Europace Advance Access published online on May 31, 2007
Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eum080
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems in the CARE-HF trial: procedural success rate and safety
1 Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises, Nantes, France; 2 Departement of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital, Münster, Germany; 3 Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Dipartimento di Cardiologia De Gasperis, Elettrofisiologia, Milano, Italy; 4 Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 5 University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; 6 Département de Cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, Centre cardio-pneumologique, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre hospitalier universitaire, 2, rue Henri le Guilloux, 35033 Rennes Cedex 9, France; 7 Division of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; 8 Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; 9 Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 10 Department of Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston-upon-Hull, UK
Aims To assess procedural characteristics and adjudicated procedure-related (
30 days) major adverse events among patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation in the CARE-HF study. The CARE-HF study shows that CRT improves symptoms and reduces morbidity and mortality in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, safe and proper implantation of pacing systems remains key to effective CRT delivery.
Methods and results Generalized linear modeling was used to examine the relationships between first implant success/failure and: NYHA class; beta-adrenergic blocker use; underlying ischemic vs. non-ischemic heart disease; history of coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery; left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume
vs. >300 cm3; and, influence of the participating study-centres. Implantation was attempted in 404/409 patients assigned to CRT, and in 65/404 patients assigned to medical therapy. Among these 469 patients, 450 (95.9%) received a successfully implanted and activated device. Complications occurred within 24 h in 47 patients (10.0%), mainly lead dislodgments (n = 10, 2.1%) and coronary sinus dissection/perforation (n = 10, 2.1%), and between 24 h and 30 days in 26 patients (5.5%), mainly lead dislodgment (n = 13, 2.8%). Mean LV lead stimulation threshold was significantly higher than at the right atrium or right ventricle, though remained stable, delivering effective, and reliable CRT. Implanting experience was the only predictor of procedural outcome.
Conclusion Transvenous CRT system implantation, using a CS lead designed for long-term LV pacing, was safe and reliable. As implanting centres become more experienced, this success rate is expected to increase further.
Key Words: Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Heart failure, Procedural complications, Operative complications, Left ventricular stimulation
* Corresponding author. Tel: +33 299 282 525; fax: +33 299 282 510. E-mail address: jean-claude.daubert{at}chu-rennes.fr
Manuscript submitted 13 December 2006. Accepted after revision 30 March 2007.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Z. Duray and S. H. Hohnloser Fighting with the invisible: radiation exposure in cardiac resynchronization therapy Europace, December 1, 2009; 11(12): 1575 - 1576. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Auricchio, A. Sorgente, E. Soubelet, F. Regoli, G. Spinucci, R. Vaillant, F. F. Faletra, C. Klersy, and T. Moccetti Accuracy and usefulness of fusion imaging between three-dimensional coronary sinus and coronary veins computed tomographic images with projection images obtained using fluoroscopy Europace, November 1, 2009; 11(11): 1483 - 1490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Morgan and V. Delgado Lead positioning for cardiac resynchronization therapy: techniques and priorities Europace, November 1, 2009; 11(suppl_5): v22 - v28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. W. Borleffs, R. J. van Bommel, S. G. Molhoek, J. G. de Leeuw, M. J. Schalij, and L. van Erven Requirement for coronary sinus lead interventions and effectiveness of endovascular replacement during long-term follow-up after implantation of a resynchronization device Europace, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 607 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Alonso In the field of cardiac resynchronization therapy is left ventricular pacing via the coronary sinus a mature technique Europace, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 544 - 545. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Z. Khan, M. S. Virdee, S. P. Fynn, and D. P. Dutka Left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: where and how? Europace, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 554 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. N. Peterson, S. L. Daugherty, Y. Wang, H. J. Vidaillet, P. A. Heidenreich, J. P. Curtis, F. A. Masoudi, and on behalf of the National Cardiovascular Data Regi Gender Differences in Procedure-Related Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy Circulation, March 3, 2009; 119(8): 1078 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Linde, W. T. Abraham, M. R. Gold, M. St. John Sutton, S. Ghio, C. Daubert, and REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Randomized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization in Mildly Symptomatic Heart Failure Patients and in Asymptomatic Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Previous Heart Failure Symptoms J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 2, 2008; 52(23): 1834 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fatemi, Y. Etienne, P. Castellant, and J.-J. Blanc Primary failure of cardiac resynchronization therapy: what are the causes and is it worth considering a second attempt? A single-centre experience Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(11): 1308 - 1312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hamid, A. Arujuna, and C. A. Rinaldi A case of diaphragmatic pacing with cardiac resynchronization therapy Europace, October 1, 2008; 10(10): 1229 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Goscinska-Bis, J. Bis, M. Krejca, R. Ulczok, P. Szmagala, A. Bochenek, and W. Kargul Totally epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy system implantation in patients with heart failure undergoing CABG Eur J Heart Fail, May 1, 2008; 10(5): 498 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stevenhagen, A. Meijer, F. A. Bracke, and B. M. van Gelder Coronary sinus atresia and persistent left superior vena cava with the presence of thrombus complicating implantation of a left ventricular pacing lead Europace, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 384 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-J. Blanc, J.-C. Daubert, H. Drexler, H. Ector, M. Gasparini, C. Linde, F. B. Morgado, et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 959 - 998. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-J. Blanc, J.-C. Daubert, H. Drexler, H. Ector, M. Gasparini, C. Linde, F. B. Morgado, et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2256 - 2295. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




