Interatrial conduction in the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: from anatomy to cardiac signals and new treatment modalities
Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: pyotr.platonov{at}med.lu.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Areas of slow conduction and conduction block are important prerequisites for re-entry known to underlie atrial fibrillation (AF). Experimental and clinical data show that AF is associated with global lowering of atrial propagation velocity and the presence of defects in the interatrial conduction routes. The increasing data from anatomical studies demonstrate the possible prerequisites for conduction disturbances that could be primarily because of anatomical variability in interatrial connections or because of age-related development of fibrotic changes in the atrial musculature. More detailed descriptions of the structure and function of the interatrial connections other than Bachmann's bundle have become available and, as a result, the role of these connections in the mechanisms of AF is increasingly appreciated. Interatrial pacing studies show promising results, but further studies on larger amounts of materials are required in order to identify the population of patients who would benefit more effectively from this treatment as well as the optimal pacing technique. Therefore, more extensive documentation is required before therapeutic modalities aimed at improving interatrial conduction will become a part of the clinical routine in the management of AF patients.
Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, Interatrial conduction, Anatomy
| Conduction velocity in the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of triggers in the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF) is well appreciated. However, the likelihood that a trigger can initiate the arrhythmia that would sustain itself requires an arrhythmic substrate in the atria and depends on the length of the wavelet defined as the product of the effective refractory period and the conduction velocity. Therefore, the wavelength must be shorter than the available substrate dimensions for re-entry to occur. In addition, the shorter wavelength increases the number of wavelets that could co-exist in the given atrial dimensions and thus increasing the likelihood that AF would sustain itself. This mechanism underlying AF has been confirmed in animal experiments and clinical studies that were recently reviewed by Nattel et al.1
Slow conduction in the atria can be diffuse, presumably either caused by fibrosis that is age-related2
or caused by coexisting conditions such as heart failure or hypertension.1
However, the conduction defect can also be local, critically located in one of the interatrial pathways of which Bachmann's bundle is the most well known. Indeed, the association between Bachmann's bundle block and AF has been shown in several studies.3
,4
Researches during recent years have further improved our knowledge of the anatomy of the interatrial connections and highlighted previously neglected areas.
The purpose of this review is to present the available data on the structure and function of interatrial connections as well as possible therapeutic modalities aimed at improving interatrial conduction in the management of AF patients.
| Anatomy of the interatrial pathways |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To the best of our knowledge, the first comprehensive description of the human heart and of the anatomy of the muscle bundles connecting the right and left atria had been found in an atlas published by Bourgery.5
Figure 1, reproduced from the atlas, clearly demonstrates that, in the mid-nineteenth century, there was knowledge about the cardiac musculature including the circumferential muscle bundle located at the anterior wall of the left atrium and connecting the right and left atrial appendages (Figure 1A). It was later named after George Bachmann who discovered its participation in the interatrial propagation of electrical impulses.6
Since then, this superior interatrial route has traditionally been considered a major pathway for the fast interatrial activation spread. Animal experiments have demonstrated that with a conduction velocity almost twice as high as the major part of the atrial myocardium (1.66 vs. 0.88 m/s),7
the effective refractory period of Bachmann's bundle is significantly longer than that of the right and left atrium (163 vs. 101 and 108 ms, respectively).8
Consequently, Bachmann's bundle may become blocked at a pacing rate when the adjacent atrial tissue can still be activated. This represents a potential substrate for re-entry with participation of Bachmann's bundle that has been documented experimentally.8
|
Catheter ablation techniques and the ability to treat arrhythmic targets with very high precision have revived the interest in cardiac anatomy. Over the past 10 years, the anatomy of the interatrial connections has been studied by several groups.9
|
| Function of the interatrial pathways |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surprisingly, little evidence exist in regard to the function of interatrial connections in humans. Soon after the introduction of electroanatomical mapping in clinical practice, Roithinger et al.14
The issue has been addressed in five studies that used either electroanatomical16
,17
or non-contact18
–20
mapping of the left atrium (Table 1). Of those studies, three reported conduction over Bachmann's bundle during sinus rhythm in the vast majority of the studied individuals.16
–18
The two other studies documented that an inferior route may also serve as a preferential route for interatrial conduction, suggesting that the importance of Bachmann's bundle may have been overestimated.19
,20
Yet another study published as an abstract in 2005 reported the absence of conduction over Bachmann's bundle during sinus rhythm in 5 of 13 patients with paroxysmal AF.21
Interestingly, our group has not been able to identify Bachmann's bundle using a serial slicing technique in about half of the heart specimens, i.e. in 7 of 15 cases in our initial report11
and in 9 of 21 cases in an expanded series 3 years later.13
In another report by Becker et al.2
fibro-fatty degeneration of Bachmann's bundle was common among patients with a history of AF.
