Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on February 10, 2006
Europace 2006 8(3):161-167; doi:10.1093/europace/euj028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/3/161    most recent
euj028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diem, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hanrath, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diem, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hanrath, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


ICDS

First multi-centre evaluation of a knowledge-based implant-assistant for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Bjoern Henrik Diem1,2, Volker Lang3, Anil Martin Sinha1, Michael Mlynski4, Christoph Stellbrink1,*, Walter Ameling4 and Peter Hanrath1

1 Department of CardiologyUniversity Hospital AachenAachen Germany ; 2 Biotronik GmbH & Co KGBerlin Germany ; 3 MSEILake Oswego, OR USA ; 4 CWAAachen Germany

Aims Modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) place increasing demands on the physician, as their complexity requires more and more knowledge and effort in handling them. To overcome this problem an implant-assistant has been developed, which transfers clinical data entered by the physician into a complete set of parameters for programming a dual-chamber ICD (Tachos-DR, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) at DFT testing (DFT-Prog) and first permanent programming (Perm-Prog) after implant.

Methods and results Routine ICD implantations were initially evaluated by clinical experts at 19 centres in USA and Europe from 178 patient files. The rating of parameters was related to the number of parameters available in each patient. For DFT-Prog, 98.4% of parameter suggestions were identical to experts' expectations, an additional 1.0% were accepted, 0.5% were rejected, and none was considered harmful. This resulted in an overall acceptance of 94.4% of the DFT-Prog. For Perm-Prog, 96.1% of parameters were identical to those advised by experts, an additional 2.4% were accepted, 1.5% rejected, and seven parameters (0.04%) were considered potentially harmful by experts with an overall acceptance of 86.5%. Adaptation of the implant-assistant increased the overall acceptance to 100% for DFT-Prog and 90.6% for first Perm-Prog without any potentially harmful suggestions.

Conclusion The ICD implant-assistant, which allows the physician to programme ICDs directly from clinical data, is a promising method to simplify the programming of modern ICDs.

Key Words: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Implant-assistant, Knowledge-based system, Expert system, Education


* Corresponding author: Klinik für Kardiologie und Intensivmedizin, Städtische Kliniken Bielefeld, 33604 Bielefeld, Germany. Tel: +49 521 5813401; fax: +49 521 5813499. E-mail address: christoph.stellbrink{at}sk-bielefeld.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
C. Stellbrink and H.-J. Trappe
The follow-up of cardiac devices: what to expect for the future?
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_I): I113 - I115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.