Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on August 11, 2008

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eun208
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/11/1313    most recent
eun208v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buck, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Gelder, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buck, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Gelder, I. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Impact of interventricular lead distance and the decrease in septal-to-lateral delay on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Sandra Buck1, Alexander H. Maass1, Wybe Nieuwland1, Rutger L. Anthonio1, Dirk J. Van Veldhuisen1 and Isabelle C. Van Gelder1,2,*

1 Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; 2 The Interuniversity Cardiology Institute Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Aims: To investigate the influence of interlead distance and lead positioning on success of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with advanced chronic heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony. Despite application of established selection criteria, 20–40% of the patients do not respond to CRT.

Methods and results: We examined consecutive patients in whom CRT was implanted. Response to CRT was defined as a decrease in the left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥10% after 6 months. A comparison was made between patients who were responders to CRT and those who were non-responders. A univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed with regard to predictors for response. Between January 2004 and January 2008, 174 patients who were treated with CRT were classified as responders [n = 95 (55%)] or non-responders [n = 79 (45%)]. Responders had a significantly larger horizontal interlead distance on the lateral thoracic X-ray [odds ratio (OR) 2.8 (1.2–6.6), P = 0.01], a septal-to-lateral delay >60 ms [OR 4.9 (2.0–11.4), P < 0.0001], non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy [OR 3.0 (1.3–6.9), P = 0.009], a left ventricular end-diastolic diameter <67 mm [OR 4.2 (1.8–9.9), P = 0.001], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use [OR 8.1 (1.7–38.2), P = 0.008], and no tricuspid valve insufficiency [OR 6.9 (1.3–35.5), P = 0.02]. Post-implantation responders had a significantly greater decrease in the intraventricular delay (septal-to-lateral delay 62 ± 62 vs. 26 ± 65 ms, P = 0.001), but not in the interventricular mechanical delay.

Conclusion: Larger interlead distance on the lateral thoracic X-ray, associated with positioning of the left ventricular lead in the posterior position, is associated with response after 6 months of follow-up. Furthermore, diminishing the septal-to-lateral delay is predictive for response.

Key Words: Congestive heart failure, Artificial pacing, Cardiac resynchronization therapy


* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 50 361 2355; fax: +31 50 361 4391. E-mail address: i.c.van.gelder{at}thorax.umcg.nl

Manuscript submitted 4 June 2008. Accepted after revision 19 July 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. R. Bonakdar, M. V. Jorat, A. F. Fazelifar, A. Alizadeh, N. Givtaj, N. Sameie, A. Sadeghpour, and M. Haghjoo
Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using simple electrocardiographic and echocardiographic tools
Europace, October 1, 2009; 11(10): 1330 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.