© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
Permanent pacemaker implantation via the femoral vein: an alternative in cases with contraindications to the pectoral approach
Department of Invasive Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Royal Brompton Hospital London, UK
BACKGROUND: This paper presents a consecutive series of permanent pacemakers (PPM) implanted via the femoral vein in patients with contraindications to pacing systems via the superior vena cava (SVC). The femoral vein approach is a less invasive and feasible alternative to epicardial lead placement.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients had femoral pacemakers inserted. Indications for femoral vein pacemaker insertion were: SVC/subclavian obstruction (12 patients, 44·4%), previous infection in SVC leads (four patients, 14·8%), mastectomy and/or radiotherapy to chest (four patients, 14·8%), multiple leads in SVC (two patients, 7·4%), recurrent erosion (two patients, 7·4%), abnormal anatomy (one patient, 3·7%), painful pacemaker pocket (one patient, 3·7%) and burns (one patient, 3·7%). Fifty-one leads, 25 atrial and 26 ventricular, were inserted. The majority of leads were active fixations (96% of atrial leads and 85% ventricular leads).
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 36·5 months (range 0·9–116·5), six additional unplanned procedures were performed in four patients. Atrial lead displacement occurred in five leads (20%). There were no ventricular lead displacements. In two patients, box revision for pre-erosion was required. One patient had persistent pain at the site of abdominal pacemaker generator. Infection, thromboembolic events, thromophlebitis, evidence of lower limb venous occlusion and lead fracture did not occur.
CONCLUSION: Femoral vein PPM are a simple and feasible alternative in patients in whom the SVC approach is contraindicated.
Key Words: Permanent pacemaker, implantation, femoral approach
Correspondence: Richard Sutton, Department of Invasive Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK. E-mail: rhawthorn{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
[1] Ellestad MH, Caso R, Greenberg PS. Permanent pacemaker implantation using the femoral vein: a preliminary report. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1980; 3: 418–422.[Medline]
[2] Sutton R and Vardas P. Special surgical techniques in pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1987; 10: 749 (Abstract).
[3] Stoney WS, Addlestone RB, Alford WC, Burrus GR, Frist RA, Thomas CS. The incidence of venous thrombosis following long-term cardiac pacing. Ann Thorac Surg 1976; 22: 166–170.[Abstract]
[4] Weinstein J, Gnoj J, Mazzara JT, Ayres SM, Grace WJ. Temporary transvenous pacing via the percutaneous femoral vein approach. Am Heart J 1973; 85: 695.[Medline]
[5] Cohen SI, Smith LK, Aroesty JM. Transfemoral cardiac pacing and phlebitis. Circulation 1974; 49: 1018.
[6] Kiviniemi MS, Pirnes MA, Eranen HJK, et al. Complications related to permanent pacemaker therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 711–720.[CrossRef][Medline]
[7] Ellestad MH and French J. Iliac vein approach to permanent pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989; 12: 1030–1033.[Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. M. Spotnitz Surgical Implantation of Pacemakers and Automatic Defibrillators Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1395 - 1428. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Yousef, V. Paul, and F. Leyva Cardiac resynchronization via the femoral vein: a novel method in cases with contraindications to the pectoral approach. Europace, February 1, 2006; 8(2): 144 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M. Spotnitz Pacemakers and Automatic Defibrillators Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1293 - 1326. [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||