Europace Advance Access originally published online on March 13, 2006
Europace 2006 8(4):251-254; doi:10.1093/europace/euj045
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Paradoxical effect of ajmaline in a patient with Brugada syndrome
Section of Arrhythmology, Division of CardiologyOspedale di Bentivoglio (BO), Unità Operativa di Cardiologiavia Marconi 35, 40010 Bentivoglio Italy
Manuscript submitted 5 April 2005. Accepted after revision 19 November 2005.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +39 051 6644589; fax: +39 051 6644383. E-mail address: biagio64{at}libero.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aims The typical Brugada ECG pattern consists of a prominent J-wave associated with ST-segment elevation localized in the right precordial leads V1V3. In many patients, the ECG presents periods of transient normalization and the Brugada-phenotype can be unmasked by the administration of class-I antiarrhythmics. Reports have documented the heterogeneity of the Brugada syndrome ECG-phenotype characterized by unusual localization of the ECG abnormalities in the inferior leads.
Case report A 51-year-old man, without detectable structural heart disease, was referred to us because of a history of syncope, dizziness, and palpitations. The ECG showed a J-wave and ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads, suggesting Brugada syndrome. As other causes of the ECG abnormalities were excluded, the patient underwent an electrophysiological study that documented easy induction of ventricular fibrillation. During infusion of ajmaline, new prominent J-waves and ST-segment elevation appeared in the inferior leads, whereas the basal ECG abnormalities in the right precordial leads normalized. After infusion of isoprenaline, the ECG-pattern resumed the typical Brugada pattern. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was recommended.
Conclusion In our patient, the double localization of the typical Brugada-pattern and the paradoxical effect of ajmaline on the ECG abnormalities confirmed the possibility of a phenotype heterogeneity in the Brugada syndrome.
Key Words: Brugada syndrome, J-wave, ST-segment, Electrocardiographic leads, Ajmaline
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brugada syndrome1
We describe a case of paradoxical effects of drug-challenge with ajmaline in a patient with Brugada syndrome with double localization, anterior and inferior wall, of the typical pattern of ECG abnormalities.
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 51-year-old man with mild hypertension on treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors and diuretics was referred to our cardiology department because of dizziness associated with brief palpitations. There was no family history of sudden death, but 11 years earlier the patient had syncope, without prodrome, while driving a car. On that occasion, the cause was ascribed to a not previously known small subarachnoid cyst, seen on cranial CT scan, and surgically removed. The patient had no preceding history of epilepsy or abnormal EEG. Physical examination, laboratory analysis, and chest X-rays were normal. The 12-lead ECG showed sinus rhythm with normal PQ, QRS, and corrected QT intervals; a slight coved-type ST-segment elevation associated with rSr' pattern was noted in V1, and a saddle-back type ST in V2 and V3 (Figure 1). Echocardiography showed normal cardiac structure and no thoracic abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging. Holter monitoring registered a total of 1543 premature ventricular, polymorphic, non-repetitive complexes (PVCs) and the heart-rate-variability parameters were normal (SDNN=120.3 ms, ASDNN 5=69.4 ms, SDANN 5=93.1 ms). The signal-averaged ECG did not show late ventricular potentials. Exercise stress testing was negative for induction of either transient acute myocardial ischaemia or arrhythmias.
|
The patient was taken to our electrophysiological (EP) laboratory with a diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. The EP study showed an HV interval of 68 ms, and PA and AH intervals were normal. Programmed atrial stimulation did not induce any arrhythmia, whereas ventricular fibrillation (VF) was easily induced by single ventricular premature beat at a drive cycle of 500 ms from the right ventricular outflow tract: this required D.C. shock (Figure 2). The drug-challenge was performed by intravenous administration of ajmaline (1 mg/kg over 5 min) producing from the sixth minute, a new gigantic, coved-type, down-sloping ST-segment elevation in leads II, III, and aVF, whereas the pre-existing ST-segment alterations in V1V3 were normalized (Figure 3). During administration of the drug, the patient developed spontaneous polymorphic PVCs in pairs and triplets. The ST-segment elevation at the inferior leads completely resolved with the administration of isoprenaline (0.02 µg/mL/min) and the right precordial leads resumed the typical Brugada-pattern. An acute coronary syndrome was ruled out either by serial troponin T sampling and by coronary angiography during which no coronary spasm was induced by ergonovine provocation. The genetic assessment, in January 2004, to investigate the presence of SCN5A gene mutations proved negative.