|
Conduction during ectopic atrial rhythms seems to be depending entirely on the anatomical proximity of the arrhythmia focusing on certain interatrial pathways as studied using atrial pacing.18
One should bear in mind, however, that, except for one small study,17
left atrial mapping has been performed on patients admitted for ablation of AF. Thus, electrophysiology of normal interatrial conduction in healthy humans still remains largely unexplored.
| Atrial conduction defects in patients with atrial fibrillation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of non-invasive techniques exist that could be used for assessment of atrial conduction. The one most readily available in clinical practice is the standard 12-lead ECG, where P-wave duration and morphology can serve as indices of atrial conduction. In 1985, Bayes de Luna et al.3
40% of hospitalized patients.24
More sophisticated P-wave signal-averaging techniques have demonstrated an association between prolonged P-waves and a history of AF.4
,25
,26
Our group has shown that a history of lone AF was associated with particular P-wave morphology, primarily the presence of the biphasic (–/+) P-waves in the orthogonal Z-lead corresponding to the reverse (+/–) morphology in the V1–V2 chest leads and thus suggesting the presence of a conduction delay in the posterior interatrial bundles affecting the way the activation wavefront travels between the atria.27
In a recent study, similar findings were obtained using the same unfiltered P-wave signal-averaged ECG technique in the cohort of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy known for their higher risk of developing AF. Compared with healthy controls, patients with cardiomyopathy more often showed biphasic (–/+) P-wave morphology in the lead Z indicating defective conduction via the posterior interatrial connections as well as biphasic (+/–) P-waves in the inferior lead Y meeting criteria for complete interatrial block28
(Figure 3). Using high-density electroanatomical mapping in the proximal CS during sinus rhythm, we have confirmed that conduction velocity of the inferior route was indeed lower in AF patients compared with patients without a history of AF.29
|
However, it is important to note that solid data linking histological substrates to deteriorated atrial conduction and higher propensity of AF are still lacking. Diffuse structural abnormalities such as vacuolar degeneration, inflammatory changes, and fibrosis were reported in patients with lone AF.30
| Is there a way to improve impaired conduction? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pharmacological approach
Pharmacologically enhanced atrial conductivity could be beneficial for those patients with AF who have this mechanism linked to the arrhythmia development. This forms an attractive target for clinical research. The studies of substances that enhance the conductivity of atrial tissue have now become available, but their protective effect against AF, as observed in experiments, was quite limited.31
The issue was addressed in two clinical trials where blockers of the rennin–angiotensine system were tested on AF patients demonstrating that irbesartan35
and enalapril36
in addition to amiodarone improved sinus rhythm survival after electrical cardioversion of persistent AF. The documented abilities of these drugs to affect structural atrial changes32
make them attractive targets for future research. However, in a recent placebo-controlled CAPRAF study, candesartan alone was not effective in reducing the recurrence rate after electrical cardioversion of AF.37
Atrial resynchronisation by pacing
Discussion of the interventions aimed at improving atrial conduction would not be complete without a brief overview of the special pacing modalities used in the management of AF. Shortening of atrial activation can be achieved either by pacing the right and the left atria separately with electrodes in right atrial appendage (RAA) and distal CS (biatrial pacing) or by pacing RAA and the ostium of CS (dual-site right atrial pacing). Although initial attempts with biatrial38
,39
and dual-site right atrial40
pacing showed promising results, the results of a lager trial were not conclusive.41
Technical complexity of dual-site atrial pacing methodology further complicates its clinical use.
