© 2004 by European Society of Cardiology
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Impact of age and blood pressure on the lower arterial pressure limit for maintenance of consciousness during passive upright posture in healthy vasovagal fainters: preliminary observations*
Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, United States
Manuscript submitted 22 February 2004. Accepted after revision 15 April 2004.
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-612-625-4401; fax: +1-612-624-4937. E-mail address: bendi001{at}umn.edu (D.G. Benditt).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Maintenance of consciousness importantly depends on systemic arterial blood pressure (BP) remaining above the lower pressure limit for cerebrovascular autoregulation. This study evaluated the impact of age and baseline arterial blood pressure (BP) on the BP recorded at onset of syncope in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing passive head-up tilt (HUT) testing for suspected vasovagal syncope. Since hypertension is thought to shift the lower autoregulation point to higher values, and since older healthy patients tend to have higher BP than younger individuals, we hypothesized that even among healthy individuals HUT-induced syncope would occur at higher BP in older compared with younger subjects. Three groups of otherwise healthy individuals who had positive HUT were identified: Group 1: <25 years, n=17; Group 2: 2559 years, n=18; and Group 3:
60 years, n=7. As expected, baseline arterial systolic blood pressure of patients
60 years (162±37 mmHg) was significantly higher than in the other two groups (Group 1: <25 years, 116±15 mmHg; Group 2: 2559 years, 128±12 mmHg). Further, the
60 age group tolerated upright posture for a longer period before syncope than did younger patients. However, despite a trend for BP at syncope to increase with age, differences were small (Group 3:
60 years, 61±15 mmHg, Group 2: 2559 years, 58±6 mmHg, and Group 1: 54±16 mmHg) and were not statistically significant. Thus, in generally healthy individuals, age and baseline BP has only a minor effect on the lower limit of BP necessary for maintenance of consciousness. On the other hand, higher baseline BP provides older individuals a greater blood pressure reserve for maintenance of consciousness compared with younger subjects.
Key Words: syncope, cerebral autoregulation, head-up tilt testing
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Maintenance of consciousness importantly depends on maintaining systemic arterial pressure at a value greater than the lower limit of cerebrovascular blood flow autoregulation [1
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study population comprised only apparently healthy patients who developed head-up tilt (HUT) induced syncope during diagnostic testing for evaluation of syncope of unknown origin, and in whom an intra-arterial line was used to document blood pressure during testing. In each case the medical history suggested a neurally mediated vasovagal faint as the cause of syncope, but head-up tilt testing was recommended in an attempt to substantiate the diagnosis. All patients were free of structural heart (including left ventricular hypertrophy) or cardiovascular disease as assessed by medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. None of these patients was considered hypertensive prior to this evaluation.
All data and end-points were collected prospectively in patients undergoing tilt-table testing. However, in order to insure a relatively healthy study population, patients were excluded from this analysis if they were taking any cardiac or antihypertensive medications on a long-term basis, apart from aspirin. In particular, care was taken to exclude patients with diastolic hypertension (defined as a resting diastolic pressure >90 mmHg in the absence of medications) or significant systolic hypertension (>165 mmHg in the absence of medications), diabetes mellitus, suspected primary autonomic dysfunction, or suspected orthostatic syncope.
Written informed consent was obtained of all patients prior to commencing HUT, using an investigational review board/ethics committee approved document. All cardioactive medications were withheld for approximately 48 h prior to study. In brief, the HUT protocol comprised an equilibration period in the supine position of 2030 min following placement of intra-vascular cannulae, after which patients were tilted to 70 degrees head-up position [6,
7]
. The study was terminated at the point at which loss of consciousness occurred or at onset of intolerable pre-syncopal symptoms associated with systemic hypotension with or without overt bradycardia. Patients were returned to the supine position at test termination.
Systolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously throughout the study. For purposes of analysis five time points during upright posture were selected: (1) 0%, baseline upright position, (2) 25% of time to syncope, (3) 50% of time to syncope, (4) 75% of time to syncope, and (5) 100%, at the onset of the syncopal event. Percent time of HUT was used instead of absolute clock time in order to permit patient-to-patient comparison, since individual patients became syncopal at different time points during the period of upright posture.
The tip of the fluid-filled intra-arterial cannula system (placed via percutaneous access to the femoral artery) was positioned at approximately the level of the renal arteries. This introduced a potential consistent (across all patients) measurement error due to vertical displacement between the renal arteries and the carotid arteries. This error was minimized by placement of the pressure transducer at approximately shoulder level with the patient in the upright position.
| Data analysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The study population was divided into three age groups: Group 1: <25 years (n=17), Group 2: 2559 years (n=18), and Group 3:
60 years (n=7). To account for multiple measurements, ANOVA was used to determine significant differences between the groups. A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data from 43 patients (11 males and 32 females) were evaluated. Patient age ranged from 13 years to 82 years.
