead (n = 4). A second procedure was attempted in four patients and was successful in all cases.

Conclusion: In our study results, failure of CRT was observed in 10% of the patients. A second procedure can be attempted in a selected group of patients and is associated with a high success rate.

Key Words: Heart failure, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Technical success


* Corresponding author. Tel: +33 2 98 34 73 91/92; fax: +33 2 98 34 73 93. E-mail address: marjaneh.fatemi{at}chu-brest.fr

Manuscript submitted 13 June 2008. Accepted after revision 11 August 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Castellant, M. Fatemi, E. Orhan, Y. Etienne, and J. J. Blanc
Patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and hyper-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: characteristics and long-term evolution
Europace, March 1, 2009; 11(3): 350 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.