© 1999 by European Society of Cardiology
Placement of atrial pacing leads during atrial fibrillation
Feasibility and subsequent lead performance
University Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, U.K
AIMS: To assess the feasibility of placing permanent atrial pacing leads during atrial fibrillation (AF) and whether such leads function satisfactorily.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective study of 17 consecutive patients in whom permanent atrial leads were positioned during an episode of paroxysmal AF. Fluoroscopic pos-ition (figure of 8 or side-to-side movement and anterior position in RAO projection), lead impedance (>300 but <1000 ohms) and intracardiac electrogram (average peak to peak amplitude >1 mV) were used to define an acceptable lead position. At 8 weeks post implant we measured: pulse duration pacing threshold at 5 V; lead impedance at 5 V and 0·5 ms; intracardiac electrogram (EGM) signal amplitude. At the end of the study we reviewed patients to establish whether AF had become permanent. In all patients, follow-up demonstrated satisfactory lead function. All leads had impedances between 300 and 1000 ohms. Pacing thresholds were all <0·1 ms at 5 V. Mean atrial EGM amplitude seen in sinus rhythm was 3·3 mV (range 1·28·4); in patients where all follow-up was in AF it was 2·1 mV (range 1·52·5). Nine patients (53%) developed permanent AF.
CONCLUSION: Placing atrial leads during AF is feasible using the technique described. However, some patients progress to chronic AF, eliminating the benefits of atrial pacing.
Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, permanent pacing leads, implantation technique, atrial electrograms, atrial sensing by pacemakers
Correspondence: Dr H. J. Marshall, University Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, U.K
[1] Kannel WB, Abbott RD, Savage DD, McNamara PM. Epidemiologic features of atrial fibrillation; the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 10181022.[Abstract]
[2] Murgatroyd FD and Camm AJ. Atrial Arrhythmias. Lancet 1993; 341: 13171322.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[3] Stangl K, Seitz K, Wirtzfeld A, Alt E, Blomer H. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1990; 13: 20802085.
[4] Andersen HR, Theusen L, Bagger JP, Vestrlund T, Thompson PE. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome. Lancet 1997; 350: 12101216.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[5] Marshall HJ, Harris Z, Griffith MJ, Gammage MD. Atrio-ventricular node ablation and implantation of dual chamber mode-switching pacemakers: effective treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart 1998; 79: 543547.
[6] Walker PR, Papouchado M, James MA, Clarke LM. Pacing failure due to flecainide acetate. PACE 1985; 8: 900902.
[7] Dohrmann ML and Goldschlager NF. Myocardial stimulation threshold in patients with cardiac pacemakers: effect of physiologic variables, pharmacologic agents and lead electrodes. Cardiol Clin 1985; 3: 527537.[Medline]
[8] Kerr CR and Mason MA. Amplitude of atrial electrical activity during sinus rhythm and during atrial flutter-fibrillation. PACE 1985; 8: 348355.
[9] Wood MA, Moskovljievic P, Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA. Comparison of bipolar atrial electrogram amplitude in sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. PACE 1996; 19: 150156.
[10] Mond HG, Hua W, Wang CC. Atrial pacing leads: the clinical contribution of steroid elution. PACE 1995; 18: 16011608.
[11] Clarke M, Sutton R, Ward D. Recommendations for pacemaker prescription for symptomatic bradycardia: Report of a working group of the British Pacing and Electrophysi-ology Group. Br Heart J 1991; 66: 185191.
[12] Murphy CF, Bulbeck VJ, Chase RC, Lawson CS, Dawkins KD, Morgan JM. Is mode-switching DDDR pacing superior to VVIR pacing following atrioventricular node ablation for refractory atrial fibrillation. Heart 1996; 75: 65.
[13] Kamalvand K, Tan K, Kotsakis A, Buchnall C, Sulke N. Is mode-switching beneficial? A randomised study in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 496504.[Abstract]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||