Baseline blood pressure
In the baseline upright position, approximately one minute after assumption of upright posture, the mean arterial systolic blood pressure of patients
60 years was 162±37 mmHg. This value was significantly higher than were comparable measurements in either patients 2559 years,128±12 mmHg (P=0.0312), or patients <25 years, 116±15 mmHg (P=0.0063). Diastolic pressures did not differ across groups.
During the initial course of exposure to upright posture (i.e., at 25% and 50% of HUT duration), patients
60 years (Group 3) maintained an arterial systolic blood pressure significantly greater than that recorded in younger patients (Fig. 1). Subsequently, however, as pressures fell toward values associated with syncope, differences tended to vanish.
|
Arterial systolic blood pressure at syncope
At syncope (i.e., 100% HUT duration) there was a trend toward higher arterial pressure values in patients who had the higher baseline arterial pressures, but differences were not statistically significant (see Fig. 2). Similarly, age-related differences were small and not statistically significant (Group 3,
60 years, 61±15 mmHg; Group 2, 2559 years, 58±6 mmHg; and Group 1, 54±16 mmHg) (Fig. 3, lower panel). However, age-related difference in blood pressure reserve (Fig. 3, upper panel) was more clear, and appeared to increase with increasing age (MannWhitney U test: Group 1 vs Group 2, P=NS; Group 1 vs Group 3, P=0.0008; Group 2 vs Group 3, P=0.0085).
|
|
Heart rate
Mean heart rates, and heart rate changes during HUT did not differ significantly in the three groups (Fig. 3). Heart rates tended to rise from tilt initiation to 75% of HUT duration. Not unexpectedly, the greatest decline in HR was seen between 75% of HUT duration and syncope onset (100% HUT duration) in all groups.
HUT duration
The duration of HUT prior to onset of syncope tended to increase with age (Table 1). Thus, on average the healthy
60 age group tolerated upright posture longer than did healthy younger patients (duration 26±18 min, vs Group 1 10±2 min and Group 3 15±3 min, both P=0.003).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study examined heart rate and blood pressure responses to HUT in apparently healthy individuals of various ages who were suspected of having a diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. Not unexpectedly, otherwise healthy patients
60 years of age had a mean baseline arterial systolic pressure higher than was present in younger individuals. It was expected, based upon previous reports [2| Age-related orthostatic tolerance |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Apart from the autoregulatory aspects of the cerebrovascular bed, arterial baroreceptor effects (i.e., modulation of heart rate and vascular resistance), and renal and hormonal influences, play important roles in long-term stabilization of cerebral blood flow [10
In a study of older individuals using HUT, Fitzpatrick et al. [15]
observed that among 27 control subjects, only 7.4% exhibited positive tests, a value far less than the 1520% commonly reported in younger age groups. A similar finding was noted by Grubb et al. [14]
in evaluation of the elderly. Among older control patients, none had a positive tilt response. Similarly, Bloomfield et al. [17]
evaluated 352 HUT outcomes, 133 of which were patients >65 years. They found that positive HUT occurred more frequently in younger patients, with >50% of tests being positive in patients
65 years, compared with 37% in those >65 years.
Lipsitz et al. [16]
also compared orthostatic tolerance (60 degrees for 15 min) in elderly and young volunteers. In this study mean arterial pressure actually tended to increase to a greater extent in the elderly, whereas heart rate increments were less. Forearm vascular flow and resistance changes did not appear to differ with age. In terms of susceptibility to syncope, among 22 elderly subjects (83±6 years), six had a history of unexplained syncope despite previous evaluation. However, only one of these six patients had a positive tilt test. Of the remaining 16 asymptomatic individuals, none had a positive test. By contrast, four of nine younger patients had positive responses during the same protocol; two of the four positive tests occurred in individuals with a previous history of unexplained syncope.
Based on these reports, it seems reasonable to conclude that generally healthy elderly patients exhibit greater passive orthostatic tolerance than do younger individuals. Our findings suggest that the basis for this finding is in large measure the tendency for otherwise healthy older individuals to exhibit higher baseline blood pressures, with relatively small upward shift of the lower limit of cerebral blood flow regulation. The result is a greater arterial pressure reserve for maintenance of consciousness.
| Limitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interpretation of the findings in this study is limited by the fact that the number of patients
60 years was small, the blood pressure range studied was limited, and determination of the time point at which syncope occurs is always imprecise. These factors were an inevitable consequence of both the inclusion of only a relatively healthy cohort (albeit with an element of moderate isolated systolic hypertension), and the need to avoid excessively prolonged periods of hypotension in severely symptomatic near-syncopal patients. A further limitation relates to the precision with which estimation of the blood pressure value at the time of syncope. In this regard, an intra-arterial catheter provided reliable pressure records. Consequently, the greatest potential error lay in the timing of the end-point (i.e., the precise moment of syncope). However, for the most part pressure changes occur slowly at that point in the study, thereby minimizing the impact of any error associated with timing of the end-point. | Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In relatively healthy patients undergoing evaluation for presumed vasovagal syncope, the lower limit of systemic pressure at which consciousness is maintained appears to increase with age. However, this effect is relatively minor compared with the increase in baseline upright blood pressure. As a result, there is a relatively larger difference between systemic pressures at baseline and at syncope in older patients, than is observed in younger subjects. This greater difference (i.e., the cerebral consciousness blood pressure reserve) may account for the greater than expected tolerance to passive upright posture observed in healthy older subjects compared to the young.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Wendy Markuson and Barry L.S. Detloff in preparation of the manuscript, and the Staff of the Electrophysiology Laboratory at Fairview-University Medical Center for assistance with the studies.
| Footnotes |
|---|
This study was supported in part by grants from Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN (A.E.G.) and the Midwest Arrhythmia Research Foundation, Edina, MN (N.S., C.E.). | References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[1] Paulson O.B., Strandgaard S., Edvinson L. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1990; 2: 161192.[Web of Science][Medline]
[2] Strandgaard S. and Paulson O.B. Regulation of cerebral blood flow in health and disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1992; 9:Suppl_6 S89S93.
[3] Barry D.I. Cerebral blood flow in hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1985; 7:Suppl 2 S94S98.
[4] Strandgaard S. The cerebral circulation on the elderly: the influence of age, vascular disease and antihypertensive treatment. Am J Ger Cardiol 1993; 2 3236.
[5] Scheinberg P., Blackburn I., Rich M., Saslaw M. Effects of aging on cerebral circulation and metabolism. Arch Neurol Psych 1953; 70: 7785.
[6] Brignole M., Alboni P., Benditt D., Bergfeldt L., Blanc J.J., Bloch Thomsen P.E., et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 12561306.
[7] Benditt D.G., Ferguson D.W., Grubb B.P., et al. Tilt-table testing for assessing syncope. An American College of Cardiology expert consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 263275.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[8] Dandona P., James I.M., Newbury P.A., et al. Cerebral blood flow in diabetes mellitus: evidence of abnormal cerebral vascular reactivity. Br Med J 1978; 2: 325326.
[9] Johnson R. Ageing and the autonomic nervous system. In Bannister R. and Mathias C.J. (Eds.). Autonomic Failure: A textbook of clinical disorders of the autonomic nervous system 1992; 2nd ed. Oxford UK Oxford University Press pp. 882903.
[10] Hainsworth R. Syncope and fainting: classification and pathophysiological basis. In Mathias C.J. and Bannister R. (Eds.). Autonomic failure. A textbook of clinical disorders of the autonomic nervous system 1999; 4th ed. Oxford Oxford University Press pp. 428436.
[11] Rowell L.B. Human circulation. Regulation during physical stress. 1986; New York Oxford University Press.
[12] Kapoor W., Snustad D., Peterson J., Wieland H., Cha R., Karpf M. Syncope in the elderly. Am J Med 1986; 80: 419428.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[13] Lipsitz L.A. Syncope in the elderly. Ann Int Med 1983; 99: 92105.
[14] Grubb B.P., Wolfe D., Samoil D., Mado E., Temesy-Armos P., Hahn H., et al. Recurrent unexplained syncope in the elderly: the use of head-upright tilt table testing in evaluation and management. J Am Geriat Soc 1992; 40: 11231128.[Web of Science][Medline]
[15] Fitzpatrick A.P., Theodorakis G., Vardas P., Sutton R. Methodology of head-up tilt testing in patients with unexplained syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 125130.[Abstract]
[16] Lipsitz L.A., Marks E.R., Koestner J.S., et al. Reduced susceptibility to syncope during postural tilt in old age: is beta-blockade protective? Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 27092712.
[17] Bloomfield D., Maurer M., Bigger T.J. Effects of age on outcome of tilt-table testing. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 10551058.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[18] McGavin A. and Hood S. The influence of sex and age on response to head-up tilt table testing in patients with recurrent syncope. Age Ageing 2001; 30: 295298.
[19] Kurbaan A.S., Bowker T.J., Wijesekera N., Franzen A.C., Heaven D., Itty S., et al. Age and hemodynamic responses to tilt testing in those with syncope of unknown origin. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 10041007.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Wieling, R. D. Thijs, N. van Dijk, A. A. M. Wilde, D. G. Benditt, and J. G. van Dijk Symptoms and signs of syncope: a review of the link between physiology and clinical clues Brain, October 1, 2009; 132(10): 2630 - 2642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Tan and S. W. Parry Vasovagal syncope in the older patient. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 12, 2008; 51(6): 599 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sutton Editorial comment Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(5): 463 - 463. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





