Skip Navigation

Europace 2001 3(2):96-99; doi:10.1053/eupc.2001.0156
© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ricard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bardy, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ricard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bardy, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


REGULAR ARTICLES

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks

P. Ricard1, S. Lévy1, G. Boccara1, E. Lakhal1 and G. Bardy2

1University of Marseille France; 2University of Seattle WA, U.S.A

AIMS: It is well established in transthoracic ventricular defibrillation that biphasic truncated waveform shocks are associated with superior defibrillation efficacy when compared with damped sine wave monophasic waveform shocks. The aim of this study was to explore whether biphasic waveform shocks were superior to monophasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in whom cardioversion of AF was indicated were randomized in this prospective study, to transthoracic cardioversion with either monophasic damped sine waveform shocks or biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks. In the group randomized to monophasic waveform shocks (27 patients), a first shock of 150 J was delivered, followed (if necessary) by a 360 J shock. In the biphasic waveform group (30 patients), the first shock had an energy of 150 J and (if necessary) a second 150 J was delivered. All shocks were delivered in the anterolateral chest pad position.

Sinus rhythm was restored in 16 patients (51%) with the first monophasic shock and in 27 patients (86%) with the first biphasic shock. The difference was statistically significant (P=0·02). After the second shock, sinus rhythm was obtained in a total of 24 patients (88%) with monophasic shocks and in 28 patients (93%) with biphasic shocks. No complication was observed in either group and cardiac enzymes (CK, CKmb, troponin I, myoglobin) did not show any significant changes.

CONCLUSION: This study suggests that at the same energy level of 150 J, biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks are superior to monophasic damped sine waveform shocks cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, external cardioversion monophasic shocks, biphasic shocks


Correspondence: Professor Samuel Lévy, MD, Division of Cardiology, Hôpital Nord, 13015 Marseille, France. slevy{at}ap-hm.fr Presented in part at the European Congress of Cardiology, Barcelona, Spain, 1 September 1999.


[1] Lown B. Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias. Br Heart J 1967; 29: 469–489.

[2] Crijns HJ, Van Gelder IC, Van Gilst WH, Hillege H, Gosselink AM, Lie KI. Serial antiarrhythmic drug treatment to maintain sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 335–341.

[3] Lévy S, Lauribe P, Dolla E. A randomized comparison of external and internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1992; 86: 1415–1420.

[4] Lévy S, Ricard Ph, Lau CP, et al. Multicentre low energy transvenous atrial defibrillation (XAD) trial results in differents subsets of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 750–755.

[5] Schmitt C, Alt E, Plewan E, et al. Low-energy intracardiac cardioversion after failed conventional external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 994–999.

[6] Taramasco V, Socas A, Ricard P, Lévy S. Internal low-energy cardioversion: A therapeutic option for restoring sinus rhythm in chronic atrial fibrillation after failure of external cardioversion. Europace 1999; 1: 179–182.

[7] Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, et al. A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic vs monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 728–733.

[8] Bardy GH, Gliner BE, Kudenckuck PJ, et al. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation. Circulation 1995; 91: 1768–1774.

[9] Bardy GH, Marchlinski FE, Sharma AD, et al. Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Circulation 1996; 94: 2507–2514.

[10] Cooper RAS, Alferness CA, Smith WM, et al. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep. Circulation 1993; 87: 1673–1686.

[11] Lévy S. Classification system of atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol 2000; 15: 54–57.

[12] Lévy S, Breithardt G, Campbell RWF, et al. On behalf of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Atrial fibrillation: Current knowledge and recommendations for management strategy. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1294–1320.

[13] Mittal S, Ayati S, Schartzman D, et al. Comparison of a rectilinear biphasic waveform with a standard monophasic waveform for the cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrohysiol 1999; 22: 739.

[14] Jones JL and Jones RE. Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms. Am J Physiol 1984; 247: H792–H796.

[15] Oral H, Souza JJ, Michaud GF, et al. Facilitating transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with ibutilide pretreatment. New Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1849–1854.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular MedicineHome page
A. J. Camm, P. Kirchhof, G. Y.H. Lip, I. Savelieva, and S. Ernst
CHAPTER 29 Atrial Fibrillation
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
V. S. Kawabata, C. B. Vianna, M. A. Moretti, M. M. Gonzalez, J. F. Ferreira, S. Timerman, and L. A. Cesar
Monophasic versus biphasic waveform shocks for atrial fibrillation cardioversion in patients with concomitant amiodarone therapy
Europace, February 1, 2007; 9(2): 143 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
T. Van Noord, R. G. Tieleman, H. A. Bosker, T. Kingma, D. J. Van Veldhuisen, H. J.G.M Crijns, and I. C. Van Gelder
Beta-blockers prevent subacute recurrences of persistent atrial fibrillation only in patients with hypertension
Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(4): 343 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M Scholten, T Szili-Torok, P Klootwijk, and L Jordaens
Comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): 1032 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
Ph. Ricard, K. Yaici, J.P. Rinaldi, M. Bergonzi, and N. Saoudi
Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: how and when?
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2003; 5(suppl_H): H40 - H44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. L. Page, R. E. Kerber, J. K. Russell, T. Trouton, J. Waktare, D. Gallik, J. E. Olgin, P. Ricard, G. W. Dalzell, R. Reddy, et al.
Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: The results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1956 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ricard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bardy, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ricard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bardy, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?