Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on January 16, 2007

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eul174
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/2/88    most recent
eul174v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vukomanovic, V.
Right arrow Articles by Milovanovic, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vukomanovic, V.
Right arrow Articles by Milovanovic, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Age-related role of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in risk stratification of patients with complete congenital atrioventricular block

Vladislav Vukomanovic1,*, Mila Stajevic1, Jovan Kosutic1, Petar Stojanov2, Sanja Rakic1, Milos Velinovic2, Igor Sehic1 and Vladimir Milovanovic1

1 Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Mother and Child Health Institute ‘Dr Vukan Cupic’, Radoja Dakica 6–8 street, Belgrade, Serbia, Serbia and Montenegro; 2 Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Aims The aim of the paper was to assess the importance of 24 h electrocardiographic Holter monitoring in determining predictive factors for Adams–Stokes (AS) attacks and heart failure (HF) in children and adolescents with complete congenital atrioventricular block (CCAVB).

Methods and results Forty-five patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of AS attacks and HF and six age-related subgroups. The following parameters of 24 h electrocardiographic Holter monitoring were analysed: (i) minimum heart rate (HR), (ii) maximum HR, (iii) average HR, (iv) daytime HR (v) rhythm and conduction disturbance. Adams–Stokes attacks and HF occurred in 10 and 8 patients, respectively (40%). Five of six neonates with HF had maximum HR < 74 bpm and daytime HR < 58 bpm. Maximum HR below 68 bpm and daytime HR below 52 bpm were recorded in all the children up to 8 years of age with AS attacks and HF and only in 3 of 14 asymptomatic patients. All the patients above 8 years of age with AS attacks had maximum HR below 62 bpm. Of 6 patients with daytime HR < 50 bpm AS attacks were present in two. Episodes of marked ventricular slowing during sleep were registered in 4 of 10 (40%) patients and in 3 of 27 (11%) symptomless patients.

Conclusion Risk factors for development of AS attacks and HF in patients with CCAVB include: (i) maximum HR < 74 bpm in neonates, <68 bpm up to the age of 8 and <62 bpm at ages above 8, (ii) daytime HR <58 bpm in neonates and < 52 bpm till the age of 8, and (iiii) abrupt pauses in ventricular rate that are at least twice the basic cycle length after the neonatal period.

Key Words: Complete congenital atrioventricular block, Adams–Stokes attacks, Heart failure, WPW, Electrocardiographic holter monitoring, Heart rate


* Corresponding author. Tel: +381 11 3108 140; fax: +381 112697232. E-mail address: vvladavuk{at}ptt.yu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
C. S. Chronister
Congenital Complete Atrioventricular Block in a Young Man: A Case Study
Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2009; 29(5): 45 - 56.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. K. Hornberger and K. Collins
New insights into fetal atrioventricular block using fetal magnetocardiography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2008; 51(1): 85 - 86.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.