Europace Advance Access published online on September 14, 2006
Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eul106
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Aims The AFFIRM and RACE studies showed that rate control is an acceptable treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined whether strict rate control offers benefit over more lenient rate control. Methods and Results We compared the outcome of patients enrolled in the rate-control arms of AFFIRM and RACE, using data from patients who met a composite of overlapping inclusion and exclusion criteria. We evaluated 1091 patients, 874 from AFFIRM and 217 from RACE. In AFFIRM, the rate-control strategy aimed for a resting heart rate Conclusion Stringency of the approach to rate control, based on the comparison of the AFFIRM and RACE studies, was not associated with an important difference in clinical events.
Received December 16, 2005
Accepted July 9, 2006
Article
Does intensity of rate-control influence outcome in atrial fibrillation? An analysis of pooled data from the RACE and AFFIRM studies
Isabelle C. Van Gelder 1 *, D. George Wyse 2, Mary L. Chandler 3, Howard A. Cooper 4, Brian Olshansky 5, Vincent E. Hagens 1, and Harry J.G.M. Crijns 6, the RACE and AFFIRM Investigators
2 Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
3 Axio Research Corporation, Seattle, Washington
4 Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
5 University of Iowa Hospital, Iowa City, IA, USA
6 University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Isabelle C. Van Gelder, E-mail: i.c.van.gelder{at}thorax.umcg.nl
![]()
Abstract
80 bpm and heart rate during daily activity of
110 bpm. In RACE, a more lenient approach was taken: resting heart rate <100 bpm. Primary endpoint was a composite of mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization, and myocardial infarction. Mean heart rate across all follow-up visits for patients in AF was lower in AFFIRM (76.1 vs. 83.4 bpm). Event-free survival for the occurrence of the primary endpoint did not differ (64% in AFFIRM vs. 66% in RACE). Patients with mean heart rates during AF within the AFFIRM (
80) or RACE (<100) criteria had a better outcome than patients with heart rates
100 (hazard ratios 0.69 and 0.58, respectively, for
80 and <100 compared with
100 bpm).![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-F. Tse, K.-K. Wong, C.-W. Siu, M.-O. Tang, V. Tsang, W.-Y. Ho, and C.-P. Lau Impacts of ventricular rate regularization pacing at right ventricular apical vs. septal sites on left ventricular function and exercise capacity in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation Europace, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 594 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Camm, P. Kirchhof, G. Y.H. Lip, I. Savelieva, and S. Ernst CHAPTER 29 Atrial Fibrillation ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bajpai, I. Savelieva, and A. J. Camm Treatment of atrial fibrillation Br. Med. Bull., December 5, 2008; (2008) ldn046v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nieuwlaat, L. W. Eurlings, A. Capucci, and H. J.G.M. Crijns Atrial fibrillation in the 'real world': undecided issues Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_I): I122 - I128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fox, J. S. Borer, A. J. Camm, N. Danchin, R. Ferrari, J. L. Lopez Sendon, P. G. Steg, J.-C. Tardif, L. Tavazzi, M. Tendera, et al. Resting Heart Rate in Cardiovascular Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 823 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




