Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on February 13, 2008
Europace 2008 10(3):327-333; doi:10.1093/europace/eun024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/3/327    most recent
eun024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coenen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Osswald, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coenen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Osswald, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


PACING

Closed loop stimulation and accelerometer-based rate adaptation: results of the PROVIDE study

Martin Coenen1,*, Klaus Malinowski2, Wilhelm Spitzer3, Andreas Schuchert4, Dietmar Schmitz5, Michael Anelli-Monti6, Sebastian K.G. Maier7, Werner Estlinbaum8, Alexander Bauer9, Holger Muehling10, Franz Kalscheur11, Klaus Puerner12, Jan Boergel13 and Stefan Osswald1

1 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; 2 Helios Clinic, Aue, Germany; 3 District Hospital, Neustadt/Aisch, Germany; 4 Friedrich-Ebert Hospital, Neumuenster, Germany; 5 St Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Germany; 6 Medical University Clinic, Graz, Austria; 7 Department of Cardiology, University of Wuerzburg, Germany; 8 Cantonal Hospital, Liestal, Switzerland; 9 Medical University Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany; 10 Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Munich, Germany; 11 St Agnes Hospital, Bocholt, Germany; 12 Regional Hospital, Ebersberg, Germany; 13 St Josef Hospital, Bochum, Germany

Aims: We compared pacing rate adaptation based on closed loop stimulation (CLS) or accelerometer sensor (AS) during acute mental and physical stress in the same patient.

Methods and results: One month after Protos (Biotronik, Germany) pacemaker implantation, 131 chronotropically incompetent patients were randomized to AS or CLS for 3 months with crossover. Arithmetic and 6 min walk tests were performed in the non-rate-adaptive mode and AS and CLS rate-adaptive modes, respectively. At the end, patients had to select the individually preferred pacemaker sensor. Heart rate during mental stress was higher (3.0 ± 9.2 bpm) in the CLS than in the AS mode (P = 0.004). Benefit in the walking distance compared with non-rate-adaptive pacing was similar for the two modes: added 27 ± 96 m (AS, P = 0.013) and 30 ± 116 m (CLS, P = 0.025). At the end of the walk, heart rate was higher by 4.8 ± 21.4 bpm in AS than in CLS (P = 0.049). Twice as many patients preferred CLS over AS (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: The arithmetic test was associated with a significantly higher heart rate for CLS than for AS, showing a greater sensitivity of CLS-based rate adaptation to mental stress. Performance during physical stress was comparable. Patients preferred CLS.

Key Words: Rate-adaptive pacing, Chronotropic incompetence, Closed loop stimulation, Accelerometer sensor, Mental stress, Physical stress


* Corresponding author. Tel: +41 61 265 2525; fax: +41 61 265 4598. E-mail address: mcoenen{at}uhbs.ch

Manuscript submitted 19 September 2007. Accepted after revision 12 January 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.