Single-site interatrial septal pacing represents a simpler42
and therefore potentially more attractive approach to improve deteriorated interatrial conduction aimed at a reduction of AF burden. However, no consensus has yet been achieved with regard to the selection of the optimal pacing site (Table 2).
|
Bailin et al.43
Pacing in the vicinity of the posterior–inferior interatrial route (i.e. near CS ostium or posterior to fossa ovalis) was assessed in several randomized trials. Padeletti et al.44
showed that pacing at the triangle of Koch had a better potential to prevent AF than conventional pacing at RAA. This could not be confirmed in a later performed multicenter ASPECT trial.45
However, in this trial, septal lead position varied among investigators and the relative efficacy of individual septal lead locations (low, middle, or high septal) could not be evaluated. In another multicenter trial by De Voogt et al.46
(OASES), low atrial septal pacing in combination with an atrial overdrive pacing algorithm demonstrated an advantage compared with pacing from the high right atrium. Findings from the most recent trial by Hermida et al.47
have also supported the concept of a positive effect of low atrial septal pacing for reduction of AF burden. Similar findings were obtained in a smaller observational study.48
Given the complexity and structural variability of interatrial routes, it is unlikely that a single pacing electrode location would fit all patients with paroxysmal AF. No direct comparison of the antiarrhythmic effects of the single-site pacing at the superior or the inferior interatrial septum has been published either. Attempts to identify the exact location of the interatrial routes for optimization of septal pacing are being made, using a search for either locating the earliest breakthrough site on the right atrial septum during left atrial pacing49
or finding a pacing site at the interatrial septum that is associated with the shortest activation time at the high right atrium and distal CS.50
The clinical value of these approaches has yet to be confirmed.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Areas of slow conduction and conduction block are important prerequisites for re-entry known to underlie AF. Experimental and clinical data show that AF is associated with global lowering of atrial conduction velocity and the presence of local conduction defects critically located in the vicinity of interatrial conduction routes. The increasing amounts of data that currently become available from anatomical studies demonstrate possible prerequisites for conduction disturbances that could either be primarily because of the anatomical variability of interatrial connections or, secondary, because of the age-related development of fibrotic changes in the atrial musculature. The ability of rennin–angiotensine system blockers to attenuate fibrosis has recently been documented in experimental studies showing a beneficial effect in AF patients, possibly giving rise to the development of a structural therapy of AF. Promising results from the interatrial septal pacing studies also warrants further studies on a larger material. The section of patients that would benefit from this treatment is still poorly defined and the selection of a pacing technique is not individually tailored. More extensive documentation is therefore required before therapeutic modalities aimed at improving interatrial conduction will become a part of clinical routine in the management of AF patients.
| Funding |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The work was supported by Governmental funding of Clinical research within the NHS.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[1] Nattel S, Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Brundel BJ, Rivard L. Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: lessons from animal models. Prog Cardiovasc Dis (2005) 48:9–28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[2] Becker AE. How structurally normal are human atria in patients with atrial fibrillation? Heart Rhythm (2004) 1:627–31.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[3] Bayes de Luna A, Fort de Ribot R, Trilla E, et al. Electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic study of interatrial conduction disturbances with left atrial retrograde activation. J Electrocardiol (1985) 18:1–13.[Web of Science][Medline]
[4] Agarwal YK, Aronow WS, Levy JA, Spodick DH. Association of interatrial block with development of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol (2003) 91:882.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[5] Bourgery JBM. Traite complete l'anatomi de l'homme. Paris: N.H. Jacob. 1831–54.
[6] Bachmann G. The inter-auricular time interval. Am J Physiol (1916) 41:309–20.
[7] Hayashi H, Lux RL, Wyatt RF, Burgess MJ, Abildskov JA. Relation of canine atrial activation sequence to anatomic landmarks. Am J Physiol (1982) 242:H421–H428.[Web of Science][Medline]
[8] Duytschaever M, Danse P, Eysbouts S, Allessie M. Is there an optimal pacing site to prevent atrial fibrillation?: an experimental study in the chronically instrumented goat. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2002) 13:1264–71.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[9] Ho SY, Sanchez-Quintana D, Cabrera JA, Anderson RH. Anatomy of the left atrium: implications for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (1999) 10:1525–33.[Web of Science][Medline]
[10] Chauvin M, Shah D, Haissaguerre M, Marcellin L, Brechenmacher C. The anatomic basis of connections between the coronary sinus musculature and the left atrium in humans. Circulation (2000) 101:647–52.
