Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on June 15, 2007

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eum100
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/8/662    most recent
eum100v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomaske, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bauersfeld, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomaske, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bauersfeld, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Do daily threshold trend fluctuations of epicardial leads correlate with pacing and sensing characteristics in paediatric patients?

Maren Tomaske1,*, Paul Harpes2, Ali Dodge-Khatami3, Nadja Amacker1 and Urs Bauersfeld1

1 Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland; 2 Biostatistic Unit, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 3 Division of Congenital Cardiovascular Surgery, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

Aims To evaluate whether the magnitude of daily ventricular pacing threshold fluctuations ({Delta}fluctuation) in trend graphs of stored diagrams correlate with ventricular threshold and sensing changes over time.

Methods and results A total of 56 children received AutoCapture® devices (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) connected to steroid-eluting epicardial leads. Maximum lead age at study closure was 12.2 years (median 4.0). Telemetry data and daily {Delta}fluctuation were obtained every 6 months. Regression slope coefficients and mean values of repeated measurements were calculated for each patient's course. High daily {Delta}fluctuation correlated with higher pacing thresholds ({rho} = 0.68, P < 0.001), lower impedances ({rho} = –0.38, P = 0.004), and a {Delta}fluctuation-incline ({rho} = 0.34, P = 0.01) over time. Furthermore, a {Delta}fluctuation-incline correlated with a pacing threshold-incline ({rho} = 0.34, P = 0.01). No correlation was observed for ventricular sensing. Higher daily {Delta}fluctuation were observed if lead age was >5 years compared with ≤5 years (0.75 vs. 0.55 V @ 0.5 ms, P = 0.028).

Conclusion High amplitudes of daily {Delta}fluctuation correlate with higher and increasing pacing thresholds and lower impedances. Theoretically, this results from electrode microinstability on the epicardial surface. A decrease of the steroid-eluting potency of the electrode can be hypothesized to cause higher daily {Delta}fluctuation beyond a lead age of 5 years. Potential implications of marked daily {Delta}fluctuation are short-term follow-up and lead replacement in the presence of high pacing thresholds.

Key Words: Pacemaker, Threshold tracking, AutoCapture, Epicardial pacing leads, Paediatric


* Corresponding author. Tel: +41 44 2667519; fax: +41 44 2667981. E-mail address: maren.tomaske{at}kispi.unizh.ch

Manuscript submitted 10 February 2007. Accepted after revision 23 April 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Tomaske, P. Harpes, N. Woy, and U. Bauersfeld
The efficacy of ventricular pacing with device automaticity in paediatric patients
Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 838 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.