Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on January 25, 2007
Europace 2007 9(3):186-191; doi:10.1093/europace/eul185
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/3/186    most recent
eul185v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennebäck, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nordlander, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kennebäck, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nordlander, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


AV BLOCK

High-degree atrioventricular block during anti-arrhythmic drug treatment: use of a pacemaker with a bradycardia-detection algorithm to study the time course after drug withdrawal

Göran Kennebäck1,*, Fariborz Tabrizi1,2, Peter Lindell1 and Rolf Nordlander2

1 Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge 14186 Stockholm, Sweden; 2 South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Aim This study examines the recurrence of high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) during a follow-up period of 2 years in patients with restored AV node function after antiarrhythmic drug withdrawal at implantation of a pacemaker.

Methods Nine men and eight women (77 ± 7 years) taking antiarrhythmic drugs (beta-receptor blockers in 15) and presenting with high-degree AVB were followed for 2 years after being taken off drugs upon receiving a permanent pacemaker with special bradycardia detection software.

Results At inclusion, surface ECG identified two subsets of patients: a QRS duration < 120 ms (n = 5) and those with a QRS duration ≥120 ms (n = 12). During the 2-year follow-up, progression to high-degree AVB occurred in these groups: 1/5 (20%) and 9/12 (75%) P < 0.05. Six patients had to be restarted on drugs, mostly beta-receptor blockers, due to atrial tachyarrhythmias: 3/5 and 3/12. In total, 16 patients (94%) either developed high-degree AVB needing pacing or atrial tachyarrhythmias requiring drug treatment.

Conclusion Patients on beta-receptor blocking drugs and QRS width ≥120 ms developing high-degree AVB should be recommended a pacemaker without further investigation or observation.

Key Words: Atrioventricular block, Drugs, Pacemaker, Pacemaker algorithm


* Corresponding author. Tel: +46 8 58580000; fax: +46 8 58586710. E-mail address: goran.kenneback{at}karolinska.se

Manuscript submitted 24 May 2006. Accepted after revision 4 November 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.