Skip Navigation

Europace 2007 9(Supplement 6):vi119-vi123; doi:10.1093/europace/eum216
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Dam, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by van Oosterom, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Dam, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by van Oosterom, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Analysing the potential of Reveal® for monitoring cardiac potentials

Peter M. van Dam1,* and Adriaan van Oosterom2

1 Medtronic SQDM, Meander 1051, 6825 MJ Arnhem, The Netherlands; 2 Department of Cardiology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland

Aims: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) continuously monitors the heart’s electric activity by means of a subcutaneous bipolar electrogram (Elg). Currently, the relationship between the Elg and the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) has been poorly documented. This model-based study aimed at investigating the differences between the bipolar surface and subcutaneous signals, as well as the effect of the insulating boundary of the ILR on these signals. Additionally, the model is used for determining the optimal implant location of the device.

Methods and results: Sinus rhythm ECG of a complete heart cycle was simulated by means of a biophysical model. Different volume conductors were created to investigate the effect of the insulating boundary of the ILR. The Elg closely matched the nearby bipolar ECG, both in morphology and in amplitude. The optimal localization and orientation of the ILR was found to depend on the Elg signal feature of interest, e.g. PQ, QRS, or STT waveforms.

Conclusion: The differences between the bipolar ECG on the surface and the subcutaneous electrogram are negligible. The optimal implant location may be based on nearby surface recordings. The simulation model is an eligible tool for determining the optimal implant location for the ILR, for all signal features of interest.

Key Words: Volume conductor models, Subcutaneous ECG, Implantable loop recorder

* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 26 3767292; fax: +31 26 3767305. E-mail address: peter.van.dam{at}medtronic.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.