Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on September 13, 2009

Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eup250
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.


CLINICAL RESEARCH

Device diagnostics and long-term clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy

Jagmeet P. Singh1,*, Lawrence S. Rosenthal2, Patrick M. Hranitzky3, Kellie Chase Berg4, Christopher M. Mullin5, Lisa Thackeray5 and Andrew Kaplan6

1 Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, GRB 109, Boston, MA 02114-2696, USA; 2 University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA; 3 Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC, USA; 4 Boston Scientific CRM, St Paul, MN, USA; 5 The Integra Group, Brooklyn Park, MN, USA; 6 Cardiovascular Associates of Mesa, Mesa, AZ, USA

Aims: This retrospective analysis sought to develop and validate a model using the measured diagnostic variables in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices to predict mortality.

Methods and results: Data used in this analysis came from two CRT studies: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry Evaluating Patient Response with RENEWAL Family Devices (CRT RENEWAL) (n = 436) and Heart Failure-Heart Rate Variability (HF-HRV) (n = 838). Patients from CRT RENEWAL were used to create a model for risk of death using logistic regression and to create a scoring system that could be used to predict mortality. Results of both the logistic regression and the clinical risk score were validated in a cohort of patients from the HF-HRV study. Diagnostics significantly improved over time post-CRT implant (all P < 0.001) and were correlated with a trend of decreased risk of death. The regression model classified CRT RENEWAL patients into low (2.8%), moderate (6.9%), and high (13.8%) risk of death based on tertiles of their model predicted risk. The clinical risk score classified CRT RENEWAL patients into low (2.8%), moderate (10.1%), and high (13.4%) risk of death based on tertiles of their score. When both the regression model and the clinical risk score were applied to the HF-HRV study, each was able to classify patients into appropriate levels of risk.

Conclusion: Device diagnostics may be used to create models that predict the risk of death.

Key Words: Heart failure, Heart rate, Heart rate variability, Autonomic nervous system, Biventricular pacing, Mortality


* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 617 726 4662, Fax: +1 617 726 3852, Email: jsingh{at}partners.org

Manuscript submitted 7 May 2009. Accepted after revision 10 August 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.