© 2000 by European Society of Cardiology
Does the mechanism of action of biatrial pacing for atrial fibrillation involve changes in cardiac haemodynamics?
Assessment by Doppler echocardiography and natriuretic peptide measurements
1Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Harefield Hospital Harefield, Middlesex, U.K.; 2Heart Sciences Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Harefield Hospital Harefield, Middlesex, U.K.; 3Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, St George's Cardiovascular Group, St George's Hospital Medical School London, U.K.
AIMS: The antifibrillatory mechanism of biatrial (BI) pacing has not been fully elucidated. We investigated the role of a haemodynamic mechanism in eight patients implanted with a BI pacemaker (Chorus RM) by comparing changes in mitral Doppler flow and atrial and B-type natriuretic peptide levels (ANP, BNP) with BI pacing compared with sinus rhythm and right atrial (RA) pacing.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Measurements were taken after 60 min in the supine position in each of two pairs of randomized pacing modes: (a) AAI 40 beats.min–1, (allows sinus rhythm mean rate 56 beats.min–1, SR) vs AAI 40 beats.min–1with synchronized left atrial pacing (SRSync); (b) overdrive AAI RA pacing (89 beats.min–1(n=6) or 70 beats.min–1(n=2)) vs overdrive AAI BI pacing. Within each pair there was significant earlier activation of the left atrial Doppler signal in relation to the surface ECG P wave with BI pacing (SR 163±10 ms vs SRSync 144±21 ms (P=0·02), and RA 232±14 ms vs BI 196±16 ms (P=0·001)), and significant shortening of the P-R interval (SR 163±29 ms vs SRSync 148±20 (P=0·007) and RA 261±27 ms vs BI 232±23 (P=0·001)). The net observed effect was of no change in the atrioventricular timing sequence (delay of peak E or A to QRS/mitral valve closure) and no change in other Doppler echo parameters. Levels of the cardiac peptides ANP and BNP were raised compared with healthy controls, but did not significantly change during the study.
CONCLUSION: Acute BI pacing shortens the P-R interval and causes earlier left atrial contraction in relation to the surface electrocardiogram P wave. It does not alter the atrioventricular timing cycle, any other Doppler measurements or change cardiac peptide levels. This suggests that BI pacing does not cause haemodynamic changes that could account for any antifibrillatory properties.
Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, biatrial pacing, Doppler, natriuretic peptides
Correspondence: Dr T. Levy MRCP, Registrar in Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, Middlesex UB9 6JH, U.K.
[1] Saksena S, Prakash A, Hill M. Prevention of atrial fibrillation with chronic dual site right atrial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 687–694.
[2] Daubert C, Berder V, Gras D, Leclercq C. Atrial tachyarrhythmias associated with high degree interatrial conduction block: Prevention by permanent atrial resynchronisation. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1994; 4: 35–44.
[3] Isobe F, Schuessler RB, Mitsuno M. High atrial pressure directly affects the dispersion of refractoriness and the inducibility of atrial fibrillation (Abstr). Circulation 1993; 88: 1–326.
[4] Solti F, Vecsey T, Kekesi V, Juhasz-Nagy A. The effects of atrial dilatation on the genesis of atrial arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Res 1989; 23: 882–886.
[5] Klein LS, Miles WM, Zipes DP. Effect of atrioventricular interval during pacing or reciprocating tachycardia on atrial size, pressure, and refractory period. Contraction–excitation feedback in human atrium. Circulation 1990; 82: 60–68.
[6] Cowie MR, Struthers AD, Wood DA. Value of natriuretic peptides in assessment of patients with possible new heart failure in primary care. Lancet 1997; 350: 1347–1351.
[7] Missouris CG, Grouzmann E, Buckley MG, Barron J, MacGregor GA, Singer DRJ. How does treatment influence endocrine mechanisms in acute severe heart failure? Effects on cardiac natriuretic peptides, the renin system, neuropeptide Y and catecholamines. Clin Sci 1998; 94: 591–596.
[8] Buckley MG, Sethi D, Markandu ND, Sagnella GA, Singer DRJ, MacGregor GA. Plasma concentrations and comparisons of brain natriuretic peptide and atrial natriuretic peptide in normal subjects, cardiac transplant recipients and patients with dialysis-independent or dialysis-dependant chronic renal failure. Clin Sci 1992; 83: 437–444.
[9] Moe GK. On the multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1962; 140: 183–188.
[10] Gilligan DM, Wood MA, Belz MK, Shepard RK, Clemo HS, Ellenbogen KA. Does biatrial pacing acutely alter refractoriness? Circulation 1996; 94: 3244.
[11] Prakash A, Saksena S, Hill M. Acute effects of dual-site right atrial pacing in patients with spontaneous and inducible atrial flutter and fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1007–1014.
[12] Yu W-C, Chen S-A, Tai C-T, Feng A-N, Chang M-S. Effects of different atrial pacing modes on atrial electrophysiology. Implicating the mechanism of biatrial pacing in the prevention of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1997; 96: 2992–2996.
[13] Sopher SM, Murgatroyd FD, Slade AKB, Ward DE, Rowland E, Camm AJ. Dual site atrial pacing promotes SR in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1995; 92: 2540.
