ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Adenosine can improve the intra-atrial conduction block along the mitral annulus during accessory pathway ablation
1 Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, VH B147, 1670 University Boulevard, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019, USA; 2 Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
Manuscript submitted 10 December 2007. Accepted after revision 21 January 2008.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 205 975 4724; fax: +1 205 975 4720. E-mail address: takumi-y{at}fb4.so-net.ne.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 10-year-old boy with a supraventricular tachycardia was referred for catheter ablation. An electrophysiologic study revealed a left lateral concealed accessory pathway (AP). A few radiofrequency (RF) applications targeting the AP resulted in an inadvertent intra-atrial conduction block at the mitral isthmus without any damage to the AP. Adenosine was then administered during left ventricular pacing. Soon after that, the conduction at the mitral isthmus recovered partially, and that change disappeared soon. Those findings suggested that the administration of adenosine may transiently recover the conduction at the mitral isthmus damaged by RF ablation.
Key Words: Adenosine, Accessory pathway, Mitral isthmus, Conduction block, Radiofrequency catheter ablation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been reported that an intra-atrial conduction block between the infero-lateral mitral annulus and left inferior pulmonary vein (mitral isthmus) can occur during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of left lateral accessory pathways (APs).1
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 10-year-old boy with a documented narrow QRS complex tachycardia underwent an electrophysiologic study and RF catheter ablation. At baseline, the 12-lead electrocardiograms exhibited no pre-excitation (Figure 1). Programmed atrial stimulation induced a supraventricular tachycardia with the earliest atrial activation in the distal coronary sinus (CS) (Figures 1 and 2). A definite diagnosis of an atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia was obtained by entrainment pacing from the right ventricle. A few RF applications were delivered using a 7-French, 4 mm tip ablation catheter around the most distal CS electrode pair during the tachycardia (Figure 2). During the RF application, an increase in the local VA interval at the CS recording sites with a change in the retrograde atrial activation sequence suddenly occurred without any change in the tachycardia cycle length or VA interval in the His bundle (HB) region (Figure 2). The earliest retrograde atrial activation was recorded from the HB region and the atrial activation sequence within the CS was from proximal to distal. For the purpose of evaluating the elimination of the target AP and existence of a second AP, 6 mg of adenosine was administered in a bolus form during right ventricular pacing. Soon after that, a prolongation of the VA interval at the HB region and within the CS, and a reversal of the atrial activation sequence at the distal CS electrode pairs suddenly occurred (Figure 3). At that time, the VA interval recorded from the ablation catheter positioned on the lateral side of the first RF lesion never changed. Those changes in the atrial activation disappeared soon. Six milligrams of adenosine was then administered during left ventricular pacing in the same manner as that during right ventricular pacing. Soon after that, a reversal in the atrial activation sequence on the distal CS electrode pairs suddenly occurred, however, no prolongation in the VA interval was observed within the CS (Figure 3). The cause of the reversal in the atrial activation sequence on the distal CS electrode pairs was explained by the shortening of the interval between the pacing stimulus and local atrial potential. Those changes in the atrial activations again disappeared soon. Finally, a successful ablation of the AP was achieved on the distal side of the first RF lesion. After that, the administration of the same dose of adenosine as before the successful ablation demonstrated VA dissociation during right ventricular pacing.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this case, an intra-atrial conduction block at the mitral isthmus occurred during RF ablation of a left lateral AP as previously reported.1
This case may provide a clinical implication for adenosine. Conduction block at the mitral isthmus may be targeted during the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and left atrial flutter.4
It has been recently reported that in pulmonary vein ablation, the use of additional RF applications to eliminate transient pulmonary vein reconnections induced by an adenosine injection leads to a reduction in the atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation, most likely due to the minimization of the subsequent pulmonary vein reconnection.5
Therefore, adenosine may also be useful for completing permanent conduction block during the catheter ablation of the mitral isthmus.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[1] Luria DM, Nemec J, Etheridge SP, Compton SJ, Klein RC, Chugh SS, et al. Intra-atrial conduction block along the mitral valve annulus during accessory pathway ablation: evidence for a left atrial "isthmus". J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2001) 12:744–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
[2] Tritto M, De Ponti R, Salerno-Uriarte JA, Spadacini G, Marazzi R, Moretti P, et al. Adenosine restores atrio-venous conduction after apparently successful ostial isolation of the pulmonary veins. Eur Heart J (2004) 25:2155–63.
[3] Freilich A, Tepper D. Adenosine and its cardiovascular effects. Am Heart J (1992) 123:1324–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[4] Jais P, Shah DC, Haissaguerre M, Hocini M, Peng JT, Takahashi A, et al. Mapping and ablation of left atrial flutters. Circulation (2000) 101:2928–34.
[5] Matsuo S, Yamane T, Date T, Inada K, Kanzaki Y, Tokuda M, et al. Reduction of AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation by eliminating ATP-induced transient venous re-conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2007) 18:704–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