|
|
As the patient had no signs of heart, pulmonary, neurological, or metabolic disease, we confirmed the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome with variant phenotype characterized by double localization of the typical ECG abnormalities and paradoxical effect of ajmaline administration. The clinical picture was characterized by a history of unexplained syncope and dizziness with palpitations, the easy induction of VF during EP study and the young age of the patient, indicated the necessity to implant a cardioverter-defibrillator.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our case is the first description of a paradoxical effect of ajmaline on ECG abnormalities in a patient with Brugada syndrome featuring an alteration of typical ECG-phenotype from the right precordial leads to the inferior leads.
In the 90 s, association between idiopathic VF and ST-segment elevation with prominent J-wave in the inferior leads had been reported in southeast Asian patients.7
10
More recently, anecdotal reports of patients with Brugada syndrome and anomalous localization of ECG-phenotype confined to the inferior leads have also been published.11
14
Potet et al.13
identified, in members of a French family, a novel G752R SCN5A mutation leading to a typical ST-segment elevation and prominent J-wave either in the inferior or in the right precordial leads. Moreover, the proband showed spontaneous typical Brugada ECG-phenotype restricted to the inferior leads. On pharmacological testing with flecainide, he displayed aggravation of ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads and new appearance of drug-induced ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads. Our patient was in contrast to that of Potet et al.13
as on drug-challenge with ajmaline, the pre-existing and typical ECG abnormalities in V1V3 fully resolved but appeared in leads II, III, and aVF. More recently, Riera et al.14
presented a case of spontaneous fatal VF in a young man with Brugada syndrome whose ECG at rest showed a persistent down-sloping ST-segment elevation in leads II, III, and aVF with specular horizontal ST-depression in V4 and V5 mimicking acute subendocardial ischaemia. Unfortunately, the patient had nocturnal sudden cardiac death and no pharmacological tests or genetic studies were available.14
In the concealed form of Brugada syndrome, a drug-challenge with class-I antiarrhythmics can unmask the ECG abnormalities by sodium channel blockade, enhancing the effect of the transient outward current (Ito) on the action potential.5
,6
As the transient outward current is better represented on the right ventricular than on the left ventricular epicardium, the transmural (epicardiumendocardium) voltage gradient is amplified in the right precordial leads where usually the typical ECG repolarization abnormalities are displayed.15
19
We speculate that localization of Brugada ECG-phenotype in the inferior leads is likely to be multifactorial. The following hypothetical explanations are possible: (1) a higher density of Ito as well as a lower density of INa in the inferior wall, rather than in the right ventricle; (2) an anomalous quantitative and qualitative distribution of ionic channels in the inferior wall because of an undetectable organic disorder (e.g. ischaemia or infection) leading to myocardial fibrosis; (3) greater parasympathetic innervation or sympathetic dysfunction of the inferior wall. All these conditions may be responsible for hypersensitivity to ajmaline which was localized to the inferior wall, determining the appearance of typical Brugada pattern in the inferior leads. In contrast, administration of isoprenaline, a ß-agonist, normalized ECG abnormalities in the inferior leads probably via augmentation L-type calcium current (ICa) resulting in a restored local balance of inward and outward currents.
The atypical effect of drug-challenge on the right precordial leads in our patient remains unexplained. The contrasting effects of ajmaline and isoprenaline on the ECG changes which may be interpreted either as an unknown local paradoxical effect of ajmaline on sodium channels because of the genetic abnormality, or as reciprocal manifestation of the ST-segment elevation in the inferior wall annulling the effect on the anterior wall.
