Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on July 18, 2007
Europace 2007 9(8):613-620; doi:10.1093/europace/eum144
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/8/613    most recent
eum144v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forleo, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mantica, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forleo, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mantica, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Gender-related differences in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Giovanni B. Forleo1,*, Claudio Tondo2, Lucia De Luca3, Antonio Dello Russo4, Michela Casella4, Valerio De Sanctis1, Fabrizio Clementi3, Rafael Lopes Fagundes2, Roberto Leo3, Francesco Romeo3 and Massimo Mantica1

1 Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center, St Ambrogio Clinical Institute, Via Luigi Faravelli, 16-20149 Milan, Italy; 2 Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center and Heart Failure Unit, St Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; 3 Department of Cardiology, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Rome, Italy; 4 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy

Aims Women have an increased risk for atrial fibrillation (AF)-related complications and there is evidence towards a reduced efficacy of the rhythm control strategy than men. A catheter-based strategy is therefore widely attractive, but the impact of gender on catheter ablation (CA) of AF remains undefined.

Methods and results We included 221 consecutive patients (150 men) who underwent CA of drug-refractory AF. Gender differences in clinical presentation and outcomes were compared. Women were older (P = 0.002), had a longer history of AF (P = 0.04), and were more likely to have hypertension (P = 0.04). Moreover, a concomitant valvular heart disease tended to be more common in women (32.4 vs. 23.3%; P = 0.28) and left atrium dimensions were significantly larger (P = 0.003). However, acute success rate and complications rate were similar between genders. After 22.5 ± 11.8 months of follow-up, the overall freedom from arrhythmia recurrences was similar (83.1 vs. 82.7% in men), and a similar improvement in SF-36 quality of life scores was achieved in both groups.

Conclusion Women are referred for AF ablation later with a more complex clinical pre-operative presentation. Despite this higher risk profile in women, no differences were detected in clinical outcomes. Our findings indicate that CA of AF appears to be safe and effective in women as in men.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Arrhythmia, Gender


* Corresponding author. Tel: +39 02 33127712 ext. 7713; fax: +39 02 33127038.E-mail address: forleo{at}tiscali.it

Manuscript submitted 7 August 2006. Accepted after revision 21 June 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. Terasawa, E. M. Balk, M. Chung, A. C. Garlitski, A. A. Alsheikh-Ali, J. Lau, and S. Ip
Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Ann Intern Med, August 4, 2009; 151(3): 191 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.