Europace Advance Access originally published online on April 21, 2007
Europace 2007 9(6):437-441; doi:10.1093/europace/eum061
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PACING
First experience with a new active fixation coronary sinus lead
1 Medical Department, St Adolfstift, Hamburgerstr. 41, D-21465 Reinbek, Germany; 2 Department of Cardiology, Albertinenkrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany; 3 Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
Aims Coronary sinus (CS) lead implantation is a technically challenging procedure owing to variable vein anatomies and a high dislocation rate. Therefore, CS lead technology has undergone evolutionary changes during the last 10 years. The mode of fixation has been a passive one up to now. We want to describe our first clinical experience with the newly available active fixation lead 4195 in terms of dislocation rate and stability of thresholds compared with conventional models.
Methods and results From 1999 to February 2007, we implanted 403 CS leads in 368 patients. Leads were categorized into three different groups on the basis of their fixation mechanism: straight (Easytrak I and Situs OTW; n = 54), curved (Attain 4193 and 4194, Corox, Aescula, Situs ULD; n = 308), and active (Attain 4195; n = 41). Operative and follow-up data were prospectively noted and checked for significance between groups during the first 3 months after implantation. Kaplan–Meier analysis of long-term lead function was also performed. Straight and curved CS leads suffered from significantly more dislocations compared with active fixation (P < 0.001). The active fixation lead (4195) has a stable threshold over time compared with a significant rise after 24 h and thereafter in straight (62%) and curved leads (20%). However, retraction of an active fixation CS lead may be a difficult issue as outlined in two cases requiring pullback of a 4195 lead owing to phrenic nerve stimulation (one unsuccessful despite vigorous traction).
Conclusion The active fixation lead 4195 using retention lobes yielded stable thresholds over time and seems to be superior to conventional leads in terms of dislocation. However, extraction may be a difficult or even impossible task.
Key Words: CRT, Pacing, New technology
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 40 7280 5158; fax: +49 40 7280 2729. E-mail address: naegele{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de
Manuscript submitted 21 February 2007. Accepted after revision 10 March 2007.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Nagele, S. Behrens, and M. Azizi Reversing cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder status in a patient with a surgically placed epicardial left ventricular lead by switching to an active fixation coronary sinus lead Europace, October 1, 2008; 10(10): 1234 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Szilagyi, B. Merkely, E. Zima, V. Kutyifa, G. Szucs, G. Fulop, L. Molnar, Z. Szabolcs, and L. Geller Minimal invasive coronary sinus lead reposition technique for the treatment of phrenic nerve stimulation Europace, October 1, 2008; 10(10): 1157 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|