© 2003 by European Society of Cardiology
Sensing issues related to the clinical use of implantable loop recorders
Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion Crete, Greece
AIMS: The newer insertable loop recorder device (Reveal Plus 9526, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis MN, U.S.A.) is equipped with auto-activation capabilities. In this study we investigated whether the new device encounters sensitivity problems in the form of oversensing or undersensing. We also tested whether body position changes influence the sensed electrogram's amplitude, therefore affecting the device's autosensing ability.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 32 patients aged 58·1±11·7 years with a loop recorder implanted either in the left parasternal or in the heart's apex area, to investigate undiagnosed syncopal episodes after initial assessment.
During the follow-up period (5·7±2·7 months), that began 6 months after the device implantation, we analysed 284 auto-recorded episodes (103 undersensed and 181 correctly sensed). No oversensing episodes were recorded.
The recorded QRS amplitude in five different body positions: supine, left and right lateral, sitting and standing was measured. No statistically significant changes were observed in the different postures.
Even when patients were divided into subgroups according to implant site or the occurrence of undersensing episodes, no significant inter- or intra-group differences of the sensed electrogram were observed.
CONCLUSION: Undoubtedly this device is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of unexplained syncope. In the population we studied though, the device faced undersensing problems. Consequently, the device should be equipped with more advanced software for QRS morphology recognition, to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the recorder.
Key Words: Insertable loop recorder, unexplained syncope, sensitivity, undersensing
Correspondence: Prof. P. E. Vardas, MD, PhD (London), FESC, FACC, Cardiology Department, Heraklion University Hospital, P.O. Box 1352 Stavrakia, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. Tel.: +30 2810 392.706; Fax: +30 2810 542.055; E-mail: cardio{at}med.uoc.gr
[1] Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Yee R, Norris C. Maturation of the sensed electrogram amplitude over time in a new subcutaneous implantable loop recorder. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997; 20: 1686–1690.[CrossRef][Medline]
[2] Krahn A, Klein CJ, Yee R, et al. Use of an expended monitoring strategy in patients with problematic syncope. Circulation 1999; 99: 406–409.
[3] Krahn A, Klein CJ, Yee R, et al. The etiology of syncope in patients with negative non-invasive and invasive testing: Final results from a pilot study with an implantable loop recorder. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 117–119.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[4] Seidl K, Rameken M, Breunung S, et al. Diagnostic assessment of recurrent unexplained syncope with a new subcutaneously implantable loop recorder. Reveal Investigators. Europace 2000; 2: 256–262.
[5] Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Yee R, Manda V. The high cost of syncope: cost implications of a new insertable loop recorder in the investigation of recurrent syncope. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 870–877.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[6] Zellerhoff C, Himmrich E, Nebeling D, Przibille O, Nowak B, Liebrich A. How can we identify the best implantation site for an ECG event recorder? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 1545–1549.[Medline]
[7] Chrysostomakis SI, Simantirakis EN, Marketou ME, Vardas PE. Implantable loop recorder undersensing mimicking complete heart block. Europace 2002; 4: 211–213.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Bartoletti Implantable loop recorders for assessment of syncope: is 'Saint Thomas approach' still the best diagnostic strategy? Europace, October 1, 2009; 11(10): 1262 - 1264. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Force members, M. Brignole, P. Vardas, E. Hoffman, H. Huikuri, A. Moya, R. Ricci, N. Sulke, W. Wieling, EHRA Scientific Documents Committee, et al. Indications for the use of diagnostic implantable and external ECG loop recorders Europace, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 671 - 687. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T Pezawas, G Stix, J Kastner, B Schneider, M Wolzt, and H Schmidinger Implantable loop recorder in unexplained syncope: classification, mechanism, transient loss of consciousness and role of major depressive disorder in patients with and without structural heart disease Heart, April 1, 2008; 94(4): e17 - e17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. van Dam and A. van Oosterom Analysing the potential of Reveal(R) for monitoring cardiac potentials Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(suppl_6): vi119 - vi123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Lombardi, E. Calosso, G. Mascioli, E. Marangoni, A. Donato, S. Rossi, M. Pala, F. Foti, and M. Lunati Utility of implantable loop recorder (Reveal PlusŪ) in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(1): 19 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||