© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
Distinction between atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia and atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia in the adult population based on P wave location
Should we reconsider the value of some ECG criteria according to gender and age?
1Cardiovascular Department Hôpital de la Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland; 2Division of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Lausanne, Switzerland
AIMS: Distinction between atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) is sometimes difficult using location of retrograde P waves on ECG.
METHODS: P wave location was retrospectively determined in 137 anterior slow-fast AVNRT (85%) and 26 orthodromic AVRT (15%) with narrow QRS occurring in 161 successive patients without pre-excitation. Mechanism of arrhythmia was assessed by electrophysiological study and confirmed by the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation. P waves were classified as invisible, visible after the QRS, or as R' in V1 and/or S in II. Correlations with arrhythmia mechanism were made according to gender and age (> or 
65 years old).
RESULTS: Mechanism was related to gender but not to age, with a higher proportion of AVNRT in women (89/97, 91%) than in men (48/66, 72%) (P=0.001). AVRT presented with visible P waves in 26/26 cases (100%) while AVNRT presented with invisible P waves in 36/137 (27%), R'V1/SII in 79/137 (57%) and visible P waves in 22/137 (16%). P wave location during AVNRT was related to age but not to gender, with a higher proportion of AVNRT with visible P waves in elderly than in younger patients: 8/27 (29%) vs 14/110 (12%) (P=0.03). Visible P wave during AVNRT was mainly caused by a delay in nodal retrograde conduction in 17/22 patients (77%). Mechanism of tachycardia with visible P waves was related to gender (AVNRT in 14/22 women (64%), AVRT in 18/26 men (70%),P =0.02) and to age, although non-significantly (AVNRT in 8/13 (62%) old vs 14/35 (40%) young patients, P=0.18). A visible P wave was predictive of AVNRT in 25% and in 60% of the men and women younger than 65 years old, and in 50% and in 71% of older men and women respectively (P=0.08 — borderline significance).
CONCLUSIONS: Correct distinction between anterior slow-fast AVNRT and orthodromic AVRT can be reliably made regardless of gender or age in case of R'V1/SII or invisible P wave. AVRT as the expected mechanism should be reconsidered in the case of visible P waves in the elderly and in the female gender in the absence of pre-excitation.
Key Words: Atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia, atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia, retrograde atrio-ventricular conduction, retrograde P wave, gender, age
Correspondence: P. Maury, Cardiologie, Hopital de Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, Toulouse, France. Tel.: (33) 561322094; Fax: (33) 561322246.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Gonzalez-Torrecilla, J. Almendral, A. Arenal, F. Atienza, L. F. Atea, S. del Castillo, and F. Fernandez-Aviles Combined Evaluation of Bedside Clinical Variables and the Electrocardiogram for the Differential Diagnosis of Paroxysmal Atrioventricular Reciprocating Tachycardias in Patients Without Pre-Excitation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 23, 2009; 53(25): 2353 - 2358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Ballo, D. Bernabo, and S. A. Faraguti Heart rate is a predictor of success in the treatment of adults with symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1310 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|