[11] Platonov PG, Mitrofanova LB, Chireikin LV, Olsson SB. Morphology of inter-atrial conduction routes in patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace (2002) 4:183–92.
[12] Kozlowski D, Kaminski R, Piwko G, et al. Preliminary study of external interatrial muscle fascicles. Folia Morphol (Warsz) (2002) 61:97–101.[Medline]
[13] Mitrofanova L, Ivanov V, Platonov PG. Anatomy of the inferior interatrial route in humans. Europace (2005) 7:49–55.
[14] Roithinger FX, Cheng J, SippensGroenewegen A, et al. Use of electroanatomic mapping to delineate transseptal atrial conduction in humans. Circulation (1999) 100:1791–7.
[15] Hertervig E, Yuan S, Liu S, Kongstad O, Luo J, Olsson SB. Electroanatomic mapping of transseptal conduction during coronary sinus pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Scand Cardiovasc J (2003) 37:340–3.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[16] Lemery R, Birnie D, Tang AS, et al. Normal atrial activation and voltage during sinus rhythm in the human heart: an endocardial and epicardial mapping study in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2007) 18:402–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[17] De Ponti R, Ho SY, Salerno-Uriarte JA, Tritto M, Spadacini G. Electroanatomic analysis of sinus impulse propagation in normal human atria. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2002) 13:1–10.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[18] Lemery R, Soucie L, Martin B, Tang AS, Green M, Healey J. Human study of biatrial electrical coupling: determinants of endocardial septal activation and conduction over interatrial connections. Circulation (2004) 110:2083–9.
[19] Betts TR, Roberts PR, Morgan JM. High-density mapping of left atrial endocardial activation during sinus rhythm and coronary sinus pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2004) 15:1111–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[20] Markides V, Schilling RJ, Ho SY, Chow AW, Davies DW, Peters NS. Characterization of left atrial activation in the intact human heart. Circulation (2003) 107:733–9.
[21] Koskinen R, Vitikainen A, Mäntynen V, Mäkijärvi M, Parikka H, Toivonen L. Non-invasive detection of conduction defect in bachman's bundle by magnetocardiographic mapping in patients with paroxysmal lone arial fibrillation [abstract]. Heart Rhythm (2005) 2:103.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[22] Dong J, Zrenner B, Schreieck J, et al. Catheter ablation of left atrial focal tachycardia guided by electroanatomic mapping and new insights into interatrial electrical conduction. Heart Rhythm (2005) 2:578–91.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[23] Ariyarajah V, Mercado K, Apiyasawat S, Puri P, Spodick DH. Correlation of left atrial size with p-wave duration in interatrial block. Chest (2005) 128:2615–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[24] Frisella ME, Robinette MM, Spodick DH. Interatrial block: pandemic prevalence concealed by anachronistic electrocardiographic standards. Clin Cardiol (2005) 28:381–3.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[25] Stafford PJ, Turner I, Vincent R. Quantitative analysis of signal-averaged P waves in idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol (1991) 68:751–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[26] Steinberg JS, Zelenkofske S, Wong SC, Gelernt M, Sciacca R, Menchavez E. Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation (1993) 88:2618–22.
[27] Platonov PG, Calrson J, Ingemansson M, et al. Detection of inter-atrial conduction defects with unfiltered signal-averaged P-wave ECG in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Europace (2000) 2:32–41.
[28] Holmqvist F, Platonov P, Carlson J, et al. Variable interatrial conduction illustrated in a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy population. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol (2007) 12:227–36.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[29] Xia Y, Hertervig E, Kongstad O, et al. Deterioration of interatrial conduction in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: electroanatomic mapping of the right atrium and coronary sinus. Heart Rhythm (2004) 1:548–53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[30] Frustaci A, Chimenti C, Bellocci F, Morgante E, Russo MA, Maseri A. Histological substrate of atrial biopsies in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Circulation (1997) 96:1180–4.
