Europace

Europace 1999 1(3):187-191; doi:10.1053/eupc.1999.0037
© 1999 by European Society of Cardiology

This Article Abstract FREE Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to citation manager Request Permissions Disclaimer Google Scholar Articles by Holt, N.D. Articles by McComb, J.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holt, N.D. Articles by McComb, J.M. Social Bookmarking          What's this?

Electrophysiological properties of the recipient atrial remnant after human orthotopic cardiac transplantation

N.D. Holt, K. Hetherington, S. Brady, J.H. Dark and J.M. McComb

Regional Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.

AIMS: The recipient atrial remnant has been used as a control in studies of chronotropic response following orthotopic cardiac transplantation and as a trigger for the donor heart. It is not known, however, whether its function is normal. We investigated the electrophysiological properties of the recipient atrial remnant.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients were studied, mean age 49 years (range 20–63) and mean time post-orthotopic cardiac transplantation of 31 months (range 1–107). Recipient atrial rhythm, spontaneous cycle length and sinus node function were determined. Atrial fibrillation/flutter was identified in 10/50 (20%). Of those in sinus rhythm, significant bradycardia was present in 12/40 (30%). The mean spontaneous cycle length was 929 ± 188 ms. Three patients demonstrated variable atrial electrocardiogram morphology and a further three patients had marked variations in resting cycle length. The sinus node function was abnormal in 2/34 (6%).

CONCLUSIONS: Only 56% recipient atria had normal sinus rhythm, with 21% of these demonstrating features consistent with a wandering atrial pacemaker. The recipient atrial remnant is not normal in the majority of transplant recipients and should be used with caution in studies involving its use as a control or as a trigger for the donor heart.

Key Words: Cardiac transplantation, electrophysiology, recipient atrium, permanent pacemakers

---

Correspondence: Dr N. D. Holt, c/o Dr McComb's Secretary, Regional Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, U. K.

---

[1] Lower RR, Stofer RC, Shumway NE. Homovital transplantation of the heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961; 41: 196–202.[Web of Science][Medline]

[2] Moberg A. Anastomoses between extracardiac vessels and coronary arteries. I. Via bronchial arteries. Post-mortem angiographic study in adults and new-born infants. Acta Radiol (Diagn) 1967; 6: 177–192.

[3] Scherrer U, Vissing SF, Morgan BJ. Cyclosporine-induced sympathetic activation and hypertension after heart transplantation. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 693–699.[Abstract]

[4] Arrowood JA, Mohanty PK, Hodgson JM, Dibner-Dunlap ME, Thames MD. Ventricular sensory endings mediate reflex bradycardia during coronary arteriography in humans. Circulation 1989; 80: 1293–1300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[5] Arrowood JA, Goudreau E, Minisi AJ, Davis AB, Mohanty PK. Evidence against reinnervation of cardiac vagal afferents after human orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1995; 92: 402–408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[6] Osterholtzer G, Markewitz A, Anthumber M, Kemkes BM. An example of how to pace a patient with a heart transplantation. J Heart Transplant 1988; 7: 23–25.

[7] Kacet S, Molin F, Lacroix D. Bipolar atrial triggered pacing to restore normal chronotropic responsiveness in an orthotopic cardiac transplant patient. PACE 1991; 14: 1444–1447.

[8] Mandel W, Hayakawa H, Danzig RD, Marcus HS. Evaluation of sino-atrial function in man by overdrive suppression. Circulation 1971; 44: 59–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[9] Narula OS, Samet P, Javier RP. Significance of the sinus node recovery time. Circulation 1972; 45: 140–158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[10] Bexton RS, Nathan AW, Hellestrand KJ. Sinoatrial function after cardiac transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 712–723.[Abstract]

[11] Scott CD, Dark JH, McComb JM. Sinus node function after cardiac transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 1334–1341.[Abstract]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Can, K. Liao, and D. G. Benditt Residual recipient right atrial tissue responsive to atropine 10 years following 'bi-caval' orthotopic heart-lung transplantation Europace, February 1, 2009; 11(2): 264 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Lim and H. Marshall Broad complex tachycardia and atrioventricular dissociation in a patient with heart transplant Europace, February 1, 2009; 11(2): 265 - 267. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract FREE Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to citation manager Request Permissions Disclaimer Google Scholar Articles by Holt, N.D. Articles by McComb, J.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holt, N.D. Articles by McComb, J.M. Social Bookmarking          What's this?