Skip Navigation

Europace 2004 6(2):159-164; doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2003.11.007
© 2004 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buob, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buob, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Clinical value of routine predischarge testing after ICD-implantation

Axel Buoba,*, Stephanos Siaplaourasa, Dietmar Tschollb, Hans-Joachim Schäfersb, Michael Böhma and Jens Junga

aDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Saarland Homburg, Germany; bDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Saarland Homburg, Germany

AIMS: After implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) predischarge testing is often performed to ensure appropriate therapy function. Nevertheless there is no proven evidence for the necessity of this examination. In this retrospective single-centre analysis we investigated the clinical value of routine predischarge testing.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Predischarge testing was performed in 161 patients 6±2 days after primary implantation of an ICD. There were no complications related to ICD-testing. In 17 of 161 patients (11%) there was at least one pathological finding. In 4 of 17 patients we observed a defibrillation energy requirement (DER) with a safety margin of less than 10 J. In two of these patients an early lead repositioning was undertaken and in two patients reversal of the shock polarity was used to achieve an adequate DER. In 13 of 17 patients we detected a distinct deviation of pacing thresholds or R-wave sensing amplitudes. In two of these patients an early electrode repositioning was performed because of lead displacement. In the remaining 11 patients we found an adequate DER at first, whereas in two patients a further lead repositioning was still necessary during follow-up. In 144 of 161 patients (89%) predischarge testing was without pathological findings. None of these patients needed revision of the ICD-lead during a mean follow-up of 24±13 months.

CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal measurements during predischarge testing are not rare findings in ICD-recipients. Noninvasive methods cannot rule out inadequate defibrillation function. A normal predischarge test seems to be a reliable predictor for a stable electrode function during the first years of follow-up.

Key Words: implantable cardioverter/defibrillator, predischarge testing, defibrillation energy requirement, lead dislodgement


*Corresponding author. Medizinische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik, Innere Medizin III, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. Tel.: +49-6841-1623000; fax: +49-6841-1623394. E-mail address: buob{at}med-in.uni-saarland.de (A. Boub).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.