Skip Navigation



Europace Advance Access published online on November 7, 2008
Europace, doi:10.1093/europace/eun293
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/75    most recent
eun293v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nowak, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nowak, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

CLINICAL RESEARCH

Effects of increasing age onto procedural parameters in pacemaker implantation: results of an obligatory external quality control program

Bernd Nowak1,*, Björn Misselwitz2 on behalf of the Expert Committee ‘Pacemaker’, Institute of Quality Assurance Hessen

1 Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (CCB), Im Pruefling 23, D-60389 Frankfurt a.M., Germany; 2 Institute of Quality Assurance Hessen, Frankfurter Str. 10–14, D-65760 Eschborn, Germany

Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of increasing patients' age onto procedural parameters, especially complications, during primary pacemaker implantation, evaluating the database of the Institute of Quality Assurance Hessen in the federal state of Hessen, Germany.

Methods and results: The database of the obligatory external quality control program was evaluated retrospectively for the years 2003–2006. A total of 17 826 patients undergoing stationary primary pacemaker implantation have been registered in 72 centres. In single-chamber implants, the implant duration is shortest in non-agenarians. For dual-chamber implants, the implant duration shortens with increasing age. Thus, as well as fluoroscopy time is significantly shorter in the oldest patients. Atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds as well as R-wave amplitudes do not change with age. P-wave amplitudes showed a small but steady decline with increasing ages. Complications do not increase with advanced age.

Conclusion: In this large-scale real-life patient cohort of primary stationary pacemaker implantation, increasing age resulted only in reduced P-wave amplitudes. Higher age was not associated with an increased risk of complications. Thus, pacemaker implantations in the elderly can be performed with the same reliability as in younger patients.

Key Words: Pacemaker implantation, Age, Complications, Procedural parameters, Quality control

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 69 9450280; fax: +49 69 461613. E-mail address: b.nowak{at}ccb.de

Manuscript submitted 13 August 2008. Accepted after revision 8 October 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.