Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2007
Europace 2008 10(1):46-47; doi:10.1093/europace/eum261
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/1/46    most recent
eum261v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogelgesang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vogelgesang, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogelgesang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vogelgesang, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


PACING

Pacemaker-induced ventricular tachycardia

Dirk Vogelgesang1 and Silke Vogelgesang2,*

1 Department of Cardiology, University of Greifswald/Practice of Cardiology, Greifswald, Germany; 2 Department of Pathology, University of Greifswald, Loefflerstr. 23e, 17475 Greifswald, Germany

Manuscript submitted 19 September 2007. Accepted after revision 6 November 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 3834 865716; fax: +49 3834 865704. E-mail address: silke.vogelgesang{at}uni-greifswald.de

Key Words: Pacemaker, Sudden death, Ventricular tachycardia, Atrioventricular delay

A 53-year-old man died suddenly while playing soccer. Two years before, a dual chamber pacemaker including a rate adaptive sensor (DDDR) was implanted to alleviate sick sinus syndrome with symptomatic sinus bradycardia. Autopsy failed to disclose a morphological cause of sudden death. The pacemaker and its leads were correctly placed. Pacemaker interrogation 3 months prior to death revealed normal battery voltage as well as normal thresholds, impedances, and intrinsic amplitudes. The stored intracardiac cardiogram (Figure 1) identified pacemaker-induced ventricular tachycardia (VT) as the reason for sudden death. After normal pacemaker activity, an atrial sensing during the post-ventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP; arrow 1) elicited an ineffective atrial stimulation (AP-SR). The following native ventricular beat (arrow 2) could not be detected by the device because it occurred during the cross-chamber blanking period (40 ms). Consequently, after the atrioventricular delay was complete, a ventricular pacing artifact was delivered (arrow 3), inducing fatal VT.


Figure 1
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Stored intracardiac cardiogram showing pacemaker-induced ventricular tachycardia. After normal pacemaker activity, an atrial sensing during the post-ventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP; arrow 1) elicited an ineffective atrial stimulation (AP-SR). The following native ventricular beat (arrow 2) could not be detected by the device because it occurred during the cross-chamber blanking period (40 ms). Consequently, after the atrioventricular delay was complete, a ventricular pacing artifact was delivered (arrow 3), inducing fatal ventricular tachycardia (VT).

 
The underlying event for the VT seems to be the presence of ectopic ventricular complexes and functional undersensing of atrial and ventricular signals. The functional undersensing of the atrial signal is caused by the programmed dynamic PVARP of 350 ms. Functional undersensing of the ventricular signal is caused by the ventricular blanking time. To avoid pacemaker-induced VT, AAI-pacemakers should be preferred in sick sinus node syndrome. Pacemakers should include a ‘ventricular safety pacing’ function delivering a ventricular stimulus very early (110 ms) after a sensed ventricular signal in the first portion of the AV-interval, thus avoiding both cross-talk and pacemaker-induced VT. Furthermore, the ventricular blanking period should be programmed to be as short as possible to minimize the risk of functional ventricular undersensing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/1/46    most recent
eum261v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogelgesang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vogelgesang, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogelgesang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vogelgesang, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?