© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction
Cardiology CHU of Brabois, 54500, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
The prognosis of patients with bundle branch block (BBB) and myocardial infarction (MI) is poor, particularly for patients suffering from syncope. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of some techniques for the evaluation of the mechanism of syncope in patients with MI and BBB and their prognosis.
METHODS: We prospectively obtained the results of clinical history, 24 h Holter monitoring, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) and programmed ventricular stimulation in 130 patients with syncope, MI and BBB. 81 of them had right (R)BBB and 49 left (L)BBB.
RESULTS: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was identified as the main cause of syncope in patients with MI and BBB: 68% of them had inducible VT. The sensitivity (se) and specificity (sp) of non sustained VT on Holter monitoring for the detection of VT were respectively 42·5 and 47% in patients with RBBB, 62 and 36% in those with LBBB; se and sp of LVEF <40% were 67·5% and 65% in patients with RBBB, 85 and 9% in those with LBBB; se and sp of the combination of 2 of the 3 SAECG criteria, QRS duration >155 ms, LAS duration >30 ms and RMS 40 <17 µV were respectively 50 and 57% in patients with RBBB; se and sp of the combination of 2 of the 3 criteria QRS duration >165 ms, LAS duration >40 ms and RMS 40 <17 µV were 73 and 55·5% in patients with LBBB. During the follow-up (4·7 years±2·5), 12 patients died suddenly and 12 patients died from heart failure. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed than only the induction of VT was a significant predictor of sudden death. A long QRS duration (>165 ms) and induction of VT were independent predictors of total cardiac mortality.
CONCLUSION: Among noninvasive studies, only the determination of filtered QRS duration was a significant predictor of cardiac mortality in the case of a prolongation (>165 ms). Sudden death was only predicted by the induction of sustained VT. Because of the high incidence of inducible sustained VT, the low value of Holter monitoring and decreased LVEF for the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias and the poor prognosis of patients with inducible VT and low LVEF, systematic programmed ventricular stimulation is indicated in patients with MI, syncope and BBB, whatever the non-invasive studies results.
Key Words: Bundle branch block, myocardial infarction, syncope, ventricular tachycardia
Correspondence: Béatrice Brembilla-Perrot, Cardiologie A, CHU of Brabois, Rue du Morvan, 54500 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
[1] Lie KI, Wellens HJJ, Shuilenburg RM, Becker AE, Durrer D. Factors influencing prognosis of bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal infarction. Circulation 1974; 50: 935–941.
[2] Sheinman M and Brenman B. Clinical and anatomic implication of intraventricular conduction block in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1972; 46: 753–760.
[3] Nimetz AA, Shubrooks SJ, Hutter AM, De Sanctis RW. The significance of bundle branch block during acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1975; 90: 439–444.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[4] Ricou F, Nicod P, Gilpin E, Henning H, Ross J. Influence of right bundle branch block on short- and long-term survival after acute anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 858–863.[Abstract]
[5] Melgarejo-Moreno A, Galcera-Tomas J, Garcia-Alberola A, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic significance of right bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction. A study in the thrombolytic era. Circulation 1997; 96: 1139–1144.
[6] Sgarbossa EB, Pinski S, Topol EJ, et al. Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 105–110.
[7] Zehender M, Buchner C, Meinertz T, Just H. Prevalence, circumstances, mechanisms and risk. Stratification of sudden cardiac death in unipolar single-chamber ventricular pacing. Circulation 1992; 85: 596–605.
[8] Ginks WR, Sutton R, Leatham A, Oh W. Long-term prognosis after acute anterior infarction with atrioventricular block. Br Heart J 1977; 39: 1986–1989.
[9] Freedman RA, Swerdlow CD, Soderhom-Difatte V, Mason JV. Clinical predictors of arrhythmias inducibility in survivors of cardiac arrest: importance of gender and prior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 973–978.[Abstract]
[10] Hess DS, Morady F, Scheinman MM. Electrophysiologic testing in the evaluation of patients with syncope of undetermined origin. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50: 1309–1315.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[11] Doherty JN, Pembrook-Roogers D, Grogan EW, et al. Electrophysiologic evaluation and follow-up characteristics in patients with recurrent unexplained syncope and presyncope. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 703–708.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[12] Simson MB. Use of signals in the terminal QRS complex to identify patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1981; 62: 235–242.
[13] Denes P, Santerelli P, Hauser RG, Uretz EF. Quantitative analysis of the high-frequency components of the terminal portion of the body surface QRS in normal subjects and in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1983; 67: 1129–1138.
[14] Breithardt G, Cain ME, El Sherif N, et al. Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 999–1006.[Abstract]
[15] Breithardt G and Borggrefe M. Recent advances in the identification of patients at risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias: role of ventricular late potentials. Circulation 1987; 85: 1091–1096.
