Europace Advance Access published online on August 17, 2006
Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eul093
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Divisione Clinicizzata di Cardiologia, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia di Novara, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Aims The development of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) with QRS morphology discrimination and dual-chamber sensing capabilities has improved the differentiation of supraventricular from ventricular tachycardias (VTs). Inappropriate ICD discharges may result from extracardiac signals caused by electromagnetic interference (EMI), because of electric fields and leakage currents from domestic or medical electrical devices, damaged sensing leads, and various cardiac and extracardiac signals that mimic VT and/or ventricular fibrillation. The aim of our study was to determine retrospectively the incidence and clinical relevance of these ICD behaviours and offer possible therapeutic solutions. Methods and results We have observed inappropriate discharges unrelated to supraventricular arrhythmias in 13 (3.9%) of the 336 patients implanted with ICDs in our centre from 1989 to 2005. Seven patients received inappropriate shocks following exposure to external EMI: improperly grounded electric stove, electrically powered watering system, hydro-massage bath, electrical pruner, electrocautery current during cardiac surgery, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation. In four patients, spurious discharges were related to internal noise of the ICD system from inappropriate lead connections. In two cases, erroneous antitachycardia therapy was delivered following different body signals oversensing (T-wave oversensing, wide QRS double-counting and myopotentials). In nine patients, non-invasive solutions prevented further inappropriate therapies (avoidance of EMI, malfunctioning atrial lead exclusion, ventricular sensing reprogramming). In four patients, surgical revision of the system was required (lead connections or position revision). Conclusion In our experience, inappropriate ICD discharges unrelated to supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in about 4% of ICD patients. A careful evaluation of clinical data and telemetric information (lead impedance, sensed R-wave, stored electrograms) is essential in order to understand the nature of inappropriate ICD discharges and to select the most appropriate solution.
Received February 6, 2006
Accepted May 11, 2006
Article
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges unrelated to supraventricular tachyarrhythmias
Eraldo Occhetta 1 *, Miriam Bortnik 1, Andrea Magnani 1, Gabriella Francalacci 1, and Paolo Marino 1
Eraldo Occhetta, E-mail: occhetta{at}r-j.it
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. C. Digby, M. E. Daubney, J. Baggs, D. Campbell, C. S. Simpson, D. P. Redfearn, F. J. Brennan, H. Abdollah, and A. Baranchuk Physiotherapy and cardiac rhythm devices: a review of the current scope of practice Europace, July 1, 2009; 11(7): 850 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Tzeis, G. Andrikopoulos, C. Kolb, and P. E. Vardas Tools and strategies for the reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(11): 1256 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. P. Abenstein Safety While Swimming in a Sea of Energy Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2007; 82(3): 276 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Gimbel and J. W. Cox Jr Electronic Article Surveillance Systems and Interactions With Implantable Cardiac Devices: Risk of Adverse Interactions in Public and Commercial Spaces Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2007; 82(3): 318 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|