Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on March 19, 2007
Europace 2007 9(5):270-274; doi:10.1093/europace/eum015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/5/270    most recent
eum015v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ermis, C.
Right arrow Articles by Benditt, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ermis, C.
Right arrow Articles by Benditt, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA

Comparison of ventricular arrhythmia burden, therapeutic interventions, and survival, in patients < 75 and patients ≥ 75 years of age treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Cengiz Ermis1, Alan X. Zhu2, Laura VanHeel3, R.N. Scott Sakaguchi2,3, Keith G. Lurie2,3, Fei Lu2 and David G. Benditt2,3,*

1 Cardiovascular Division, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey; 2 Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 3 Central Minnesota Heart Center, St Cloud, MN, USA

Aim: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) reduce arrhythmic mortality in a wide range of patients with poor left ventricular (LV) function. However, whether ICD therapy is equally effective in younger and older patients remains uncertain. To address this question, we compared ICD-documented ventricular tachyarrhythmia burden in patients < 75 years of age (Group 1) and ≥ 75 years of age (Group 2).

Methods: Data were obtained from 208 consecutive ICD-treated patients: 159 Group 1 (mean age 59 ± 12), and 49 Group 2 (mean age 79 ± 3). Demographic and clinical features including presenting arrhythmias, LV ejection fraction, and nature of heart disease were similar. Medications were comparable except that amiodarone use was more frequent in Group 2.

Results: The numbers of combined ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes per month were 0.4 ± 2 and 0.3 ± 2 for groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.7). Individually, VT episodes per month were 0.4 ± 2 and 0.3 ± 2 (P = 0.7) and VF episodes per month were 0.003 ± 0.01 and 0.03 ± 0.2 (P = 0.2) for the two groups, respectively. The mean duration and average cycle length of arrhythmias were 3.1 ± 20.4 s and 275 ± 119 ms in Group 1, and 6 ± 45 s and 285 ± 114 ms in Group 2 (P values, 0.6 and 0.8). The mean time between the ICD implantation and the first episode of a device-treated arrhythmia was comparable in the two groups. Thirty-six patients died during follow-up; 22 (14%) Group 1 and 14 (29%) Group 2 (P = 0.02), almost exclusively on a non-sudden cardiac basis. Thus, despite higher ultimate mortality in older patients, both the nature and characteristics of spontaneous arrhythmia recurrence, and the time to first apparently beneficial therapy, were similar during follow-up in the two groups.

Conclusion: In terms of reversing potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, the rationale for ICD therapy is comparable in older and younger individuals.

Key Words: Ventricular arrhythmia burden, Elderly, Implantable cardioverter defibrillators


* Corresponding author: Tel: +612 625 4401; fax: +612 624 4937. E-mail address: bendi001{at}umn.edu

Manuscript submitted 3 September 2006. Accepted after revision 30 December 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.