[14] Papageorgiou P, Monahan K, Boyle NG. Site-dependent intra-atrial conduction delay. Relationship to initiation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1996; 94: 384–389.
[15] Papageorgiou P, Anselme F, Kirchhof CJHJ. Coronary sinus pacing prevents induction of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1997; 94: 1893–1898.
[16] Janosik DI, Pearson AC, Buckingham TA, Labovitz AJ, Reed RMJ. The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events during physiologic pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 499–507.
[17] Wish M, Fletcher RD, Gottdiener JS, Cohen AI. Importance of left atrial timing in the programming of dual-chamber pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 566–571.
[18] Daubert C, Gras D, Pavin D, Place CD, Baisset JM, Mabo P. Biatrial synchronous pacing to optimise the hemodynamic benefit of DDD pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Circulation 1995; 92: I–780.
[19] Daubert C, Berder V, Place CD, Mabo P, Leclercq C, Varin C. Hemodynamic benefits of permanent atrial resynchronization in patients with advanced interatrial blocks, paced in DDD mode (Abstr). PACE 1991; 14: 650.
[20] Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RI. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: New insights from a combined hemodynamic and doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 426–440.
[21] Thomas JD, Choong CYP, Flachskampf FA, Weyman AE. Analysis of the early transmitral doppler velocity curve: Effect of primary physiologic changes and compensatory preload adjustment. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 644–655.
[22] Cohen GI, Pietrolungo JF, Thomas JD, Klein AL. A practical guide to assessment of ventricular diastolic function using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1753–1760.
[23] Kangro T, Henriksen E, Jonason T, Nilsson H, Ringqvist I. Factors of importance to Doppler indices of left ventricular filling in 50-year old healthy subjects. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 612–618.
[24] Harrison MR, Clifton GD, Pennell AT, DeMaria AN. Effect of heart rate on left ventricular diastolic transmitral flow velocity patterns assessed by doppler echocardiography in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 622–627.
[25] Burnett JC Jr, Osborn MJ, Hammill SC, Heublein DM. The role of frequency of atrial contraction versus atrial pressure in atrial natriuretic peptide release. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989; 69: 881–884.
[26] Walsh KP, Williams TD, Spiteri C, Pitts E, Lightman SL, Sutton R. Role of atrial pressure and rate in release of atrial natriuretic peptide. Am J Physiol 1988; 254: R607–610.
[27] Surdacki A, Bednarek J, Radziszewski W. Plasma ANP and cyclic GMP levels versus left ventricular performance at different AV delays in AV sequential pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994; 17: 627–636.
[28] Vardas PE, Travill CM, Williams TDM, Ingram AM, Lightman SL, Sutton R. Effect of dual chamber pacing on raised plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations in complete atrioventricular block. Br Med J 1988; 296: 94–95.
[29] Noll B, Krappe J, Goke B, Maisch B. Influence of pacing mode and rate on peripheral levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989; 12: 1763–1768.
[30] Papadopoulos CL, Kokkas BA, Sakadamis GC. ANP concentrations during interchanging DDD-VVI pacing modes in patients with retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction. Acta Cardiol 1997; 52: 37–47.
[31] Peuhkurinen KJ, Huikuri HV, Ruskoaho H, Takkunen JT. Blood pressure, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and catecholamines during rapid ventricular pacing and effects of beta-adrenergic blockade in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 35–39.
[32] Lemke B, Gude J, von Dryander S, Barmeyer J, Braun BE, Krieg M. Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block. Z Kardiol 1990; 79: 547–556.
[33] Stangl K, Weil J, Seitz K, Laule M, Gerzer R. Influence of AV synchrony on the plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in patients with total AV block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 1176–1181.
[34] Baratto MT, Berti S, Clerico A, Fommei E, Del Chiccal MG, Contini C. Atrial natriuretic peptide during different pacing modes in a comparison with hemodynamic changes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990; 13: 432–442.
[35] Michelucci A, Padeletti L, Monopoli A. Effect of right atrial stimulation on both atrial pressure and atrial natriuretic peptide release in essential hypertension. Cardiology 1991; 78: 304–310.
[36] Tsai RC, Yamaji T, Ishibashi M. Atrial natriuretic peptide during supraventricular tachycardia and relation to hemodynamic changes and renal function. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 1260–1264.
[37] La Villa G, Padeletti L, Lazzeri C. Plasma levels of natriuretic peptides during ventricular pacing in patients with a dual chamber pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994; 17: 953–958.
[38] Rademaker MT, Charles CJ, Espiner EA, Frampton CM, Nicholls MG, Richards AM. Natriuretic peptide responses to acute and chronic ventricular pacing in sheep. Am J Physiol 1996; 270: H594–602.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Doi, M. Takagi, I. Toda, M. Yoshiyama, K. Takeuchi, and J. Yoshikawa Acute Hemodynamic Benefits of Bi-Atrial Atrioventricular Sequential Pacing With the Optimal Atrioventricular Delay J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 320 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A Doi, M Takagi, I Toda, M Yoshiyama, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Acute haemodynamic benefits of biatrial atrioventricular sequential pacing: comparison with single atrial atrioventricular sequential pacing Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 411 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||