Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on October 19, 2007

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eum234
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/12/1171    most recent
eum234v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emkanjoo, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sadr-ameli, M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emkanjoo, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sadr-ameli, M.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Frequency of inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure according to QRS width

Zahra Emkanjoo1,*, M. Esmaeilzadeh2, N. Mohammad Hadi1, A. Alizadeh1, M. Tayyebi1 and M.A. Sadr-ameli1

1 Department of Pacemaker and Electrophysiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Research and Medical Centre, PO Box 1996911151, Tehran, Iran; 2 Department of Echocardiography, Rajaie Cardiovascular Research and Medical Centre, Tehran, Iran

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for heart failure patients with prolongation of QRS duration. Despite careful patient selection, some do not respond to CRT based on QRS complex duration. We sought to evaluate the presence of left ventricular dyssynchrony using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) according to QRS duration in heart failure patients.

Methods and results: Ninety-nine patients (mean age 52.6 ± 15.3 years) with severe heart failure [left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, <35%] were prospectively evaluated. On the basis of QRS width, the patients were divided into two groups. Forty-eight patients (48.5%) had a normal QRS duration (<120 ms), Group I, and 51 (51.5%) had a prolonged QRS duration, Group II. All patients underwent echocardiography coupled with TDI. Spectral displays of six basal and six middle LV segments with pulsed-wave TDI were obtained to assess the time to peak systolic point from R-wave on electrocardiogram (Ts). The standard deviation of Ts (Ts-SD) and the maximal temporal difference of Ts (Ts-diff) were measured. Interventricular dyssynchrony [defined as the presence of an interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) >40 ms] and intra-LV mechanical delays (defined as Ts-SD >33.4 ms and Ts-diff >100 ms) were correlated with the QRS width and morphology. We found a greater IVMD in Group II patients, compared with patients in Group I (42.5 ± 22.3 vs. 26.8 ± 21, respectively, P < 0.001). Intraventricular dyssynchrony defined as Ts-SD ≥33.4 ms was found in 45.1% of patients in Group II compared with 23% of patients in Group I (P = 0.03). Similarly, the Ts-diff was prolonged in Group II patients compared with Group I (P = 0.02). By linear regression analysis, a weak relation was found between Ts-SD and QRS duration (P = 0.055). A substantial portion of patients with prolonged QRS did not exhibit ventricular dyssynchrony defined either as total asynchrony index ≥33.4 ms or as IVMD >40 ms.

Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients with prolonged QRS (32.1%) did not exhibit inter- or intraventricular dyssynchrony, which may represent a limitation in identifying the ideal QRS interval for the selection of patients for CRT.

Key Words: Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Tissue Doppler imaging


* Corresponding author. Tel: +98 21 2391; fax: +98 21 22055594. E-mail address: emkanjoo{at}rhc.ac.ir

Manuscript submitted 12 June 2007. Accepted after revision 26 September 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.