Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2007
Europace 2007 9(10):951-956; doi:10.1093/europace/eum128
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/10/951    most recent
eum128v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furushima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Aizawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Furushima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Aizawa, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


MISCELLANEOUS

Comparison of conduction delay in the right ventricular outflow tract between Brugada syndrome and right ventricular cardiomyopathy: investigation of signal average ECG in the precordial leads

Hiroshi Furushima*, Masaomi Chinushi, Kazuki Okamura, Kenichi Iijima, Satoru Komura, Yasutaka Tanabe, Shinsuke Okada, Daisuke Izumi and Yoshifusa Aizawa

The First Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata University School of Medicine, 1-754 Asahi-machi-dori, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan

Background In both Brugada syndrome (BS) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), electrical abnormalities in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) are important for arrhythmogenesis.

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare conduction delay in the right ventricular in BS with that in ARVC using the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

Methods Twenty patients with BS (18 men and 2 women; 55 ± 12 years old; 9 symptomatic and 11 asymptomatic) and eight patients with ARVC (six men and two women; 53 ± 16 years old) were included. We assessed the presence of late potentials (LPs) and the filtered QRS duration (fQRSd) in V2 and V5 using a high-pass filter of 40 Hz (fQRSd:40) and 100 Hz (fQRSd:100).

Results In ARVC, there was no significant difference in fQRSd:40 between V2 and V5 (158 ± 19 vs. 145 ± 17 ms, respectively): however, in BS, fQRSd:40 in V2 was significantly longer than fQRSd:40 in V5 (147 ± 15 vs. 125 ± 10 ms, P < 0.001). In ARVC, there was no significant difference between fQRSd:40 and fQRSd:100 in V2 and V5 (158 ± 19 vs. 142 ± 23 ms and 145 ± 17 vs. 132 ± 9 ms, respectively). In contrast, in BS, fQRSd:100 was significantly shorter than fQRSd:40 in V2 (110 ± 8 ms vs. 147 ± 15, P < 0.001). The relative decrease in fQRSd:100 compared with fQRSd:40 in V2 was significantly greater in BS than in ARVC.

Conclusion The dominant prolongation of the fQRSd in the right precordial lead in BS was different from the characteristics of ARVC, which may be caused by the conduction delay due to fibro-fatty replacement in RV.

Key Words: Brugada syndrome, ARVC, Signal-averaged ECG, RV outflow tract, Delayed potential


* Corresponding author. Tel: +81 25 227 2185; fax: +81 25 227 0774. E-mail address: chimiri{at}med.niigata-u.ac-jp

Manuscript submitted 2 May 2007. Accepted after revision 8 June 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Aizawa, M. Chinushi, M. Tagawa, H. Furushima, S. Okada, K. Iijima, D. Izumi, H. Watanabe, and S. Komura
A Post-QRS Potential in Brugada Syndrome: Its Relation to Electrocardiographic Pattern and Possible Genesis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 29, 2008; 51(17): 1720 - 1721.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.