[16] Gomes JA, Winters SL, Stewart D, Horowitz S, Milner M, Barreca P. A new non-invasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 349–357.[Abstract]
[17] Cripps T, Bennett D, Camm J, Ward D. Prospective evaluation of clinical assessment of exercise testing and signal-averaged electrocardiogram in predicting outcome after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 995–999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[18] Zimmerman M, Adamec R, Simonin P. Prognostic significance of ventricular late potentials in coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 1985; 109: 725–732.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[19] Gomes JA, Winters SL, Martinson M, Machac J, Stewart D, Targonski A. The prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction and ventricular premature beats: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 377–384.[Abstract]
[20] Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, Sammel NL. Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 531–538.[Abstract]
[21] Sherlag BJ, Gunn CG, Berbari EJ, Lazzara R. Peri-infarction block (1950). Late potentials (1980): their relationship, significance and diagnostic implication. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 839–841.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[22] Flowers NC, Horan LG, Wylds AC, et al. Relation of peri-infarction block to ventricular late potentials in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 568–574.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[23] Buckingham TA, Tessen CC, Stevens LL, Redd RM, Kennedy HL. Effect of conduction defects on the signal-averaged electrocardiographic determination of late potentials. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 1265–1271.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[24] Fontaine JM, Rao R, Henkin R, Suneja R, Urssell SN, El Sherif N. Study of the influence of left bundle branch block on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 494–508.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[25] Englund A, Rosenqvist M, Bergfeldt L. Use of signal-averaged electrocardiography for predicting inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with bundle branch block with and without a history of syncope. Am Heart J 1995; 130: 481–488.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[26] Gatzoulis KA, Carlson D, Biblo LA, Gialafos J, Toutouzas P, Waldo AL. Time domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with a conduction defect or a bundle branch block. Eur Heart J 1995; 16: 1912–1919.
[27] Brembilla-Perrot B, Terrier de la Chaise A, Beurrier D. Signal-averaged electrocardiogram after myocardial infarction correlation with the type of arrhythmias induced during electrophysiologic study. J of Ambulatory Monitoring 1993; 6: 209–217.
[28] Gulamhuseim S, Nacarelli GV, Ko PT, et al. Value and limitations of clinical electrophysiologic study in assessment of patients with unexplained syncope. Am J Med 1982; 73: 7005–7009.
[29] Sharma AD, Klein GJ, Milstein S. Diagnostic assessment of reccurrent syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1984; 7: 749–759.[CrossRef][Medline]
[30] Dimarco JP, Garan H, Harthorne JW, Ruskin JN. Intracardiac electrophysiologic techniques in recurrent syncope of unknown cause. Ann Intern Med 1981; 95: 542–548.
[31] Teichman SL, Felder SD, Matos JA, Kim SG, Waspe LE, Fisher JD. The value of electrophysiologic studies in syncope of undetermined origin: report of 150 cases. Am Heart J 1985; 110: 469–479.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[32] Olshansky B, Mazuz M, Martins JB. Significance of inducible tachycardia in patients with syncope of undetermined origin: a long-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 216–223.[Abstract]
[33] Kapoor W, Hammill SC, Gersch BJ. Diagnostic and natural history of syncope and the role of invasive electrophysiologic testing. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 730P–734P.
[34] Bass EB, Elson JJ, Fogoros RN, Peterson J, Arena VC, Kapoor WN. Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies for syncope of unknown origin. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 1186–1191.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[35] Brembilla-Perrot B, Terrier De La Chaise A, Suty-Selton C, Thiel B, Louis P, Brua JL. La stimulation ventriculaire programmée dans les syncopes inexpliquées. Facteurs de risque de déclenchement d'une tachycardie ventriculaire. Arch Mal Coeur 1991; 84: 1425–1430.
[36] Brembilla-Perrot B, Beurrier D, Terrier de la Chaise A, et al. Significance and prevalence of inducible atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients undergoing electrophysiologic study for presyncope or syncope. Int J Cardiol 1996; 53: 61–69.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[37] Brembilla-Perrot B, Donetti J, Terrier de la Chaise A, Sadoul N, Aliot E, Juillière Y. Diagnostic value of ventricular stimulation in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 1124–1131.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[38] Brembilla-Perrot B, Terrier de la Chaise A, Briançon S, et al. Programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: long-term follow-up. Int J Cardiol 1995; 49: 55–65.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[39] McClements BM and Adgey J. Value of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, Holter monitoring and clinical variables for prediction of arrhythmic events in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 1419–1427.[Abstract]
[40] Steinberg JS, Prystowsky E, Freedman RA, et al. Use of signal-averaged electrocardiogram for predicting inducible ventricular tachycardia in patients with unexplained syncope: relation to clinical variables in a multivariate analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 99–106.[Abstract]
[41] Brembilla-Perrot B, Terrier de la Chaise A, Jacquemin L, Beurrier D, Houplon P. The signal-averaged electrocardiogram is of limited value in patients with bundle branch block and dilated cadiomyopathy in predicting inducible ventricular tachycardia or death. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 154–159.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[42] Olshansky B, Hahn EA, Hartz VL, Prater SP, Mason JW. ESVEM investigators, Clinical significance of syncope in the Electrophysilogic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 878–86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[43] Raviele A, Proclemer A, Gasparini G, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with unexplained syncope and negative electrophysiologic study. Eur Heart J 1989; 10: 127–132.
[44] Morady F and Higgins J, et al. Electrophysiologic testing in bundle branch block and unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 587–591.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[45] Sheldon R, Rose S, Koshman ML. Isoproterenol tilt-table testing in patients with syncope and structural heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 700–702.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[46] Julian DG, Camm AJ, Frangin G, Janse MJ, Munoz A, Schwartz PJ, Simon P. Randomised trial of effect of amiodarone on mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after recent myocardial infarction: EMIAT. Lancet 1997; 349: 667–674.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[47] Anderson JL and Prystowsky EN. Sotalol: an important new antiarrhythmic. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 388–409.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||