In our patient the double localization of the typical Brugada-pattern and the paradoxical effect of ajmaline on the ECG abnormalities confirmed the possibility of phenotype heterogeneity in the Brugada syndrome. However, in our patient, the suspicions of Brugada syndrome were based on spontaneous and typical ECG abnormalities in the right precordial leads, with changes in the inferior leads being drug-induced.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[1] . Brugada P and Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 13916.[Abstract]
[2] . Corrado D, Nava A, Buja G, et al. Familial cardiomyopathy underlies the syndrome of right bundle branch block, ST segment elevation and sudden death. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 4438.[Abstract]
[3] . Chen Q, Kirsch GE, Zhang D, et al. Genetic basis and molecular mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Nature 1998; 392: 2936.[CrossRef][Medline]
[4] . Gussak I, Bjerregaard P, Hammil SC. Clinical diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 16358.
[5] . Brugada J and Brugada P. Further characterization of the syndrome of right bundle branch block, ST segment elevation, and sudden cardiac death. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 8: 32531.[Web of Science][Medline]
[6] . Gussak I, Antzelevitch C, Bjerregaard P, et al. The Brugada syndrome: clinical, electrophysiologic and genetic aspects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 515.
[7] . Aizawa Y, Tamura M, Chinushi M, et al. An attempt at electrical catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic area in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Am Heart J 1992; 123: 25760.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[8] . Aizawa Y, Tamura M, Chinushi M, et al. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and bradycardia-dependent intraventricular block. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 14734.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[9] . Matsuo K, Shimizu W, Kurita T, et al. Increased dispersion of repolarization time determined by monophasic action potentials in two patients with familial idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9: 7483.[Web of Science][Medline]
[10] . Takagi M, Aihara N, Takaki H, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with spontaneous or inducible ventricular fibrillation without apparent heart disease presenting with J wave and ST segment elevation in inferior leads. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2000; 11: 8448.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[11] . Porres JM, Brugada J, Urbistondo V, Garcìa F, Reviejo K, Marco P. Fever unmasking the Brugada syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25: 16468.[CrossRef][Medline]
[12] . Kalla H, Yan G-X, Marinchak R. Ventricular fibrillation in patient with prominent J (Osborn) waves and ST segment elevation in the inferior electrocardiographic leads: a Brugada syndrome variant? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2000; 11: 958.[Web of Science][Medline]
[13] . Potet F, Mabo P, Le Coq G, et al. Novel Brugada SCN5A mutation leading to ST segment elevation in the inferior or the right precordial leads. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14: 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
[14] . Riera ARP, Ferreira C, Schapachnik E, et al. Brugada syndrome with atypical ECG: downsloping ST-segment elevation in inferior leads. J Electrocardiol 2004; 37: 1014.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[15] . Yan G-X and Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the electrocardiographic J wave. Circulation 1996; 93: 3729.
[16] . Antzelevitch C. The Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9: 5136.[Web of Science][Medline]
[17] . Aling M and Wilde A. Brugada syndrome: clinical data and suggested pathophysiological mechanism. Circulation 1999; 99: 66673.
[18] . Dumaine R, Towbin JA, Brugada P, et al. Ionic mechanism responsible for the electrocardiographic phenotype of the Brugada syndrome are temperature dependent. Circ Res 1999; 85: 8039.
[19] . Yan G-X and Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the Brugada syndrome and other mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis associated with ST segment elevation. Circulation 1999; 100: 16606.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Haissaguerre, F. Sacher, A. Nogami, N. Komiya, A. Bernard, V. Probst, S. Yli-Mayry, P. Defaye, Y. Aizawa, R. Frank, et al. Characteristics of recurrent ventricular fibrillation associated with inferolateral early repolarization role of drug therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 17, 2009; 53(7): 612 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



