Europace Advance Access published online on June 13, 2006
Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eul067
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Aims The objectives of this study were to identify electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of long-term outcomes after radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with right-ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia. Methods and results We correlated ECG characteristics with RF ablation outcomes in 144 patients with RVOT tachycardia who underwent RF ablation for >1 year. Unfavourable RF ablation outcomes were predefined as unsuccessful RF ablation or recurrence of tachycardia requiring repeated ablation. RF ablation was not successful in 11 (7.6%) patients and 16 (12%) patients had arrhythmia recurrence requiring repeated ablation. Average follow-up time was 72.2 ± 28.4 months. Selected parameters from univariate analysis included number of RF applications, pacemapping, application of bonus burn, procedure time, monophasic R-wave in lead I, QS pattern in leads I and aVL, QRS duration in leads II and V2, and right axis deviation, in ventricular tachycardia. From logistic regression analysis, only monophasic R-wave in lead I remained in the final equation (P=0.004, odds ratio 12.9). Conclusion Monophasic R-wave in lead I during RVOT tachycardia is associated with unfavourable outcomes after RF ablation. This finding may help clinicians in the selection of patients for RF ablation and for the prediction of RF ablation outcome.
Received November 16, 2005
Accepted April 14, 2006
Article
Electrocardiographic predictors of long-term outcomes after radiofrequency ablation in patients with right-ventricular outflow tract tachycardia
Rungroj Krittayaphong 1 *,
Charn Sriratanasathavorn 2,
Chatkanok Dumavibhat 2,
Sachana Pumprueg 1,
Warangkana Boonyapisit 1,
Sukanya Pooranawattanakul 2,
Suteera Phrudprisan 2,
and
Charuwan Kangkagate 3
2 Division of Cardiology, Her Majesty Cardiac Center, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
3 Division of Cardiology, Department of Research Promotion, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Rungroj Krittayaphong, E-mail: sirkt{at}mahidol.ac.th
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Aliot, W. G. Stevenson, J. M. Almendral-Garrote, F. Bogun, C. H. Calkins, E. Delacretaz, P. D. Bella, G. Hindricks, P. Jais, M. E. Josephson, et al. EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: Developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) Europace, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 771 - 817. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Stevenson and K. Soejima Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2750 - 2760. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

