Europace Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2008
Europace 2008 10(10):1232-1234; doi:10.1093/europace/eun171
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASE REPORTS
Acute pulmonary oedema during cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation: management with the activation of intra-aortic balloon pump
Department of Cardiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ibni Sina Hastanesi, Kardiyoloji ABD 06600, Ankara, Turkey
Manuscript submitted 9 March 2008. Accepted after revision 29 May 2008.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +90 312 5956286; fax: +90 312 3125251. E-mail address: Basarcandemir{at}yahoo.com
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionCase reportDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In this report, we present the case of two patients who experienced the development of acute pulmonary oedema during biventricular pacemaker implantation for cardiac resynchronization therapy. In both the cases, the activation of an intra-aortic balloon pump improved the clinical condition and the operation could be completed, which would otherwise have to be postponed.
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionCase reportDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation may occasionally be hampered by adverse clinical events,1
which could even lead to cancellation of the procedure. In this case report, we described the case of two patients who experienced the development of acute pulmonary oedema during CRT implantation in whom the activation of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) helped complete the procedure. |
Case report |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionCase reportDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The clinical characteristics of two patients are being summarized in Table 1.
|
Case 1
A 50-year-old hypertensive female patient with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (CMP) was referred to our clinic with a recent history of resuscitated cardiopulmonary arrest, secondary to documented ventricular fibrillation (VF). She also had a history of multiple hospital admissions because of decompensated heart failure. She remained New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV despite optimal medical therapy. Her coronary angiogram revealed normal coronary anatomy. In her electrocardiography, a left bundle branch block (LBBB) was observed. Echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) revealed severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 11% and an intraventricular dyssynchrony of 68 ms. Although no arrhythmia was induced in the electrophysiological study (EPS), eventually, it was decided to implant CRT-D due to documented VF. Cephalic vein cut-down was performed. The anatomy of coronary sinus was complicated (highly tortuous, small vessel size, and high takeoff angle), and acute pulmonary oedema developed 25 min after coronary sinus cannulation, during which her blood pressure was 100/80 mmHg and heart rhythm was sinus tachycardia, 150 b.p.m. The procedure was postponed for 10 days till the patient was sufficiently stabilized. During the initial phase of the second attempt, acute pulmonary oedema developed again 30 min after the subclavian vein puncture, IABP was introduced through the right femoral artery, and counter-pulsation was activated at 1:1 ratio with maximum augmentation. A bolus of 5000 IU IV heparin was applied. Dyspnoea faded in a few minutes, after which we decided to continue with implantation. The LV lead could not be implanted because of the small size of the target vessel and high tortuosity. The ICD lead and right atrial lead with a biventricular ICD generator (CONTAK RENEWAL 4 HE, Guidant Corp., St Paul, MN, USA) were successfully implanted without any other procedure-related complication. The IABP could be weaned-off 3 h later. The LV lead was implanted epicardially by mini-thoracotomy 3 days later. The clinical status of the patient improved dramatically, and at 24 months follow-up, she had no further hospitalizations with an ejection fraction of 35% and her NYHA class decreased from IV to II.
Case 2
A 63-year-old female, hypertensive, and diabetic patient was admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis of ischaemic CMP. The patient had a history of old myocardial infarction and sporadic episodes of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT), which had been successfully converted to sinus rhythm by amiodarone infusion and direct current cardioversion. She had multiple hospitalizations owing to decompensated heart failure in the previous 3 months. Electrocardiogram showed LBBB pattern. Echocardiography coupled with TDI detected a low ejection fraction of 20% with a significant intraventricular delay of 100 ms. In the EPS, SMVT was induced. Because she was in NYHA class III despite optimal medical therapy, a CRT-D implantation was planned. After the LV lead had been positioned via cephalic vein cut-down, she developed acute pulmonary oedema with hypotension during the implantation of ICD lead. Because she did not improve with IV medication, including inotropic support, an IABP was activated at 1:1 ratio with maximum augmentation. A bolus of 5000 IU IV heparin was applied. The patient recovered immediately, and she tolerated the rest of the procedure with no further complications as ICD lead, right atrial lead, and the biventricular ICD generator (CONTAK RENEWAL 4 HE, Guidant Corp.) were implanted successfully. The IABP was removed 4 h later. During 12-month-follow-up, the patient was readmitted to the hospital only once owing to decompensated heart failure. Ejection fraction on follow-up was 22%.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionCase reportDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The success rate of CRT implantation is about 90%, however, the operation could be hampered by such complications as acute heart failure worsening.1
To the best of our knowledge, the incidence of acute pulmonary oedema during this procedure is uncertain. In this report, we presented two patients who experienced the development of acute pulmonary oedema, which improved shortly after the activation of IABP.
There are some possible mechanisms to explain why acute pulmonary oedema developed in these patients during the implantation. First, both the patients had very poor LV systolic function and stayed in supine position during a long-lasting procedure. Secondly, a considerable amount of contrast material which could have a depressant effect on an LV function2 was being used during the positioning of LV lead. Thus, the contrast material used during a very long-lasting procedure could also have provocated the acute worsening. Finally, anxiety related to the operation might have aggravated the acute decompensation secondary to sympathetic over-activity, as it is widely observed in patients with chronic heart failure,3 and could make the clinical scenario much more complicated.4
Another option in a similar scenario would be postponing the procedure and implanting the CRT device in another session. However, re-operation poses patients to many additional risks associated with wound site and subclavian puncture. Both the patients improved haemodynamically after the activation of IABP, and the implantations were successfully completed other than the epicardially implanted LV lead in Case 1. No other procedure-related complications were observed.
In conclusion, activation of IABP may be a safe and beneficial option for completing the procedure in patients experiencing acute heart failure worsening during CRT implantation. This approach could eliminate both the need for re-operation and diminish the associated risks.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionCase reportDiscussionReferences |
|---|
[1] Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, et al, MIRACLE study group. Multicenter insync randomized clinical evaluation. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med (2002) 346:1845–53.
[2] Bettmann MA, Bourdillon PD, Barry WH, Brush KA, Levin DC. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent. Radiology (1984) 153:583–7.
[3] Patel H, Shafazand M, Schaufelberger M, Ekman I. Reasons for seeking acute care in chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail (2007) 9:702–8.
[4] Ma Y, Li HC, Zheng LL, Yu HL. Hemodynamic changes in depressive patients. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B (2006) 7:133–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||