CRT
Determination of optimal atrioventricular delay for cardiac resynchronization therapy using acute non-invasive blood pressure
1 International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, St Mary's Hospital and Imperial College, 5, 9-61 North Wharf Road, London W2 1LA, UK; 2 The Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; 3 The Heart Hospital, London, UK; 4 Department of Cardiology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
Aims In this study, we apply non-invasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring, by continuous finger photoplethysmography (Finometer), to detect directly haemodynamic responses during adjustment of the atrioventricular (AV) delay of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), at different heart rates.
Methods and results Twelve patients were studied with six re-attending for reproducibility assessment. At each AV delay, systolic BP relative to a reference AV delay of 120 ms (SBPrel) was calculated. We found that at higher heart rates, altering the AV delay had a more pronounced effect on BP (average range of SBPrel=17.4 mmHg) compared with resting rates (average range of SBPrel=6.5 mmHg), P<0.0001. Secondly, peak AV delay differed between patients (minimum 120 ms, maximum 200 ms). Thirdly, small changes in AV delay had significant BP effects: programming AV delay 40 ms below the peak AV delay reduced SBPrel by 4.9 mmHg (P<0.003); having it 40 ms above the peak decreased SBPrel by 4.4 mmHg (P<0.0005). Finally, the peak AV delay is highly reproducible both on the same day and at 3 months (Bland–Altman difference: 3±8 ms).
Conclusions Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring demonstrates that even small changes in AV delay from its haemodynamic peak value have a significant effect on BP. This peak varies between individuals, is highly reproducible, and is more pronounced at higher heart rates than resting rates.
Key Words: Biventricular pacing, Atrioventricular delay optimization, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Finometer, Blood pressure, Heart failure
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 20 7594 1263; fax: +44 20 7594 1388. E-mail address: zacharywhinnett{at}yahoo.com
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Kamdar, E. Frain, F. Warburton, L. Richmond, V. Mullan, T. Berriman, G. Thomas, J. Tenkorang, M. Dhinoja, M. Earley, et al. A prospective comparison of echocardiography and device algorithms for atrioventricular and interventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy Europace, January 1, 2010; 12(1): 84 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Z. Khan, M. S. Virdee, P. J. Pugh, P. A. Read, S. P. Fynn, and D. P. Dutka Non-invasive cardiac output measurements based on bioreactance for optimization of atrio- and interventricular delays Europace, December 1, 2009; 11(12): 1666 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C E Raphael, Z I Whinnett, J E Davies, M Fontana, E A Ferenczi, C H Manisty, J Mayet, and D P Francis Quantifying the paradoxical effect of higher systolic blood pressure on mortality in chronic heart failure Heart, January 1, 2009; 95(1): 56 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Stanton, N. M. Hawkins, K. J. Hogg, N. E.R. Goodfield, M. C. Petrie, and J. J.V. McMurray How should we optimize cardiac resynchronization therapy? Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2008; 29(20): 2458 - 2472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Zuber, S. Toggweiler, M. Roos, R. Kobza, P. Jamshidi, and P. Erne Comparison of different approaches for optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular delay in biventricular pacing Europace, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 367 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z I Whinnett, J E R Davies, K Willson, C H Manisty, A W Chow, R A Foale, D Wyn Davies, A D Hughes, J Mayet, and D P Francis Haemodynamic effects of changes in atrioventricular and interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronisation therapy show a consistent pattern: analysis of shape, magnitude and relative importance of atrioventricular and interventricular delay Heart, November 1, 2006; 92(11): 1628 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|