[31] Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Sakabe M, Haugan K, Hennan JK, Nattel S. Model-dependent effects of the gap junction conduction-enhancing antiarrhythmic peptide rotigaptide (ZP123) on experimental atrial fibrillation in dogs. Circulation (2007) 115:310–8.
[32] Li D, Shinagawa K, Pang L, et al. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on the development of the atrial fibrillation substrate in dogs with ventricular tachypacing-induced congestive heart failure. Circulation (2001) 104:2608–14.
[33] Celik T, Iyisoy A, Kursaklioglu H, et al. The comparative effects of telmisartan and ramipril on P-wave dispersion in hypertensive patients: a randomized clinical study. Clin Cardiol (2005) 28:298–302.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[34] Fuenmayor AJ, Moreno G, Landaeta A, Fuenmayor AM. Inter-atrial conduction time shortens after blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Int J Cardiol (2005) 102:443–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[35] Madrid AH, Bueno MG, Rebollo JM, et al. Use of irbesartan to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective and randomized study. Circulation (2002) 106:331–6.
[36] Ueng KC, Tsai TP, Yu WC, et al. Use of enalapril to facilitate sinus rhythm maintenance after external cardioversion of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Results of a prospective and controlled study. Eur Heart J (2003) 24:2090–8.
[37] Tveit A, Grundvold I, Olufsen M, et al. Candesartan in the prevention of relapsing atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol (2007) 120:85–91.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[38] D'Allonnes GR, Pavin D, Leclercq C, et al. Long-term effects of biatrial synchronous pacing to prevent drug-refractory atrial tachyarrhythmia: a nine-year experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2000) 11:1081–91.[Web of Science][Medline]
[39] Mirza I, Gill J, Bucknall C, Holt P. Prevention of refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with sequential biatrial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol (1999).
[40] Prakash A, Delfaut P, Krol RB, Saksena S. Regional right and left atrial activation patterns during single- and dual-site atrial pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol (1998) 82:1197–204.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[41] Saksena S, Prakash A, Ziegler P, et al. Improved suppression of recurrent atrial fibrillation with dual-site right atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol (2002) 40:1140–50. discussion 51–2.
[42] Acosta H, Pothula VR, Rodriguez M, Ramadas S, Castellanos A. Placement of a pacing lead at the inferior portion of the interatrial septum without special tools. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol (2007) 30:S84–S87.[Medline]
[43] Bailin SJ, Adler S, Giudici M. Prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation by pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2001) 12:912–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[44] Padeletti L, Pieragnoli P, Ciapetti C, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of right atrial appendage pacing versus interatrial septum pacing for prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus bradycardia. Am Heart J (2001) 142:1047–55.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[45] Padeletti L, Purerfellner H, Adler SW, et al. Combined efficacy of atrial septal lead placement and atrial pacing algorithms for prevention of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2003) 14:1189–95.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[46] De Voogt W, De Vusser P, Stockman D, et al. Atrial fibrillation suppression reduces atrial fibrillation burden on patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and class 1 & 2 pacemaker indication - the OASES study. Eur Heart J (2003) 24:369.
[47] Hermida JS, Kubala M, Lescure FX, et al. Atrial septal pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus node dysfunction: results of a randomized controlled study. Am Heart J (2004) 148:312–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[48] Kale M, Bennett DH. Atrial septal pacing in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Int J Cardiol (2002) 82:167–75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[49] Miyazaki H, Noma K, Date T, et al. Atrial septal pacing to resynchronize atrial contraction and improve atrial transport function. J Cardiol (2005) 45:239–46.[Medline]
[50] Manolis AG, Katsivas AG, Vassilopoulos C, Koutsogeorgis D, Louvros NE. Prevention of atrial fibrillation by inter-atrial septum pacing guided by electrophysiological testing, in patients with delayed interatrial conduction. Europace (2002) 4:165–74.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

denotes interatrial bundles in the vicinity of the coronary sinus orifice (coronary sinus is removed). Reproduced from Bourgery.5
