Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2008
Europace 2009 11(1):125-128; doi:10.1093/europace/eun312
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/125    most recent
eun312v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keuleers, S.
Right arrow Articles by Willems, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keuleers, S.
Right arrow Articles by Willems, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


CASE REPORTS

Wide complex tachycardia in a patient with a dual chamber pacemaker

Siegmund Keuleers, Bert Ferdinande, Wim Huybrechts and Rik Willems*

Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

* Corresponding author. Tel: +32 16 344 235; fax: +32 16 344 240. E-mail address: rik.willems{at}uz.kuleuven.be


    Case report
 Top
 Case report
 What is your diagnosis?
 References
 
An 81-year-old patient was admitted to the coronary care unit due to unstable angina and respiratory distress after urgent eye surgery for retinal detachment. He had a medical history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease. He underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement in 1998 and received a dual chamber pacemaker (Pulsar Max DR Guidant/Boston Scientific Natick, MA, USA) for third-degree heart block in 1999. The diagnosis of myocardial infarction complicated by acute pulmonary oedema was withheld, in view of a rise in troponin I level to a maximum of 14.66 µg/L (normal value <0.14 µg/L). ST-segment elevation could not be assessed because of ventricular pacing (Figure 1A). He developed respiratory failure for which mechanical ventilation was initiated. His echocardiography showed a depressed left ventricular function with an ejection fraction of 30% due to a large antero-lateral myocardial infarction. An urgent coronary angiography showed a critical stenosis of the left coronary artery, and a percutaneous coronary intervention of the native left anterior descending and circumflex artery was performed.


Figure 1
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 (A) ECG admission and (B) ECG tachycardia.

 
During the night, he developed sustained runs of a regular wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) of 110 bpm, with a right bundle branch appearance and a left axis (Figure 1B). During these runs that could last up to 10 min, the patient was mildly haemodynamically compromised.


    What is your diagnosis?
 Top
 Case report
 What is your diagnosis?
 References
 
History and 12-lead ECG
The previous cardiac history of the patient and the setting of an acute coronary syndrome make the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia highly likely.1Go Applying the classical diagnostic criteria of WCT on the 12-lead ECG, there is a regular, monomorphic (152 ms) WCT with right bundle branch morphology, superior axis, qR in V1 lead, and rS in V6 lead. There is no concordant pattern and are no clear signs of atrioventricular (AV) dissociation, favouring the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia. When using the Brugada criteria, there is no absence of an RS complex in the precordial leads, the ‘R-to-S interval >100 ms’ criterion is borderline, and there are no clear signs of AV dissociation, so again the morphology criteria in V1-2 and V6 leads must be used, favouring the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia.2Go

However, a newer algorithm proposed by Vereckei et al. raises the suspicion of supraventricular tachycardia: there are no clear signs of AV dissociation, no initial R wave in aVR, and there is a right bundle branch appearance. This obliges us to use the fourth criterion, the estimation of initial (vi) and terminal (vt) ventricular activation velocity ratio (vi/vt): the initial ventricular activation is the fastest in leads V3 to V5, showing a vi/vt ratio > 1, favouring supraventricular tachycardia.3Go,4Go Older ECGs all showed a paced rhythm, and there was no documentation of an underlying escape rhythm available. The cardiologist on call reprogrammed the pacemaker from DDD 60–120 bpm (AV delay 200 ms) to VVI 80 bpm to rule out pacemaker-mediated tachycardia. This however did not influence arrhythmia occurrence. Therefore, he judged it to be prudent to consider and treat the tachycardia as ventricular tachycardia, and intravenous amiodarone was started.

Pacing manoeuvres using the dual chamber pacemaker
The following day we used the pacemaker programmed to further differentiate this tachycardia. The tachycardia could be entrained both from the atrium and the ventricle. Atrial pacing at 125 bpm slowed down tachycardia, but it often resumed when pacing was stopped (Figure 2A), making a ventricular origin highly unlikely. Pacing in the ventricle at 125 bpm could stop tachycardia reliably (Figure 2B), arguing against an ectopic atrial tachycardia. Furthermore, the tachycardia could be stopped with iv administration of adenosine 6 mg (Figure 2C), suggestive of a re-entrant mechanism involving the AV node. The intracardiac EGM showed tachycardia with a short VA (40 ms) and a long AV (440 ms) interval (Figure 2D), diagnostic of AV nodal tachycardia.5Go The pacemaker was reprogrammed to VVI 40 bpm to document tachycardia initiation. An underlying slow sinus rhythm with a QRS morphology similar to tachycardia was seen along with gradual AV prolongation. When a critical AV delay was reached, retrograde conduction to the atrium was seen, thus initiating tachycardia (Figure 3). This phenomenon was repeatedly seen, confirming the diagnosis of typical slow–fast AV nodal tachycardia.


Figure 2
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 (A) EGM temporary AAI 125 bpm (permanent VVI 80 bpm), (B) EGM temporary VVI 125 bpm (permanent VVI 80 bpm), (C) EGM after adenosine 6 mg iv (permanent VVI 80 bpm), and (D) EGM tachycardia (permanent VVI 80 bpm).

 


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 EGM temporary VVI 40 bpm (permanent VVI 80 bpm).

 
Amiodarone was stopped, and beta-blocker therapy was intensified. The pacemaker was temporarily reprogrammed to DDD 80–120 bpm, with a short AV delay of 150 ms. These measures controlled the WCT, but despite maximal supportive therapy, the patient died due to septic shock because of pneumonia.

Conflict of interest: none declared.


    References
 Top
 Case report
 What is your diagnosis?
 References
 
[1] Tchou P, Young P, Mahmud R, Denker S, Jazayeri M, Akhtar M. Useful clinical criteria for the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia. Am J Med (1988) 84:53–6.[Web of Science][Medline]

[2] Brugada P, Brugada J, Mont L, Smeets J, Andries EW. A new approach to the differential diagnosis of a regular tachycardia with a wide QRS complex. Circulation (1991) 83:1649–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[3] Vereckei A, Duray G, Szenasi G, Altemose GT, Miller JM. Application of a new algorithm in the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia. Eur Heart J (2007) 28:589–600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

[4] Vereckei A, Duray G, Szénási G, Altemose GT, Miller JM. New algorithm using only lead aVR for differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia. Heart Rhythm (2008) 5:89–98.[Medline]

[5] Knight BP, Ebinger M, Oral H, Kim MH, Sticherling C, Pelosi F, et al. Diagnostic value of tachycardia features and pacing maneuvers during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol (2000) 36:574–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/125    most recent
eun312v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keuleers, S.
Right arrow Articles by Willems, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keuleers, S.
Right arrow Articles by Willems, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?