Europace Advance Access published online on May 2, 2006
Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eul040
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Guidant Corporation, Park Lane, Culliganlaan 2B, 1831 Diegem, Brussels, Belgium
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Multiple prospective randomized trials with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) over the past decade have convincingly established the efficacy of ICD therapy in reducing all-cause mortality, by significantly reducing sudden cardiac death. Nevertheless, four trials have failed to show improved survival. Analysing these, in comparison with the positive trials, provides important information concerning the type of patients not likely to receive benefit from ICDs: (i) those with relatively low mortality (
Received August 9, 2005
Accepted March 21, 2006
Article
Lessons learned from neutral ICD trials
Seah Nisam 1 *
and
Günter Breithardt 2
2 Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hospital of the University of Münster, Münster, Germany
Seah Nisam, E-mail: snisam{at}guidant.com
![]()
Abstract
18% within 2 years of follow-up; (ii) those whose mechanism of death is predominantly non-arrhythmic; (iii) patients early (within 6 weeks) after infarction.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?