Skip Navigation

Europace 2006 8(1):7-15; doi:10.1093/europace/euj022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laurent, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laurent, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY

Simple and efficient identification of conduction gaps in post-ablation recurring atrial flutters

Gabriel Laurent1,*, Christian De Chillou2, Géraldine Bertaux1, Isabelle Magnin Poull2, Alexandra Martel1, Marius Andronache2, Stéphane Fromentin1, Michel Fraison1, Stéphanie Gonzalez1, François Saint Pierre1, Etienne Aliot2 and Jean Eric Wolf1

Department of Cardiology University Hospital Dijon, Hôpital Bocage, 3 Bd de Lattre de Tassigny, 21000 Dijon France ; Department of Cardiology University Hospital Nancy France

Aims Cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a curative therapy for common atrial flutter (AFl), but is associated with a recurrence rate of 5–26%. Although complete bidirectional conduction block is usually achieved, the recurrence of AF is due to recovered conducting isthmus tissue through which activation wavefronts pass. We evaluated a simple and efficient electrophysiological strategy, which pinpoints the ablation target.

Methods and results Twenty-five patients (19 men), mean age 61±6, with recurrent AFl required a repeat ablation, 250±160 days after a successful RF CTI procedure. Transverse CTI conduction was monitored during AFl or coronary sinus (CS) pacing by a 24-pole mapping catheter positioned in the right atrium (RA), with the distal poles in the CS, proximal poles on the lateral RA, and intermediate poles on the CTI. A slow conduction area traversing the CTI (velocity, 37±22 vs. 98±26 cm/s on either side, P<0.05) and a lower potential amplitude than at both sides (0.2±0.15 vs. 0.5±0.5 mV, P<0.05), defined by a bayonet-shaped depolarization sequence, were considered to represent the incomplete line of block (InLOB). An ablation catheter was progressively dragged up to this InLOB, from the tricuspid annulus to the inferior vena cava, analysing the widely separated double potentials (DPs) until these coalesced. In nine patients (35%), the target conduction gap was a coalesced fractionated atrial potential within the InLOB (duration, 77±12 ms), and in 16 patients (65%), a narrow DP toward the healthy margins of this InLOB (duration, 28±15 ms). Adopting this strategy yields 100% successful re-ablation of recurring AFl leading to bidirectional block, with a mean 2.7±1.4 RF applications.

Conclusion Transverse CTI mapping precisely locates the InLOB and helps find conduction gaps along the CTI in re-ablation procedures for common AFl.

Key Words: Recurrent atrial flutter, Conduction gaps, Catheter ablation, Arrhythmia


Corresponding author. Tel:+33 3 80 29 33 11; fax: +33 3 80 29 33 33. E-mail address:gaby.nathalie{at}free.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.