Skip Navigation

Europace 2003 5(2):175-183; doi:10.1053/eupc.2002.0299
© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cools, F. J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Verpooten, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cools, F. J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Verpooten, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Stability of far field R wave signals in different conditions

F. J. C. Cools1, R. R. C. van Twembeke2, J. Backers2 and G. A. Verpooten3

1AZ KLINA, Dep. of Cardiology Augustijnslei 100, 2930 Brasschaat, Belgium; 2Univ. Hospital Antwerp, Dep. of Nephrology Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium; 3Biotronik Belgium Plejadenlaan 19, 1200, Brussel, Belgium

AIMS: The presence of far field R wave sensing (FFRS) is usually evaluated in patients with dual chamber pacemakers in supine position. To check if this approach is valid, we tested whether FFRS is consistent both in terms of amplitude threshold and timing characteristics in different daily life conditions.

METHODS AND RESULTS: In 42 patients with a DDD pacemaker, the presence, amplitude threshold and timing parameters of FFRS were therefore determined, with patients supine, standing and at peak exercise. Measurements were made of paced and sensed R waves, in unipolar and bipolar sensing configurations (at peak exercise only paced R waves and bipolar sensing).

After paced R waves (bipolar sensing) amplitude thresholds/time of FFRS after Vpace were 0·32±0·18 mV/119–139 ms (supine), 0·32±0·16 mV/114–130 ms (upright) and 0·27±0·13 mV/121–136 ms (exercise) — with unipolar sensing, this was 0·49±0·27 mV/101–150 ms (supine), 0·51±0·29 mV/100–144 ms (upright).

After sensed R waves (bipolar sensing) amplitude thresholds/time of FFRS after Vsense were 0·27±0·18 mV/24–42 ms (supine), 0·29±0·16 mV/18 to 41 ms (upright) — with unipolar sensing, thresholds were 0·59±0·32 mV/3–50 ms (supine), 0·59±0·36 mV/2–58 ms (upright).

CONCLUSION: given the lower FFRS thresholds with bipolar sensing, bipolar sensing is superior in avoiding FFRS compared with unipolar sensing. No differences were found in terms of amplitude thresholds and timing characteristics with patients supine, standing and at peak exercise. Thus, measurements made in the supine position are basically sufficient to predict the presence/absence of FFRS under different conditions.

Key Words: Oversensing, far-field, exercise, upright


*Correspondence: Frank Cools, AZ KLINA, Dep. of Cardiology, Augustijnslei 100, 2930 Brasschaat Belgium. Tel.: 32-3-6505144; Fax: 32-3-2189099; E-mail: frankcools{at}skynet.be; Univ. Hospital Antwerp, Dep. of Nephrology, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; Biotronik Belgium, Plejadenlaan 19, 1200 Brussel, Belgium.


[1] Moss AJ, Rivers RJ Jr, Kramer DH. Permanent pervenous atrial pacing from the coronary vein. Long term follow-up. Circulation 1974; 49: 222–225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[2] Timmis GC, Westveer DC, Gadowski G. The effect of electrode position on atrial sensing for physiologically responsive cardiac pacemakers. Am Heart J 1984; 108: 909–916.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[3] Brouwer J, Nagelkerke D, den Heijer P, et al. Analysis of atrial far-field ventricular signals: A reassessment. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997; 20: 916–922.[CrossRef][Medline]

[4] Fröhlig G, Berg M, Kusch O, et al. Bipolar ventricular far field sensing in the atrium: any impact of lead position (septum versus free wall) or tip to ring spacing (10 versus 30 mm)? (abstract). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 876.

[5] Adler SW, Brown ML, Nelson LK, et al. Interelectrode spacing and right atrial location, both influence far-field ventricular electrogram amplitude. (abstract). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 877.

[6] Okreglicki A, Kim CH, Akiyama T, et al. Atrial lead position: The effect on measured farfield ventricular signals. (abstract). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 21: 876.

[7] Fröhlig G, Helwani Z, Kusch O. Bipolar ventricular far-field signals in the atrium. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 1604–1613.[Medline]

[8] Shandling AH, Castellanet MJ, Messenger JC, et al. Utility of the atrial endocardial electrogram concurrent with dual-chamber pacing in the determination of a pacemaker-mediated arrhythmia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 1419–1425.[Medline]

[9] Schüller H, Rueter J, Clausson E, et al. Far-field R-wave sensing — An old problem reappearing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 631 (abstract).

[10] Fröhlig G, Kindermann M, Heisel A, et al. Mode switch without atrial tachyarrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 592 (abstract).

[11] Wolpert C, Jung W, Scholl C, et al. Electrical proarrhythmia: Induction of inappropriate atrial therapies due to far-field R-wave oversensing in a new dual-chamber defibrillator. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9: 859–863.[Web of Science][Medline]

[12] Betts TR, Allen S, Roberts PR, Morgan JM. Inappropriate shock therapy in a heart failure defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24: 238–240.[Medline]

[13] Curwin JH, Roelke M, Ruskin JN. Inhibition of bradycardia pacing caused by Far-Field atrial sensing in a third generation cardioverter defibrillator with an automatic gain feature. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 124–126.[CrossRef][Medline]

[14] Taieb J, Benchaa T, Foltzer E, Coste A, Tarlet JM, Jouve B, Rahal Y, Pochon P, Moudni F, Barnay C. Atrioventricular cross-talk in biventricular pacing: a potential cause of ventricular standstill. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25: 929–935.[Medline]

[15] Fröhlig G, Blank W, Schwerdt H. Atrial sensing performance of AV universal pacemakers during exercise. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 47–60.[Medline]

[16] Griffin JC. Sensing characteristics of the right atrial appendage electrode. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1983; 6: 22–25.[Medline]

[17] Kleinert M, Elmqvist H, Strandberg H. Spectral properties of atrial and ventricular endocardial signals. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1979; 2: 11–19.[Medline]

[18] Brandt J and Worzewski W. Far-Field QRS complex sensing: prevalence and timing with bipolar atrial leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 315–320.[Medline]

[19] Cools F, Van Twembeke R, Hemelhof H, Backers J. Feasibility of using atrial sensitivities below 0·5 mV in DDD(R) pacemaker with mode switching algorithm. Prog Biomed Res 1999; 4: 303–306.

[20] Backers J, Timmermans W, Goethals MA. Mode switching failure during atrial flutter: the "2:1 lock-in" phenomenon. Europace Suppl 2000; 1: D 90 86P/33.

[21] Bonner M, Krebs A, Olson WH. Orthogonal atrial lead reduces far field R wave. (abstract). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24: 707.

[22] Theres H, Sun W, Combs W, Panken E, Mead H, Baumann G, Stangl K. P-wave and far-field R wave detection in pacemaker patient atrial electrograms. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 434–440.[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
E. Lewicka-Nowak, A. Kutarski, A. Dabrowska-Kugacka, P. Rucinski, P. Zagozdzon, and G. Raczak
Atrial lead location at the Bachmann's bundle region results in a low incidence of far field R-wave sensing
Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 138 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Nash, G. Fröhlig, M. Taborsky, E. Stammwitz, F. Maru, L.H.M. Bouwens, and C. Çeliker
Rejection of atrial sensing artifacts by a pacing lead with short tip-to-ring spacing
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cools, F. J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Verpooten, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cools, F. J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Verpooten, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?