© 2000 by European Society of Cardiology
Artifacts recorded through failing bipolar polyurethane insulated permanent pacing leads
Cardiology Unit and Department of Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel
Pacing failure in bipolar systems using polyurethane insulated leads may be frequent depending on the type of polyurethane and can cause oversensing and or failure to capture. The reason for this failure is often breakage in the inner insulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the signals created by such a short circuit. Thirty-seven patients were included in the study, 13 with failing leads with polyurethane 80A insulation, 14 with old but normally functioning leads and 10 patients with new leads. Artifacts in the form of spikes were recorded, during surgical revision, from 11 patients with failing leads (84·6%). In patients with normally functioning leads and newly implanted leads no artifacts were recorded. A significant decrease in impedance of 373·4 Ohms (99% confidence intervals 286·4–460·4,P <0·05) was noted in the failing leads compared with a decrease of only 113·0 Ohms (99% confidence intervals 6·5–219·6, P<0·01) in the control leads. The difference between the groups was highly significant. In 10 newly implanted and five normally functioning bipolar ventricular leads similar artifacts could be created by making intermittent contact between the proximal lead connections. Thus, artifacts could be recorded from failing leads and from intact leads with artificial intermittent connection at the proximal end. Our results suggest that the failure is caused by a short circuit in the lead. This finding may have important clinical applications in the follow-up of bipolar pacing and defibrillation leads.
Key Words: Polyurethane insulation, failing leads, lead follow-up, sensing signals, artifacts
Correspondence: Shimon Rosenheck, MD, Cardiology Unit, Hadassah University Hospital Mount Scopus, PO Box 24035, Jerusalem 91240, Israel.
[1] Stokes K. The biostability of polyurethane leads. In Barold SS (Ed.). Modern Cardiac Pacing 1985; Armonk, New York Futura Publishing Company pp. 173–198.
[2] Stokes KB and Church T. Ten-year experience with implanted polyurethane lead insulation. PACE 1986; 9: 11605.
[3] Fletcher R, McManus C, Keung E, Crews J. The Veterans Affairs lead registry (Abstr). PACE 1992; 15: 512.
[4] Hayes DL, Graham KJ, Irwin M. A multicenter experience with bipolar tined polyurethane ventricular lead. PACE 1992; 15: 1033–1039.
[5] Sweesy MW, Forney CC, Hayes DL. Evaluation of an in-line bipolar polyurethane ventricular pacing lead. PACE 1992; 15: 1982–1985.
[6] Woscoboinik JR, Maloney JD, Helguera HE. Pacing lead survival: performance of different models. PACE 1992; 15: 1991–1995.
[7] Hayes DL, Graham KJ, Irwin M. Multicenter experience with a bipolar tined polyurethane ventricular lead. PACE 1995; 18: 999–1004.
[8] Timmis GC, Gordon S, Westveer D. Polyurethane as a pacemaker lead insulator. In Steinbach K, Glogar D, Laszkovics A, Scheibbelhofer W, Weber H (Eds.). Cardiac Pacing 1983; Darmstadt, Germany Steinkopff Verlag pp. 303–10.
[9] Phillips R, Frey M, Martin RO. Long-term performance of polyurethane pacing leads: mechanisms of design-related failures. PACE 1986; 9: 1166–1172.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. Aliyev, C. Celiker, C. Turkoglu, and O. Abaci Unusual electrocardiographic presentation of pacemaker battery depletion with lead failure: pacing spike, artefact or native QRS? A short communication Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 888 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||