Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on November 11, 2009

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eup362
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/1/64    most recent
eup362v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Margey, R.
Right arrow Articles by O’Neill, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Margey, R.
Right arrow Articles by O’Neill, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


CLINICAL RESEARCH

Contemporary management of and outcomes from cardiac device related infections

Ronan Margey1,*, Hugh McCann1, Gavin Blake1, Edward Keelan1, Joseph Galvin1, Maureen Lynch2, Niall Mahon1, Declan Sugrue1 and James O’Neill1

1 Department of Cardiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and Mater Private Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland; 2 Clinical Microbiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and Mater Private Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland

Aims: To describe the incidence and management of cardiac device infection. Infection is a serious, potentially fatal complication of device implantation. The numbers of device implants and infections are rising. Optimal care of device infection is not well defined.

Methods and results: We retrospectively identified cases of device infection at our institution between 2000 and 2007 by multiple source record review, and active surveillance. Device infection was related to demographics, clinical, and procedural characteristics. Descriptive analysis was performed. From 2000 to 2007, a total of 2029 permanent pacemakers and 1076 biventricular/implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (ICDs) or ICDs were implanted. Thirty-nine cases of confirmed device infections were identified—27 pacemaker and 12 bivent/ICD or ICD infections, giving an infection rate of 1.25%. Median time from implant or revision to presentation was 150 days (range 2915 days, IQR25% 35–IQR75% 731). Ninety percent of patients presented with generator-site infections. The most common organism was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (30.8%), followed by coagulase negative Staphylococcus (20.5%). Complete device extraction occurred in 82%. Of these, none had relapse, and mortality was 7.4% (n = 2/27). With partial removal or conservative therapy (n = 13), relapse occurred in 67% (n = 8/12), with mortality of 8.4% (n = 1/12). Median duration of antibiotics was 42 days (range 47 days, IQR25% 28–IQR75% 42 days). Re-implantation of a new device occurred in 54%, at a median of 28 days (range 73 days, IQR25% 8.5–IQR75% 35 days). Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection predicted mortality (P < 0.004, RR 37, 95% CI 5.3–250). Median follow-up was 36 months.

Conclusion: Cardiac device infection is a rare complication, with significant morbidity and mortality. Complete hardware removal with appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy results in the best outcomes for patients.

Key Words: Pacemaker infection, Implantable cardioverter–defibrillator infection, Cardiac device infection, Cardiac-device endocarditis, Endocarditis


* Corresponding author. Tel: +353 1 8034367, Fax: +353 01 8034775, Email: rmargey{at}hotmail.com

Manuscript submitted 28 July 2009. Accepted after revision 20 October 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.