Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on January 10, 2006

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/euj037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/2/129    most recent
euj037v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pasquié, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Grolleau-Raoux, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pasquié, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Grolleau-Raoux, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved
Received October 29, 2003
Accepted November 9, 2005


Article

Long-term safety and efficacy of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and pre-existing prolonged PR interval

Jean Luc Pasquié 1 *, Joseph Scalzi 1, Jean Christophe Macia 1, Florence Leclercq 1, and Robert Grolleau-Raoux 1

1 Service de Cardiologie A, Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jean Luc Pasquié, E-mail: jl-pasquie{at}chu-montpellier.fr


   Abstract

The association of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and pre-existing prolonged PR interval is unusual. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation in such patients may be associated with an increased risk of immediate and delayed AV block. The aim of our study is to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of slow pathway ablation in this population. We studied 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) with pre-existing prolonged PR interval of 68 consecutive patients with AVNRT. All had slow-fast subtype of AVNRT. The mean PR interval was 222 ± 15 ms before RF. The patients with pre-existing prolonged PR were older (69 ± 15 vs. 54 ± 17, P = 0.008) and their tachycardias were slower (387 ± 102 vs. 323 ± 73 ms; P < 0.05). Transient complete AV block (<5 s) occurred in two patients. None had permanent complete AV block. One patient had a significant increase in PR interval (from 220 to 320 ms). The mean post-RF PR interval was 232 ± 37 ms (P = n.s.). Over a mean follow-up of 39 ± 21 months, none had a recurrence of tachycardia nor developed higher degree AV block. In conclusion, in patients with AVNRT and pre-existing prolonged PR interval, a slow pathway ablation appeared efficient and safe. From our data, no delayed AV block developed on a long follow-up. Most of the patients with periprocedural transient AV block had no evidence of dual AV node physiology, suggesting that, in this population, absence of dual AV node physiology may be associated with a higher risk of AV block during slow pathway ablation.

Keywords: Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia; Follow-up; Atrioventricular block; Radiofrequency ablation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Bortone, S. Boveda, S. Jandaud, N. Combes, J.-P. Donzeau, E. Marijon, and J.-P. Albenque
Gradual power titration using radiofrequency energy: a safe method for slow-pathway ablation in the setting of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia
Europace, February 1, 2009; 11(2): 178 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.