Skip Navigation

Europace 2002 4(4):357-360; doi:10.1053/eupc.2002.0265
© 2002 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donateo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Croci, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donateo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Croci, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A standardized conventional evaluation of the mechanism of syncope in patients with bundle branch block

P. Donateo1, M. Brignole1, P. Alboni2, C. Menozzi3, A. Raviele4, A. Del Rosso5, M. Dinelli2, A. Solano1, N. Bottoni3 and F. Croci1

1Department of Cardiology, Ospedali Riuniti Lavagna, Italy; 2Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile Cento, Italy; 3Department of Cardiology, Ospedale S Maria Nuova Reggio Emilia, Italy; 4Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Umberto I Mestre, Italy; 5Department of Cardiology, Ospedale S Pietro Igneo Fucecchio, Italy

BACKGROUND: The finding of bundle branch block in patients with syncope suggests that paroxysmal AV block may be the cause of syncope, even though its prevalence is unknown.

METHODS: We evaluated 55 consecutive patients with syncope and bundle branch block (mean age 75±8 years; median of two syncopal episodes per patient) referred to three Syncope Units. The hierarchy and appropriateness of diagnostic tests and the definitions of the final diagnoses followed standardized predefined criteria.

RESULTS: Cardiac syncope was diagnosed in 25 patients (45%): AV block in 20, sick sinus syndrome in 2, sustained ventricular tachycardia in 1, aortic stenosis in 2. Neurally mediated syncope was diagnosed in 22 (40%): carotid sinus syndrome in 5, tilt-induced syncope in 15, adenosine-sensitive syncope in 2. Syncope remained unexplained in 8 (15%).

CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of the patients with bundle branch block have a final diagnosis of cardiac syncope; in these patients, paroxysmal AV block is the most frequent but not the only mechanism supposed.

Key Words: Syncope, bundle branch block, structural heart disease, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, carotid sinus syndrome, cardiac conduction tissue disease


Correspondence: Paolo Donateo, MD, Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmologic Centre, Hospital of Lavagna, Italy. Via D. Bobbio. Tel.: +39 0185 329569. Fax: +39 0185 306506. E-mail: aritmo{at}asl4.liguria.it


[1] Cheitlin M, Conill A, Epstein AE, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 1175–1209.[Free Full Text]

[2] McAnulty JH, Rahimtoola SH, Murphy ES, et al. Natural history of "high-risk" bundle branch block. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 137–143.[Abstract]

[3] Scheinman MM, Peters RW, Sauve MJ, et al. Value of the H-Q interval in patients with bundle branch block and the role of prophylactic permanent pacing. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50: 1316–1322.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[4] Click R, Gersh B, Sugrue D, et al. Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 817–823.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[5] Morady F, Higgins J, Peters R, et al. Electrophysiologic testing in bundle branch block and unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 587–591.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[6] Bergfeldt L, Edvardsson N, Rosenqvist M, et al. Atrioventricular block progression in patients with bifascicular block assessed by repeated electrocardiography and a bradycardia-detecting pacemaker. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 1129–1132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[7] Gronda M, Magnani A, Occhetta E, et al. Electrophysiologic study of atrioventricular block and ventricular conduction defects. G Ital Cardiol 1984; 14: 768–773.[Medline]

[8] Dini P, Ialongo D, Adinolfi E, et al. Prognostic value of His-ventricular conduction after ajmaline administration. In Masoni A and Alboni P (Eds.). Cardiac Electrophysiology Today 1982; London Academic Press pp. 515–522.

[9] Kaul U, Dev V, Narula J, et al. Evaluation of patients with bundle branch block and "unexplained" syncope: a study based on comprehensive electrophysiologic testing and ajmaline stress. Pacing Cun Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 289–297.

[10] Twidale N, Heddle W, Tonkin A. Procainamide administration during electrophysiologic study. Utility as a provocative test for intermittent atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 1388–1397.[Medline]

[11] Alboni P, Brignole M, Menozzi C, et al. The diagnostic value of history in patients with syncope with or without heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1921–1928.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[12] Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG, et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 1256–1306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[13] Sutton R, Petersen M, Brignole M, Raviete A, Menozzi C, Gianni P. Proposed classification for tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1992; 2: 180–183.

[14] Martin GJ, Adams SL, Martin HG, et al. Prospective evaluation of syncope. Ann Emerg Med 1984; 13: 499–504.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[15] Oh JH, Hanusa BH, Kapoor WN. Do symptoms predict cardiac arrhythmias and mortality in patients with syncope? Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 375–380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[16] Eagle KA, Black HR, Cook EF, et al. Evaluation of prognostic classifications for patients with syncope. Am J Med 1985; 79: 455–460.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[17] Day SC, Cook EF, Funkenstein H, Goldma L. Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness. Am J Med 1982; 73: 15–23.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[18] Kapoor W. Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope. Medicine 1990; 69: 169–175.

[19] Ben-Chetrit E, Flugeiman M, Eliakim M. Syncope: a retrospective study of 101 hospitalized patients. Isr J Med Sci Med 1985; 21: 950–953.

[20] Englund A, Fredrikson M, Rosenquist M. Head-up tilt test. A nonspecific method of evaluating patients with bifascicular block. Circulation 1997; 95: 951–954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[21] Sagristá-Sauleda J, Romero B, Permanyer-Miralda G, et al. Clinical usefulness of head-up tilt test in patients with syncope and intraventricular conduction defect. Europace 1999; 1: 63–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[22] Brignole M, Gigli G, Altomonte F, et al. The cardioinhibitory reflex evoked by carotid sinus stimulation in normal and in patients with cardiovascular disorders. G Ital Cardiol 1985; 15: 514–519.[Medline]

[23] Brown KA, Maloney JA, Smith HC, et al. Carotid sinus reflex in patients undergoing coronary angiography: relationship of degree and location of coronary artery disease to response to carotid sinus massage. Circulation 1980; 62: 697–703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[24] Calkins H, Shyr Y, Frumin H, et al. The value of the clinical history in the differentiation of syncope due to ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block and neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Med 1995; 98: 365–373.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

[25] Brignole M, Menozzi C, Moya A, et al. Mechanism of syncope in patients with bundle branch block and negative electrophysiologic test. Circulation 2001; 104: 2045–2050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Bartoletti, P. Fabiani, L. Bagnoli, C. Cappelletti, M. Cappellini, G. Nappini, R. Gianni, A. Lavacchi, and G. M. Santoro
Physical injuries caused by a transient loss of consciousness: main clinical characteristics of patients and diagnostic contribution of carotid sinus massage
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2008; 29(5): 618 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donateo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Croci, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donateo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Croci, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?