© 2004 by European Society of Cardiology
IMAGES IN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Detection by intracardiac echocardiography of early formation of left atrial thrombus during pulmonary vein isolation
Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cardiac Arrhythmia Service 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
Manuscript submitted 17 July 2003. Accepted after revision 7 November 2003.
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-617-724-1141; fax: +1-617-726-8604. E-mail address: dkeane{at}stjames.ie (D. Keane).
A 50-year-old man with no history of thromboembolism was brought to the electrophysiology laboratory for a pulmonary vein isolation procedure for atrial fibrillation. After femoral sheath access was obtained, a bolus of 5000 I.U. heparin was given intravenously. Transseptal catheterization was then performed with separate punctures and sheaths for a circumferential pulmonary vein mapping catheter (Lasso—Biosense Webster) and a radiofrequency ablating catheter (4 mm Carto—Biosense Webster). Immediately following transseptal catheterization the two transseptal sheaths were continuously flushed at 60 ml/h of heparinized saline and an another 3000 I.U. of heparin was given as a bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 1500 I.U. of heparin per hour. Baseline anatomical pull-backs of the pulmonary veins on Carto mapping were then performed under intracardiac echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance.
Prior to ablation and 15 min after transseptal catheterization, the activated clotting time (ACT) was found to be 211 s—significantly below our target ACT of 300 s. At this point, a thin, mobile, freshly formed thrombus attached at its base to the shaft of the mapping catheter (Lasso) was detected on intracardiac echo (Fig. 1). Additional boluses of heparin were given. A total of 15,000 I.U. of heparin boluses were required before the ACT reached its target of 300 s and a maintenance infusion of 2500 I.U. of heparin per hour was required to maintain the ACT at this level throughout the procedure.
|
After administration of the additional heparin boluses as above, the transseptal sheath containing the mapping catheter was aspirated as the mapping catheter was simultaneously withdrawn back into the sheath and removed. The mapping catheter was carefully inspected and no loss of integrity of its coating was detected. After the target ACT of 300 s was achieved, no further thrombus formation occurred and the procedure was resumed and all four pulmonary veins were isolated. Intraprocedural aspirin and clopidogrel were also given per our routine protocol. The procedure was well tolerated and without any complication or evidence of embolization and the patient went home after two days of intravenous anticoagulation in sinus rhythm.
This finding supports a policy of ensuring that the ACT target range is achieved rapidly after transseptal catheterization [1]
. This clinical finding is consistent with the observations by Dorbala and colleagues that surrogate markers of thrombus formation (TAT and F1+2) and fibrinolysis (D-dimers) are increased significantly by placement of electrophysiology recording catheters alone prior to radiofrequency ablation [2]. These findings also lend support to consideration of pretreating patients with inhibitors of platelet aggregation prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures as reported by Manolis et al. [3]. The possible advantages gained in so doing must be balanced by an anticipated greater risk of cardiac tamponade.
References
[1] Zhou L., Keane D., Reed G., Ruskin J. Thromboembolic complications of cardiac radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1999; 10: 611–620.[Web of Science][Medline]
[2] Dorbala S., Cohen A., Hutchinson L, Menchavez-Tan E., Steinberg J. Does radiofrequency ablation induce a prethrombotic state? Analysis of coagulation system activation and comparison to electrophysiology study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9: 1152–1160.[Web of Science][Medline]
[3] Manolis A.S., Maounis T., Vassilikos V, Melita-Manolis H., Psarros L., Terzoglou G., et al. Pretreatment with antithrombotic agents during radiofrequency catheter ablation: a randomized comparison of aspirin versus ticlopidine. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9: 1144–1151.[Web of Science][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Blendea, C. D. Barrett, E. K. Heist, J. N. Ruskin, and M. C. Mansour Right Atrial Thrombus Aspiration Guided by Intracardiac Echocardiography During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, August 1, 2009; 2(4): e18 - e20. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. F. Scholten and L. J. Jordaens Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: still investigational or already an established therapy? Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(2): 79 - 82. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Jordaens Treatment of atrial fibrillation by catheter-based procedures Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(s1): S30 - S35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||