© 2001 by European Society of Cardiology
SELECTED ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Safety and efficacy of low-energy cardioversion of 500 patients using two different techniques
Medical PATH Milan, Italy
AIM: To present some safety and efficacy issues of low-energy internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation from 500 consecutive procedures performed with two different techniques, using either two single-coil catheters, or a single twin-coil catheter.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Low-energy internal cardioversion was carried out in 368 patients by means of two defibrillation catheters: the former was positioned in the right atrium and the latter either in the left pulmonary artery (212 patients), or in the distal coronary sinus (156 patients). In the remaining 132 patients, a single twin-coil catheter was positioned with the distal coil either in the pulmonary artery (75 patients) or in the coronary sinus (57 patients), while the proximal coil was in the right atrium. The external defibrillator delivered truncated biphasic shocks (6/6 ms, tilt 50%), with a voltage of 10–400 V. In 283 patients (57%) external cardioversion had been unsuccessfully tried before low-energy internal cardioversion. After a total of 1118 shocks, the overall success rate was 92·2% (91·3% with two catheters and 94·7% with the single catheter); the success rate was 93·4 and 91·3% with the coronary sinus and the pulmonary artery approach, respectively. The mean energy used was 6·5±3·4 J (voltage: 320±45 V); no difference was found between the twin catheter (6·3±3·1 J) and the single catheter approach (6·9±3·7 J), while the coronary sinus configuration required a significantly lower energy than the pulmonary artery configuration (5·6±2·9 vs 7·2±3·8 J, P<0·05). The duration of the current atrial fibrillation episode was the only clinical characteristic statistically different between the 461 successfully cardioverted patients and the 39 failures (295 vs 727 days, P<0·01). No complication was recorded during or after the delivery of the therapy; no procedure had to be terminated because of patient's intolerance.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-energy internal cardioversion is a safe and effective procedure for converting chronic atrial fibrillation, confirmed by this large multicentre experience. The newly available twin-coil catheter seems to achieve a slightly better success rate compared with the traditional two-catheter technique, and is associated with the same safety profile.
Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, internal cardioversion
Correspondence: Medical PATH, Via IV Novembre, 42, 20080 Besate, Milan, Italy. E-mail: info{at}medicalpath.com
[1] Bialy D, Lehmann MH, Schumacher DN, et al. Hospitalization for arrhythmias in the United States: importance of atrial fibrillation (Abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 41A.
[2] N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 863–868.[Abstract]
[3] Grogan M and Smith HC. Left ventricular dysfunction due to atrial fibrillation in patients initially believed to have idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1570–1573.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[4] Alam M and Thorstrand C. Left ventricular function in patients with atrial fibrillation before and after cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 694–696.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[5] Faber TS, Zehender M, van de Loo A, Hohnloser S, Just H. Torsade de pointes complicating drug treatment of low-malignant forms of arrhythmia: four case reports. Clin Cardiol 1994; 17: 197–202.[Web of Science][Medline]
[6] Lévy S, Lauribe P, Dolla E, et al. A randomized comparison of external and internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1992; 86: 1415–1420.
[7] Alt E, Ammer R, Schmitt C, et al. A comparison of treatment of atrial fibrillation with low-energy intracardiac cardioversion and conventional external cardioversion. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1796–1804.
[8] Van Gelder I and Crijns HJGM. Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 20: 2675–2683.
[9] Alt E, Schmitt C, Ammer R, et al. Initial experience with intracardiac atrial defibrillation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994; 17: 1067–1078.[CrossRef][Medline]
[10] Murgatroyd FD, Slade AKB, Sopher M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of transvenous low energy cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1347–1353.[Abstract]
[11] Baker BM, Botteron GW, Smith JM. Low-energy internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation resistant to external cardioversion. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1995; 6: 44–47.[Web of Science][Medline]
[12] Schmitt C, Alt E, Plewan A, et al. Low energy intracardiac cardioversion after failed conventional external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 994–999.[Abstract]
[13] Sopher SM, Murgatroyd FD, Slade AKB, et al. Low energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation resistant to transthoracic shocks. Heart 1996; 75: 635–638.
[14] Ammer R, Alt E, Ayers G, et al. Pain threshold for low energy intracardiac cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with low or no sedation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997; 20: 230–236.[CrossRef][Medline]
[15] Santini M, Pandozi C, Toscano S, et al. Low energy intracardiac cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 2641–2650.[CrossRef][Medline]
[16] Boriani G, Biffi M, Bronzetti G, et al. Efficacy and tolerability in fully conscious patients of transvenous low energy internal atrial cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 241–244.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[17] Plewan A, Valina C, Herrmann R, Alt E. Initial experience with a new balloon-guided single lead catheter for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and dual chamber pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 228–232.[CrossRef][Medline]
[18] Taramasco V, Socas A, Ricard P, Lévy S. Internal low-energy cardioversion: A therapeutic option for restoring sinus rhythm in chronic atrial fibrillation after failure of external cardioversion. Europace 1999; 1: 179–182.
[19] Boriani G, Biffi M, Pergolini F, et al. Low energy internal atrial cardioversion in atrial fibrillation lasting more than a year. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 243–246.[CrossRef][Medline]
[20] Laupacis A, Albers G, Dunn M, Feinberg W. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Third ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy. Chest 1992; 102: 426S–433S.
[21] Barold HS, Shander G, Tomassoni G, et al. Effect of increased parasympathetic and sympathetic tone on internal atrial defibrillation thresholds in humans. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 238–242.[CrossRef][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D Pavin, H Legrand, C Leclercq, C Crocq, P Mabo, and J C Daubert Transvenous low energy internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation refractory to external cardioversion: do non-obese patients benefit? Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 332 - 333. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S K S Lairikyengbam, M H Anderson, and A G Davies Present treatment options for atrial fibrillation Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2003; 79(928): 67 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Levy Internal cardioversion. Is it needed? How best to perform it? Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(2): 87 - 89. [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||