Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on October 27, 2009

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eup334
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kleemann, T.
Right arrow Articles by Seidl, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kleemann, T.
Right arrow Articles by Seidl, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


CLINICAL RESEARCH

Prevalence of bacterial colonization of generator pockets in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients without signs of infection undergoing generator replacement or lead revision

Thomas Kleemann1,*, Torsten Becker1, Margit Strauss1, Ngoc Dyck1, Udo Weisse1, Werner Saggau1, Ulrich Burkhardt2 and Karlheinz Seidl1

1 Cardiac Arrhythmia Center at the Heart Center of Ludwigshafen, Bremserstraße 79, Ludwigshafen D-67063, Germany; 2 Department of Medical Microbiology, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany

Aims: This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of bacterial colonization of generator pockets in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients without signs of infection and to analyse the impact of bacterial colonization on the incidence of device infection during follow-up.

Methods and results: In 122 ICD patients undergoing generator replacement or surgical lead revision between January 2006 and July 2008, microbiological cultures of generator pockets and extracted leads were consecutively obtained. Patients with clinical evidence of a device infection were excluded. Positive cultures from the generator pocket and leads were found in 40 (33%) patients. The most common bacteria isolated were coagulase negative staphylococci (68%). During a median follow-up time of 203 days after the revision device infection occurred in three [7.5%, confidence interval (CI) 1.6–20.4%] patients with a positive culture vs. two (2.4%, CI 0.3–8.5%) patients with a negative culture (P = 0.33). Time from revision to infection was 108 ± 73 days in patients with positive culture vs. 60 ± 39 days in patients with negative culture (P = 0.50).

Conclusion: A third of ICD patients undergoing generator replacement or lead revision have an asymptomatic bacterial colonization of generator pockets. After revision 7.5% of these patients develop a device infection with the same species of microorganism.

Key Words: Device infection, ICD, Swab culture


* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 621 503 4332, Fax: +49 621 503 4028, Email: kleemann.thomas{at}web.de

Manuscript submitted 20 July 2009. Accepted after revision 30 September 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.