Europace Advance Access originally published online on June 29, 2007
Europace 2007 9(8):621-626; doi:10.1093/europace/eum125
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
Atrial fibrillatory rate and risk of left atrial thrombus in atrial fibrillation
1 Department of Cardiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; 2 Department of Electroscience, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; 3 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Leipziger Str., 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
Aims In atrial fibrillation (AF), a relation between electrocardiogram (ECG) fibrillatory wave amplitude and thrombus formation has been sought for long with conflicting results. In contrast, the possible relation between atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from the surface ECG and left atrial thrombus formation in patients with AF is unknown and was consequently evaluated in this study.
Methods and results One-hundred and twenty-five patients (mean age 64 ± 12 years, 72% male) with persistent non-valvular AF (mean duration 28 ± 80 days) undergoing transesophageal echocardiography were studied. In all patients, standard 12-lead ECG recordings were acquired before the examination. Atrial fibrillatory rate was determined using spatiotemporal QRST cancellation and time–frequency analysis of lead V1. Atrial fibrillatory rate measured 401 ± 63 fibrillations per minute (fpm, range 235–566 fpm) and was related with age (R = –0.326, P < 0.001), ventricular rate (R = –0.202, P = 0.024), gender (407 ± 62 in males vs. 387 ± 64 fpm in females, P = 0.038) but not AF duration (R = 0.088, P = 0.374), presence of lone AF (408 ± 66 vs. 394 ± 58 fpm, P = 0.228), or beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker treatment (398 ± 63 vs. 405 ± 62 fpm, P = 0.556). Age was the only independent predictor of fibrillatory rate (B = –1.714, P < 0.001).
In patients with left atrial thrombus (n = 10), spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) was more frequently present (70 vs. 29 %, p = 0.007) and left atrial appendage (LAA) outflow velocity was lower (26 ± 20 vs. 37 ± 15 cm/s, P = 0.012) than in patients without thrombus (n = 115). In contrast, mean fibrillatory rate, which showed a weak inverse correlation with LAA velocity (R = –0.118, P = 0.048) was not different between both groups (380 ± 56 vs. 403 ± 63 fpm, P = 0.226). Similarly, presence of thrombus and SEC combined was not related with fibrillatory rate.
Conclusion Atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from surface ECG lead V1 is not a risk marker for left atrial thrombus formation in AF.
Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Echocardiography, Thrombus
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 391 67 13203.E-mail address: andreas.bollmann{at}kard.lu.se
Manuscript submitted 20 January 2007.
Revision received 28 May 2007.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Bollmann, A. Tveit, D. Husser, M. Stridh, L. Sornmo, P. Smith, and S. B. Olsson Fibrillatory rate response to candesartan in persistent atrial fibrillation Europace, October 1, 2008; 10(10): 1138 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|