Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on January 16, 2007
Europace 2007 9(2):94-97; doi:10.1093/europace/eul172
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/2/94    most recent
eul172v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakhtiary, F.
Right arrow Articles by Kleine, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bakhtiary, F.
Right arrow Articles by Kleine, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


SYNCOPE

Medium-term follow-up and modes of failure following epicardial pacemaker implantation in young children{dagger}

Farhad Bakhtiary1,*, Omer Dzemali1, Christian K. Bastanier2, Anton Moritz1 and Peter Kleine1

1 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery of Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt/Main, Germany; 2 Department of Pediatric Cardiology Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Aims Young children suffering from congenital or post-operative AV-block require life-long pacemaker stimulation. Due to the anatomical prerequisites initially epicardial electrodes are implanted and the generator is placed in the upper abdominal wall. The following study investigated modes of failure leading to reoperation in this group of technically challenging patients.

Methods and results Between October 2000 and May 2005, a total of 21 infants (age 3 days to 5 years) underwent pacemaker implantation using a subxyphoidal incision for newborns (and a partial lower or complete median sternotomy for older children). Nine patients had previous cardiac surgery for complex congenital defects. The remaining 12 young children suffered from congenital AV-Block (CAVB). Twenty-one bipolar epicardial electrodes (Medtronic Capsure® epi) were fixed to the right ventricle, 15 had additional implantation of a bipolar atrial lead. The pacemaker generator (Medtronic Kappa® 701) was implanted into the right upper abdominal wall. Indications for revision were recorded. No mortality was observed; pacing and sensing parameters remained stable up to a 5-year follow-up. A total of four reoperations occurred. Three of the four revisions were caused by ventricular electrode fracture. At revision, two electrodes were broken at the crossing between the pericardial cavity and the abdominal wall, one bipolar lead at the Y-division into the two tip electrodes. One reoperation was due to a pacemaker recall. All revisions were performed without complications.

Conclusion In our institute epicardial pacing in young children was associated with a satisfactory clinical outcome, but also a significant number of failures leading to reoperation, mainly due to electrode fracture caused by the muscular activity of this patient group. Reoperations were performed at a low risk.

Key Words: Pacemakers, Infants, Epicardial leads


* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 69 6301 6527; fax: +49 69 6301 83279. E-mail address: farhad{at}bakhtiary.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Celiker, F. Aliyev, C. Turkoglu, and I. Gunay
Complete transection of epicardial pacing lead during pregnancy
Europace, September 4, 2008; (2008) eun247v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.