Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on July 13, 2007

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eum130
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/8/645    most recent
eum130v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomaske, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bauersfeld, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomaske, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bauersfeld, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Long-term experience with AutoCapture®-controlled epicardial pacing in children

Maren Tomaske1,*, Paul Harpes2, Rene Pretre3, Ali Dodge-Khatami3 and Urs Bauersfeld1

1 Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland; 2 Biostatistics Unit, University Zurich, Switzerland; 3 Division of Congenital Cardiovascular Surgery, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

Aims To examine the feasibility and safety of AutoCapture (AC)-controlled pacing with epicardial leads in children, and study the effects on device longevity.

Methods A total of 62 children were prospectively enrolled. Pre-discharge testing precluded AC function in six children. In 56 (90%) children, devices with AC-controlled pacing were followed up to 9 years. Calculated battery life in AC-controlled pacing was compared with theoretical calculations, using a two-fold stimulation output of measured thresholds.

Results In 53 of 56 children, no differences were observed for evoked response signals (13.3 vs. 11.5 mV, P=0.20) or lead polarization safety margins (5.5 vs. 4.1, P=0.25) at 6-month and 4-year follow-up. A crossover to conventional pacing was required in 3 of 56 children. AC-controlled pacing prolonged the calculated battery life up to 15% for the identity and integrity devices with 0.95 A h capacity, compared with theoretical conventional settings (P=0.008). In patients with ventricular pacing thresholds >1.5 V at 0.5 ms, battery life was increased by 30% compared with theoretical conventional settings (P<0.001).

Conclusion AC-controlled pacing with epicardial leads is feasible and safe in children during long-term follow-up. An adequate lead polarization safety margin persists in most patients. Calculated battery life was prolonged up to 15% with AC-controlled pacing. Patients with high or fluctuating pacing thresholds benefit the most.

Key Words: Pacemaker, AutoCapture, Safety, Battery service life, Epicardial pacing leads, Pediatric


* Corresponding author. Tel: +41 44 2667747; fax: +41 44 2667981. E-mail address: maren.tomaske{at}kispi.uzh.ch

Manuscript submitted 16 April 2007. Revision received 11 June 2007.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Tomaske, B. Gerritse, L. Kretzers, R. Pretre, A. Dodge-Khatami, M. Rahn, and U. Bauersfeld
A 12-Year Experience of Bipolar Steroid-Eluting Epicardial Pacing Leads in Children
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1704 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. S. Silvetti, A. De Santis, S. Marcora, T. De Santo, N. Grovale, and F. Drago
Circadian pattern of atrial pacing threshold in the young
Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 147 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.